POSITIVE PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY AND NEGATIVE DONOR-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES WERE ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION IN PATIENTS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Objective: Dialysis or renal transplantation are the two treatment options for end-stage renal disease patients. Renal transplantation from an appropriate donor increases survival and quality of life compared to treatment with dialysis. Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy have significantly improved the success in 1-year graft survival. However, the long-term graft survival remains the same. Therefore, we aimed to determine the underlying causes and risk factors of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. Materials and Methods: From 2000 to 2012, all consecutive renal transplant recipients followed in our tertiary referral center who underwent renal biopsy due to an increase in serum creatinine level were enrolled. Etiologies of chronic allograft dysfunction were assessed according to pathologic results of renal biopsy specimens and laboratory findings. The immunological and non-immunological risk factors of chronic allograft dysfunction were screened and recorded retrospectively. Results: Eighty (80) renal transplant recipients with a mean age of 38±10 years were included in the study. Delayed graft function (p=0.007), history of acute rejection (p<0.001), positive panel reactive antibody (p=0.033) (Class I (p=0.013), Class II (p=0.006)), positive donor specific antibodies (p=0.001), number of recurrent acute rejections (p<0.001), number of human leukocyte antigens mismatches (p=0.051), cold ischemia time (p=0.001) were found to be risk factors for chronic allograft dysfunction. The donor specific antibodies positivity (p<0.001) and the panel reactive antibody positivity (Class I (p=0.003), Class II (p=0.001)) were significantly higher in patients with antibody mediated rejection than patients without antibody mediated rejection (p=0.002). Conclusion: Delayed graft function, presence and the number of acute rejections, increased cold ischemia time, panel reactive antibody positivity, donor specific antibodies positivity, and the number of human leukocyte antigens mismatches were risk factors for chronic allograft dysfunction.

Download Full-text

Pretransplant Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody in the Absence of Donor-Specific Antibody and Kidney Allograft Survival

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ◽

10.2215/cjn.13640820 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. 275-283

Author(s):

James H. Lan ◽

Matthew Kadatz ◽

Doris T. Chang ◽

Jagbir Gill ◽

Howard M. Gebel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Confidence Interval ◽

Specific Antibody ◽

Graft Loss ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Transplant Recipients ◽

Allograft Survival ◽

Specific Antibodies ◽

Panel Reactive Antibody ◽

Donor Specific Antibodies ◽

Reactive Antibody

Background and objectivesPanel reactive antibody informs the likelihood of finding an HLA-compatible donor for transplant candidates, but has historically been associated with acute rejection and allograft survival because testing methods could not exclude the presence of concomitant donor-specific antibodies. Despite new methods to exclude donor-specific antibodies, panel reactive antibody continues to be used to determine the choice of induction and maintenance immunosuppression. The study objective was to determine the clinical relevance of panel reactive antibody in the absence of donor-specific antibodies.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsRetrospective observational study of kidney allograft survival among 4058 zero HLA-A–, B-, DR-, and DQB1-mismatched transplant recipients without antibodies to donor kidney antigens encoded by these HLA gene loci.ResultsAmong 4058 first and repeat transplant recipients, patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 1%–97% were not at higher risk of transplant failure, compared with patients with cPRA of 0% (death censored graft loss: hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.41). Patients with cPRA ≥98% had a higher risk of graft loss from any cause including death (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.79) and death censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.49). In stratified analyses, the higher risk of graft loss among patients with cPRA ≥98% was only observed among repeat, but not first, transplant recipients. In subgroup analysis, there was no association between cPRA and graft loss among living related transplant recipients.ConclusionsCalculated panel reactive antibody is poorly associated with post-transplant immune reactivity to the allograft in the absence of donor-specific antibody.PodcastThis article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_01_25_CJN13640820_final.mp3

Download Full-text

P1785KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION ACROSS VERY HIGH DONOR SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES(DSA) - A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE OF A TERTIARY LEVEL HOSPITAL FROM INDIA

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation ◽

10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.p1785 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

Jayanta Kumar Hota

Keyword(s):

Kidney Transplantation ◽

Serum Creatinine ◽

Graft Function ◽

Hla Antigens ◽

Class Ii ◽

Class I ◽

Specific Antibodies ◽

Donor Specific Antibodies ◽

Very High ◽

High Donor

Abstract Background and Aims Kidney Transplantation across very high donor specific antibodies (DSA) poses a significant challenge even today . With our current understanding and precise desensitization techniques, we are now able to do kidney transplantation across such high DSA . Here we are reporting ten such cases where baseline DSA were more than 10,000 mean fluroscent intensity (MFI) on Single Antigen Bead (SBA) Luminex. Method: It is a retrospective analiysis of ten kidney transplant patients from January 2017 to March 2019 . Patients with MFI more than 10,000 to class II HLA antigens at baseline with negative CDC and flow cytometry cross match were included in this study. All patients were treated with 1 dose of Rituximab (375mg/M? before plasma exchanges (PLEX) were started . Each session of PLEX was followed by 10 grams of intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIg). Solid based SBA Luminex for both class I and II antigens was repeated after the third exchange and fifth exchange and seventh exchange depending on the level of MFI . Results Ten patients ( seven males three females ) of age 37± 7 years were included in this study . History of blood transfusion with 5±2 units was present in 7 patients . All females were multiparous ( 3±1children). Mean solid based SBA Luminex for class I HLA antigens was 12000 ± 1500 and for II HLA antigens with MFI 16500 ± 3500 (Chart 1). Mean number of PLEX needed was 5 ± 2 . All patients had solid based SBA MFI was 1500±300 and for class II antigens 2500 ± 1500 before transplantation(Chart 2).There was no incidence of acute antibody mediated rejection . Baseline serum creatinine at discharge was1.35±0.35mg%. There were 3 (30%) biopsy proven cases of acute cellular rejection . There was evidence of BK viremia in 3(30%) patients, CMV infection in 1 (10%) patient, Klebsiella pneumonia in 1(10%) patient and cryptosporium infection in 1 (10%) patient each . There was no mortality and mean serum creatinine at 6 months follow-up was 1.55±1.05mg%. All 3 patients of BK Viremia were treated with modification of immunosupression with substitution of leflunamide for mycophenolate and all are doing well with good graft function with a mean serum creatinine of 1.75±0.55mg% . Other infections were treated accordingly. Conclusion: Transplantation across very high donor specific antibodies is possible with excellent immediate and short term graft function with judicious de-sensitization techniques . There was increase in infection rate but none was life threatening and can be managed with proper care.

Download Full-text