Handling Head Pain

Brain & Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Stacey Colino
Keyword(s):  
Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 667-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Sjaastad ◽  
TA Fredriksen

The influence of pregnancy upon the head pain of cervicogenic headache (CEH) has been studied in 14 patients (number of pregnancies 25). Migraine was used as control group ( n = 49; number of pregnancies 116). CEH was diagnosed according to The Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group guidelines. Migraine was diagnosed according to International Headache Society (IHS) guidelines; a further requirement was that at least eight of nine solitary IHS diagnostic requirements of migraine were present. In 79%—or more—of CEH patients, attacks seemed to appear just as usual during pregnancy; in one patient, attacks stopped completely, and in two there may have been a minor reduction of attacks. A significantly lower number of migraine patients (up to 18%) were more or less uninfluenced by pregnancy (CEH vs. migraine P < 0.0001, X2 test). The lack of response to pregnancy may be a sort of biological marker in CEH. It may also help in clinically distinguishing CEH from migraine when CEH starts early in life, i.e. prior to pregnancies.


JAMA ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 272 (13) ◽  
pp. 1076
Author(s):  
Dhirendra S. Bana
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
A. Zh. Bayalieva ◽  
R. Ya. Shpaner ◽  
I. R. Ganeeva

The study was conducted to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness a transdermal therapeutic system with fentanyl and gabapentin in the treatment of headache in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. When assessing the intensity of headache in patients, it was found that with severe pain immediately after endovascular occlusion, the use of transdermal fentanyl with dexketoprofen or paracetamol is most acceptable, and the combination of gabapentin with dexketoprofen / paracetamol is better in case of headache in a more delayed period.


Author(s):  
E. K. Annai ◽  

Fixation and assignment of labels to specific semantic derivation cases, namely metaphorical expressives (expressive lexical units) in Tuvan dictionaries, are considered and compared with their Russian equivalents. The Russian language influence on the semantic structure of the Tuvan lexemes is observed. Metaphorical expressives are lexemes formed by metaphorical derivation resulting in new (figurative) meanings without changing the form. The number of such units in the colloquial speech was found to increase under the Russian language influence in recent decades. New formation models non-typical for Tuvan but common in Russian have appeared. Also, the calques of Russian expressives based on models absent in Tuvan were found: bash aaryy (lit.: head pain) → “person or problem causing emotional pain or frustration to the speaker” from Russian golovnaya bol’ with the same meaning. The analysis showed Tuvan dictionaries not to reflect this phenomenon sufficiently, i.e., word figurative meanings, namely metaphorical expressives, are not represented there broadly enough. It may be because the labels marking certain words’ usage areas, particularly the label razg. (colloquial speech) is used rather liberally since the stylistic differentiation process is still ongoing in standard Tuvan. While actively used in oral colloquial speech, most expressive meanings of polysemantic words revealed in the study are not found in Tuvan dictionaries. In Russian, there are special colloquial dictionaries, as well as regional dictionaries with stylistic labels. There are no such dictionaries in Tuvan, mostly due to its vague stylistic differentiation. However, the Tuvan language is still evolving, with dictionaries updated accordingly.


1949 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-240
Author(s):  
&NA;
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Joseph ◽  
Gregory Renner
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
Ugo Capurso
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document