Preoxygenation in Pregnancy: The Effect of Fresh Gas Flow Rates Within A Circle Breathing System

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
E. C. Russell ◽  
I. Wrench ◽  
M. Feast ◽  
F. Mohammed
Anaesthesia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 833-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. Russell ◽  
I. Wrench ◽  
M. Feast ◽  
F. Mohammed

Author(s):  
Martin Bellgardt ◽  
Dominik Drees ◽  
Vladimir Vinnikov ◽  
Adrian I. Georgevici ◽  
Livia Procopiuc ◽  
...  

AbstractTo identify the better volatile anaesthetic delivery system in an intensive care setting, we compared the circle breathing system and two models of reflection systems (AnaConDa™ with a dead space of 100 ml (ACD-100) or 50 ml (ACD-50)). These systems were analysed for the parameters like wash-in, consumption, and wash-out of isoflurane and sevoflurane utilising a test lung model. The test lung was connected to a respirator (circle breathing system: Aisys CS™; ACD-100/50: Puriton Bennett 840). Set parameters were volume-controlled mode, tidal volume-500 ml, respiratory rate-10/min, inspiration time-2 sec, PEEP-5 mbar, and oxygen-21%. Wash-in, consumption, and wash-out were investigated at fresh gas flows of 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 l/min. Anaesthetic target concentrations were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%.  Wash-in was slower in ACD-100/-50 compared to the circle breathing system, except for fresh gas flows of 0.5 and 1.0 l/min. The consumption of isoflurane and sevoflurane in ACD-100 and ACD-50 corresponded to the fresh gas flow of 0.5-1.0 l/min in the circle breathing system. Consumption with ACD-50 was higher in comparison to ACD-100, especially at gas concentrations > 1.5%. Wash-out was quicker in ACD-100/-50 than in the circle breathing system at a fresh gas flow of 0.5 l/min, however, it was longer at all the other flow rates. Wash-out was comparable in ACD-100 and ACD-50. Wash-in and wash-out were generally quicker with the circle breathing system than in ACD-100/-50. However, consumption at 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration was comparable at flows of 0.5 and 1.0 l/min.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Ritchie ◽  
A. B. Williams ◽  
C. Gerard ◽  
H. Hockey

In this study, we evaluated the performance of a humidified nasal high-flow system (Optiflow™, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare) by measuring delivered FiO2 and airway pressures. Oxygraphy, capnography and measurement of airway pressures were performed through a hypopharyngeal catheter in healthy volunteers receiving Optiflow™ humidified nasal high flow therapy at rest and with exercise. The study was conducted in a non-clinical experimental setting. Ten healthy volunteers completed the study after giving informed written consent. Participants received a delivered oxygen fraction of 0.60 with gas flow rates of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 l/minute in random order. FiO2, FEO2, FECO2 and airway pressures were measured. Calculation of FiO2 from FEO2 and FECO2 was later performed. Calculated FiO2 approached 0.60 as gas flow rates increased above 30 l/minute during nose breathing at rest. High peak inspiratory flow rates with exercise were associated with increased air entrainment. Hypopharyngeal pressure increased with increasing delivered gas flow rate. At 50 l/minute the system delivered a mean airway pressure of up to 7.1 cmH2O. We believe that the high gas flow rates delivered by this system enable an accurate inspired oxygen fraction to be delivered. The positive mean airway pressure created by the high flow increases the efficacy of this system and may serve as a bridge to formal positive pressure systems.


Author(s):  
Z. Insepov ◽  
R. J. Miller

Propagation of Rayleigh traveling waves from a gas on a nanotube surface activates a macroscopic flow of the gas (or gases) that depends critically on the atomic mass of the gas. Our molecular dynamics simulations show that the surface waves are capable of actuating significant macroscopic flows of atomic and molecular hydrogen, helium, and a mixture of both gases both inside and outside carbon nanotubes (CNT). In addition, our simulations predict a new “nanoseparation” effect when a nanotube is filled with a mixture of two gases with different masses or placed inside a volume filled with a mixture of several gases with different masses. The mass selectivity of the nanopumping can be used to develop a highly selective filter for various gases. Gas flow rates, pumping, and separation efficiencies were calculated at various wave frequencies and phase velocities of the surface waves. The nanopumping effect was analyzed for its applicability to actuate nanofluids into fuel cells through carbon nanotubes.


1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Rosenwald ◽  
Don W. Green

Abstract This paper presents a mathematical modeling procedure for determining the optimum locations of procedure for determining the optimum locations of wells in an underground reservoir. It is assumed that there is a specified production-demand vs time relationship for the reservoir under study. Several possible sites for new wells are also designated. possible sites for new wells are also designated. The well optimization technique will then select, from among those wellsites available, the locations of a specified number of wells and determine the proper sequencing of flow rates from Those wells so proper sequencing of flow rates from Those wells so that the difference between the production-demand curve and the flow curve actually attained is minimized. The method uses a branch-and-bound mixed-integer program (BBMIP) in conjunction with a mathematical reservoir model. The calculation with the BBMIP is dependent upon the application of superposition to the results from the mathematical reservoir model.This technique is applied to two different types of reservoirs. In the first, it is used for locating wells in a hypothetical groundwater system, which is described by a linear mathematical model. The second application of the method is to a nonlinear problem, a gas storage reservoir. A single-phase problem, a gas storage reservoir. A single-phase gas reservoir mathematical model is used for this purpose. Because of the nonlinearity of gas flow, purpose. Because of the nonlinearity of gas flow, superposition is not strictly applicable and the technique is only approximate. Introduction For many years, members of the petroleum industry and those concerned with groundwater hydrology have been developing mathematical reservoir modeling techniques. Through multiple runs of a reservoir simulator, various production schemes or development possibilities may be evaluated and their relative merits may be considered; i.e., reservoir simulators can be used to "optimize" reservoir development and production. Formal optimization techniques offer potential savings in the time and costs of making reservoir calculations compared with the generally used trial-and-error approach and, under proper conditions, can assure that the calculations will lead to a true optimum.This work is an extension of the application of models to the optimization of reservoir development. Given a reservoir, a designated production demand for the reservoir, and a number of possible sites for wells, the problem is to determine which of those sites would be the best locations for a specified number of new wells so that the production-demand curve is met as closely as possible. Normally, fewer wells are to be drilled than there are sites available. Thus, the question is, given n possible locations, at which of those locations should n wells be drilled, where n is less than n? A second problem, that of determining the optimum relative problem, that of determining the optimum relative flow rates of present and future wells is also considered. The problem is attacked through the simultaneous use of a reservoir simulator and a mixed-integer programming technique.There have been several reported studies concerned with be use of mathematical models to select new wells in gas storage or producing fields. Generally, the approach has been to use a trial-and-error method in which different well locations are assumed. A mathematical model is applied to simulate reservoir behavior under the different postulated conditions, and then the alternatives are postulated conditions, and then the alternatives are compared. Methods that evaluate every potential site have also been considered.Henderson et al. used a trial-and-error procedure with a mathematical model to locate new wells in an existing gas storage reservoir. At the same time they searched for the operational stratagem that would yield the desired withdrawal rates. In the reservoir that they studied, they found that the best results were obtained by locating new wells in the low-deliverability parts of the reservoir, attempting to maximize the distance between wells, and turning the wells on in groups, with the low-delivery wells turned on first.Coats suggested a multiple trial method for determining well locations for a producing field. SPEJ P. 44


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document