Effects on mean arterial blood pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure after bolus propofol during propofol/fentanyl maintenance anaesthesia

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 36) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
L. Jensen ◽  
L. Krogh ◽  
B. Dahl ◽  
N. Juul ◽  
G. E. Cold
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood

Cerebral Autoregulation-oriented Therapy at the Bedside

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Rivera-Lara ◽  
Andres Zorrilla-Vaca ◽  
Romergryko G. Geocadin ◽  
Ryan J. Healy ◽  
Wendy Ziai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Autoregulation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Direct Blood Pressure

Abstract This comprehensive review summarizes the evidence regarding use of cerebral autoregulation-directed therapy at the bedside and provides an evaluation of its impact on optimizing cerebral perfusion and associated functional outcomes. Multiple studies in adults and several in children have shown the feasibility of individualizing mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure goals by using cerebral autoregulation monitoring to calculate optimal levels. Nine of these studies examined the association between cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial blood pressure being above or below their optimal levels and functional outcomes. Six of these nine studies (66%) showed that patients for whom median cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial blood pressure differed significantly from the optimum, defined by cerebral autoregulation monitoring, were more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. The evidence indicates that monitoring of continuous cerebral autoregulation at the bedside is feasible and has the potential to be used to direct blood pressure management in acutely ill patients.

Cerebral Hemodynamic Effects of Morphine and Fentanyl in Patients with Severe Head Injury

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam de Nadal ◽  
Francisca Munar ◽  
M. Antonia Poca ◽  
Joan Sahuquillo ◽  
Angel Garnacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Oxygen Content ◽  
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Content Difference ◽  
Arterial Blood

Background The current study investigates the effects of morphine and fentanyl upon intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow estimated by cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference and transcranial Doppler sonography in 30 consecutive patients with severe head injury in whom cerebrovascular autoregulation previously had been assessed. Methods Patients received morphine (0.2 mg/kg) and fentanyl (2 microg/kg) intravenously over 1 min but 24 h apart in a randomized fashion. Before study, carbon dioxide reactivity and autoregulation were assessed. Intracranial pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure were repeatedly monitored for 1 h after the administration of both opioids. Cerebral blood flow was estimated from the reciprocal of arteriovenous oxygen content difference and middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity using transcranial Doppler sonography. Results Although carbon dioxide reactivity was preserved in all patients, 18 patients (56.7%) showed impaired or abolished autoregulation to hypertensive challenge, and only 12 (43.3%) had preserved autoregulation. Both morphine and fentanyl caused significant increases in intracranial pressure and decreases in mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure, but estimated cerebral blood flow remain unchanged. In patients with preserved autoregulation, opioid-induced intracranial pressure increases were not different than in those with impaired autoregulation. Conclusions The authors conclude that both morphine and fentanyl moderately increase intracranial pressure and decrease mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure but have no significant effect on arteriovenous oxygen content difference and middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity in patients with severe brain injury. No differences on intracranial pressure changes were found between patients with preserved and impaired autoregulation. Our results suggest that other mechanisms, besides the activation of the vasodilatory cascade, also could be implicated in the intracranial pressure increases seen after opioid administration.

scholarly journals Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245291
Author(s):  
Alexander Ruesch ◽  
Deepshikha Acharya ◽  
Samantha Schmitt ◽  
Jason Yang ◽  
Matthew A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Animal Model ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Autoregulation ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Arterial Blood

The brain’s ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen’s curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.

Blood Pressure Variability and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure—New Therapeutic Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. E300-E309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodor Svedung Wettervik ◽  
Timothy Howells ◽  
Anders Lewén ◽  
Per Enblad
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure

Abstract BACKGROUND Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) is an autoregulatory-oriented target in the neurointensive care (NIC) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), and deviation from CPPopt is associated with poor outcome. We recently found that blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with deviation from CPPopt. OBJECTIVE To evaluate BPV and other variables related to deviation from CPPopt and to evaluate challenges and strategies for autoregulatory-oriented treatment in TBI. METHODS Data including arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure (ICP) from 362 TBI patients treated at the NIC unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2008 and 2016, were retrospectively analyzed day 2 to 5. RESULTS Higher BPV was a strong predictor of both CPP deviation below and above CPPopt after multiple regression analyses. There was no other explanatory variable for CPP deviation above CPPopt, whereas also higher ICP and worse autoregulation (higher pressure reactivity index) were associated with CPP deviation below CPPopt. A higher BPV was, in turn, explained by older age, lower ICP, higher mean arterial blood pressure, and higher slow arterial blood pressure amplitude (0.018-0.067 Hz). CONCLUSION BPV was strongly associated with deviation from CPPopt. High age is a risk factor for high BPV and hence CPP insults. Our treatment protocol is focused on avoiding CPP below 60 mm Hg. It is possible that a more restrictive upper level could generate more stable blood pressure and less deviation from CPPopt.

Sevoflurane Increases Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Normocapnic Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy 

1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pekka Talke ◽  
James E. Caldwell ◽  
Charles A. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Csf Pressure ◽  
Sevoflurane Group ◽  
Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid

Background The data on the effect of sevoflurane on intracranial pressure in humans are still limited and inconclusive. The authors hypothesized that sevoflurane would increase intracranial pressure as compared to propofoL METHODS: In 20 patients with no evidence of mass effect undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, anesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl and propofol and maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a continuous propofol infusion, 100 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The authors assigned patients to two groups randomized to receive only continued propofol infusion (n = 10) or sevoflurane (n = 10) for 20 min. During the 20-min study period, each patient in the sevoflurane group received, in random order, two concentrations (0.5 times the minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] and 1.0 MAC end-tidal) of sevoflurane for 10 min each. The authors continuously monitored lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and anesthetic concentrations. Results Lumbar CSF pressure increased by 2+/-2 mmHg (mean+/-SD) with both 0.5 MAC and 1 MAC of sevoflurane. Cerebral perfusion pressure decreased by 11+/-5 mmHg with 0.5 MAC and by 15+/-4 mmHg with 1.0 MAC of sevoflurane. Systolic blood pressure decreased with both concentrations of sevoflurane. To maintain blood pressure within predetermined limits (within+/-20% of baseline value), phenylephrine was administered to 5 of 10 patients in the sevoflurane group (range = 50-300 microg) and no patients in the propofol group. Lumbar CSF pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and systolic blood pressure did not change in the propofol group. Conclusions Sevoflurane, at 0.5 and 1.0 MAC, increases lumbar CSF pressure. The changes produced by 1.0 MAC sevoflurane did not differ from those observed in a previous study with 1.0 MAC isoflurane or desflurane.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document