Paniculate Radiographic Contrast Material in Quantitative Evaluation of Experimental Mitral Insufficiency

1968 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thoreild Mygind ◽  
Milos Sovk
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne V Clough ◽  
Steven T Haworth ◽  
David L Roerig ◽  
Eric A Hoffman ◽  
Christopher A Dawson

1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 655
Author(s):  
Sang Min Lee ◽  
Eun Kyung Park ◽  
Hye Ryoung Kim ◽  
Myung Won Cho ◽  
Boo Kyung Han ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215265671989284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Sanan ◽  
Marija Rowane ◽  
Robert Hostoffer

This protocol for rapid desensitization to intravenous radiographic contrast material (RCM) improves the strategy first reported by Uppal et al. Desensitization is a validated preventative measure for medical emergencies, such as cardiac catheterization, when patients present with histories of anaphylactoid reactions to the allergen of concern. The patient required another catheterization that was modified to repeat the final dosage of 320 mg/mL of Visipaque®, accommodating cardiac catheterization postponement, contrary to readministration of doses 4 (0.625 mg/mL) and 8 (10 mg/mL) as reported in Uppal et al. Our risk score calculations suggested that the patient was at low risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) that did not necessitate reduced dosage. No complications were reported following catheterization. We propose repetition of the final RCM dosage as a more effective and efficient desensitization strategy, as long as the scoring system does not indicate high risk for CIN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document