Fluoroscopically Assisted Percutaneous Translaminar Facet Screw Fixation Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Report

Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 838-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Shik Shim ◽  
Sang-Ho Lee ◽  
Byungjoo Jung ◽  
Palanisamy Sivasabaapathi ◽  
Sun-Hee Park ◽  
...  
Spine ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (16) ◽  
pp. 1731-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Phillips ◽  
Ben Cunningham ◽  
Gerard Carandang ◽  
Alexander J. Ghanayem ◽  
Leonard Voronov ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
Ensor Transfeldt ◽  
Esat Kiter ◽  
Timothy Garvey ◽  
Amir Mehbod ◽  
Manuel Pinto

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jee Soo Jang ◽  
Sang Ho Lee ◽  
Sang Rak Lim

Because the degree of immediate stabilization provided by cage-assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been shown by several studies to be inadequate, supplementary posterior fixation, such as that created by translaminar or transpedicle screw fixation, is necessary. In this study, the authors studied the ALIF-augmentation procedure in which a special guide device is used to place percutaneously translaminar facet screws in 18 patients with degenerative lumbar disease. The minimum follow-up period was 1 month (mean 6 months, range 1–13 months). Degenerative spondylolisthesis with foraminal stenosis was diagnosed in nine patients, associated degenerative disc disease alone or combined with foraminal stenosis in eight, and recurrent disc herniation in one. Following screw placement, computerized tomography scanning was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the facet screw positioning. All screws were properly placed. No screw penetrated the spinal canal or injured the neural structures. Excellent or good clinical outcomes were demonstrated in all patients at the last follow up. The use of this guide device for post—ALIF percutaneous translaminar facet screw fixation represents a safe, accurate, and minimally invasive modality with which to achieve immediate solid fixation in the lumbar spine.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tann A. Nichols ◽  
Brenda K. Yantzer ◽  
Suzanne Alameda ◽  
Wesley M. Johnson ◽  
Bernard H. Guiot

Object Posterior pedicle screw (PS) instrumentation is often used to augment anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) but at the cost of an increase in the morbidity rate due to the second approach and screw placement. If anterior plates were found to be biomechanically equivalent to PS fixation (PSF) after ALIF, then this second approach could be avoided without decreasing vertebral stability. Methods Eight cadaveric L5–S1 spinal segments were tested under four conditions: intact, following anterior discectomy and interbody spacer placement, after placement of an anterior plate, and following PSF. The elastic zone and stiffness were calculated for axial compression, flexion/extension, lateral bending, and torsion. Neither anterior plate stabilization nor PSF showed significant intergroup differences in stiffness or the elastic zone. Both exhibited greater stiffness in flexion than the intact specimens (p < 0.001). Pedicle screw fixation was associated with a decreased elastic zone in lateral bending compared with the intact specimen (p < 0.04). Conclusions Anterior plate fixation is biomechanically similar to PSF following ALIF. Surgeons may wish to use anterior plates in place of PSs to avoid the need for a posterior procedure. This may lead to a decrease in operative morbidity and improved overall outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document