scholarly journals Informed Consent and Informed Decision-Making in High-Risk Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making

scholarly journals Informed Consent and Informed Decision-Making in High-Risk Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Long ◽  
Angela M. Ingraham ◽  
Elizabeth M. Wendt ◽  
Megan C. Saucke ◽  
Courtney Balentine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making

Informed Consent and Advance Directives

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Jay M. Baruch
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Popular Belief

Contrary to popular belief, a patient’s signature on a piece of paper does not constitute informed consent. This article describes the ethical framework of consent in the context of the larger process of informed decision making. The elements of informed consent are examined in practical terms. Common pitfalls are addressed, with strategies to help anticipate and resolve possible dilemmas. These important tools are integral to all levels of medical decision making, including those at the end of life. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(2): 198-205, 2004)

Teaching sustainability-informed decision-making based on high-risk dam failure case study

CIM Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-281
Author(s):  
D. Beneteau ◽  
K. Chovan ◽  
P. Hughes ◽  
S. Gauthier
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Dam Failure ◽  
Informed Decision Making

Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziza Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
First Amendment ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Factual Information ◽  
Misleading Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Crisis Pregnancy

Shifting laws and regulations increasingly displace the centrality of women’s needs in the provision of abortion services. Lawmakers and judges contribute to this environment in two ways: by protecting the right of “Crisis Pregnancy Centers” (CPCs) to give false and misleading information about abortion and by supporting legislation mandating that abortion providers give misleading and unnecessary information for the purposes of informed consent. Litigation on informed consent is further complicated through the mobilization of facts — such as the gestational age or sonogram of the fetus — delivered with the intent to dissuade women from accessing abortion. In other words, factual information utilized for ideological purpose.First Amendment litigation has done little to help prioritize women’s access to appropriate information about abortion that is calibrated to their needs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document