The Quantification of Low Back Disorder Using Motion Measures

Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (20) ◽  
pp. 2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Marras ◽  
Sue A. Ferguson ◽  
Purnendu Gupta ◽  
Smarajit Bose ◽  
Mohamad Parnianpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-183
Author(s):  
Michael J. Jorgensen ◽  
Amit Handa ◽  
Prabaharan Veluswamy
Keyword(s):  
Low Back ◽  

The objective of this study was to assess the affect of pallet location on torso kinematics during lifting. Participants transferred 11.3 kg boxes to pallets at two orientations and two distances from a constant lift origin. When reorienting the pallet from 180° to 90°, torso twist, lateral and sagittal torso kinematics increased when palletizing to various locations on the pallet when keeping the pallet distance far. Torso flexion increased slightly at the lowest level on the pallet independent of the pallet distance. When keeping the pallet distance close, torso twist kinematics decreased only when palletizing to the highest and closest position of the pallet. When reorienting the pallet from 180° to 90° adjacent to the lift origin, the best strategy to reduce torso kinematics appears to be to eliminate the transferring of loads to the lowest level of the pallet, and keeping the pallet close to the lift origin.


Ergonomics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 949-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Jorgensen ◽  
Amit Handa ◽  
Prabaharan Veluswamy ◽  
Manish Bhatt
Keyword(s):  
Low Back ◽  

Author(s):  
W. S. Marras ◽  
K. G. Davis ◽  
B. C. Kirking ◽  
P. K. Bertsche

Patient handlers suffer from low back injuries at an alarming rate. While many have found patient handling to be associated with incidences of low back pain, there has been limited research quantifying the risk for the specific tasks performed by the patient handlers. The current study used both a risk evaluation system (Low Back Disorder risk model) and a biomechanical model (EMG-assisted spinal loading model) to quantitatively evaluate risk of LBD during patient handling. Seventeen subjects (twelve experienced and five inexperienced) performed several patient handling tasks. The patient transfers were between bed and wheelchair (fixed and removable arms) and between a commode chair and hospital chair. A “standard” patient (a 50 kg cooperative female; non-weight bearing but had use of upper body) was used in all patient handling tasks. Overall, patient handling was found to be an extremely hazardous job that had substantial risk of causing a low back injury. There was significant risk when transferring the patient with either one or two patient handlers. However, the greatest risk was associated with the one-person transferring techniques. The actual task performed had limited effect on the risk of LBD and the three-dimensional spinal loads. Even the safest of tasks (evaluated in this study) had significant risk. These findings suggest that the only feasible means to control risk would be to provide mechanical lift assists devices.


Ergonomics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1226-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue A Ferguson ◽  
William S Marras ◽  
Deborah L Burr

Author(s):  
Bernard Martin ◽  
Diane Adamo ◽  
Robert Felicitas ◽  
Stephen Burastero ◽  
K. Han Kim

This study investigates the effects of heavy pallet and drum handling on spinal loading at the L5/S1 region and surface electromyographic activity of the erector spinae muscles, and the associated risk of low back disorder (LBD). Ten field technicians at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) were asked to unstack plastic and metallic pallets and manipulate 55 gallon waste drums. Lifting the metallic and plastic pallets and lowering a 34 Kg drum induced the highest disc compression at the L5/S1 level, while manipulating the pallets and breaking up a 203 Kg drum induced the highest low back muscle activity. The major results showed that posture has a significant influence on disc compression force; however, the lowest muscle load may not be correlated with the lowest disc compression. The computed disc compression forces and EMG activities are most likely responsible for the elevated risk of back injury in waste management workers.


Author(s):  
Steven A. Lavender ◽  
William S. Marras ◽  
Sue A. Ferguson ◽  
Riley E. Splittstoesser ◽  
Gang Yang ◽  
...  

Low back disorders continue to be the most common and significant work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the US. Identifying what constitutes a “safe” physical workload has been the biggest challenge facing injury prevention efforts. Prior low back injury risk models have focused on manufacturing activities where there is limited variability in the parameters used to describe the exposures to low back disorder risk factors. Lifting tasks in distribution centers can have considerably more variability in load and physical layout. The goal of this project was to identify and quantify measures that characterize the biomechanical risk factors, including measures of the load moment exposure, and measures that characterize the duty cycle that are predictive of low back disorders in distribution centers. Thus, our hypothesis was that we could define a relationship between moment exposure parameters and the low back disorder incidence rates. A cross-sectional study was designed to examine the mechanical risk factors responsible for reported low back injury in distributions centers. The physical exposure was measured on 195 workers on 50 jobs in 21 distribution centers using a sonic-based Moment Exposure Tracking System (METS). The METS measures load, force, load moment, torso kinematics, and temporal parameters of the job simultaneously. For each job, low back injury rates were collected retrospectively from the company's records over the prior 3-year period. The data were used to develop a risk model designed to predict back injury risk based upon direct measures of load and load moment exposure. The model incorporates biomechanical variables which include the load moment and horizontal sliding forces, as well as a temporal variable indicating the opportunity for micro-breaks during the work process. Overall, the presented model has very good sensitivity (87%) and specificity (73%).


Author(s):  
W. Gary Allread ◽  
William S. Marras ◽  
Kevin P. Granata ◽  
Kermit G. Davis ◽  
Michael J. Jorgensen

Workers from a local food distribution center were studied depalletizing boxes from a pallet. The objectives of this study were to determine the change in trunk kinematics associated with selecting boxes having different characteristics and to observe if there was a relationship between trunk kinematics and employee job experience. The boxes varied in terms of: size; presence/absence of handles; weight; and location on a pallet. Worker job experience also was recorded. Kinematic trunk motions and subsequent risk of low back disorder (LBD), assessed using a risk model, were studied as dependent measures. Results indicated that the weight and layer conditions influenced most of the kinematic variables. The size and handle conditions influenced fewer dependent measures. All main effects but the handle condition had an influence on LBD risk. Most of the significant interaction effects were related to layer, illustrating the tremendous influence that box location on a pallet had on trunk kinematics and LBD risk. In fact, at the bottom pallet layers, LBD risk was the same regardless of the weight lifted or the size of the box. In studying job experience, inexperienced workers were found to have LBD risk values that were, on average, 5% higher than the experienced group. This study has been successful at pinpointing which box parameters are worthy of consideration to include in a food distribution environment for the purposes of reducing the risk of work-related LBD.


Spine ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 2558-2563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Til Stürmer ◽  
Stefan Luessenhoop ◽  
Axel Neth ◽  
Matthias Soyka ◽  
Wilfried Karmaus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document