Obstetric Hospitalists: Impact on the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Rate [24Q]

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 187S-187S ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori A. Boardman ◽  
Maryam Zeinomar ◽  
Valerie Hale
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 345-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Robinson ◽  
Daniela Carusi ◽  
Sarah Little ◽  
Sarah Easter

Objective The objective of this study was to test whether hospitals experienced in twin delivery have lower rates of cesarean delivery for twins. Methods We divided obstetric hospitals in the 2011 National Inpatient Sample by quartile of annual twin deliveries and compared twin cesarean delivery rates between hospitals with weighted linear regression. We used Pearson's coefficients to correlate a hospital's twin cesarean delivery rate to its overall cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates. Results Annual twin delivery volume ranged from 1 to 506 across the 547 analyzed hospitals with a median of 10 and mode of 3. Adjusted rates of cesarean delivery were independent of delivery volume with a rate of 75.5 versus 74.8% in the lowest and highest volume hospitals (p = 0.09 across quartiles). A hospital's cesarean delivery rate for twins moderately correlated with the overall cesarean rate (r = 0.52, p < 0.01) and inversely correlated with VBAC rate (r =  − 0.42, p < 0.01). Conclusion Most U.S. obstetrical units perform a low volume of twin deliveries with no decrease in cesarean delivery rates at higher volume hospitals. Twin cesarean delivery rates correlate with other obstetric parameters such as singleton cesarean delivery and VBAC rates suggesting twin cesarean delivery rate is more closely related to a hospital's general obstetric practice than its twin delivery volume.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehab Abdelhamid Aboshama ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhakim ◽  
Mohammad Abrar Shareef ◽  
Abdulhadi A. AlAmodi ◽  
Mohammad Sunoqrot ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy between high dose and low dose oxytocin administration for labor augmentation.MethodsWe searched for the available studies during March 2020 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of science. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed safety and efficacy of high dose vs. low dose oxytocin for labor augmentation were considered. The extracted data were entered into RevMan software. Dichotomous and continuous data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) respectively, with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our main outcomes were cesarean delivery rate, spontaneous vaginal delivery rate, uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole, and labor duration from oxytocin infusion.ResultsEight RCTs with 3,154 patients were included. High dose oxytocin did not reduce cesarean delivery rate compared to low dose oxytocin (OR=0.76, 95% CI [0.52, 1.10], p=0.15). After solving the reported heterogeneity, high dose oxytocin did not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries vs. low dose oxytocin (OR=1.06, 95% CI [0.84, 1.32], p=0.64). Low dose oxytocin was linked to a significant decline in uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole (p>0.001). A reduction in labor duration was found in high dose oxytocin group over low oxytocin regimen (MD=−1.02 h, 95% CI [−1.77, −0.27], p=0.008).ConclusionsWe found no advantages for high dose oxytocin over low dose oxytocin in labor augmentation except in reducing labor duration. Low dose oxytocin is safer as it decreases the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole. More trials are needed to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cegolon ◽  
G. Mastrangelo ◽  
G. Maso ◽  
G. Dal Pozzo ◽  
L. Ronfani ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document