Pain Management Modalities after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi ◽  
Dimitris Mavridis ◽  
Daniel I. Sessler ◽  
Megan S. Nunemaker ◽  
Khaled S. Doais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Lumbar Plexus ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Periarticular Infiltration

Abstract Background Optimal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty remains challenging. Many modalities have been used, including peripheral nerve block, periarticular infiltration, and epidural analgesia. However, the relative efficacy of various modalities remains unknown. The authors aimed to quantify and rank order the efficacy of available analgesic modalities for various clinically important outcomes. Methods The authors searched multiple databases, each from inception until July 15, 2016. The authors used random-effects network meta-analysis. For measurements repeated over time, such as pain, the authors considered all time points to enhance reliability of the overall effect estimate. Outcomes considered included pain scores, opioid consumption, rehabilitation profile, quality of recovery, and complications. The authors defined the optimal modality as the one that best balanced pain scores, opioid consumption, and range of motion in the initial 72 postoperative hours. Results The authors identified 170 trials (12,530 patients) assessing 17 treatment modalities. Overall inconsistency and heterogeneity were acceptable. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, the best five for pain at rest were femoral/obturator, femoral/sciatic/obturator, lumbar plexus/sciatic, femoral/sciatic, and fascia iliaca compartment blocks. For reducing opioid consumption, the best five were femoral/sciatic/obturator, femoral/obturator, lumbar plexus/sciatic, lumbar plexus, and femoral/sciatic blocks. The best modality for range of motion was femoral/sciatic blocks. Femoral/sciatic and femoral/obturator blocks best met our criteria for optimal performance. Considering only high-quality studies, femoral/sciatic seemed best. Conclusions Blocking multiple nerves was preferable to blocking any single nerve, periarticular infiltration, or epidural analgesia. The combination of femoral and sciatic nerve block appears to be the overall best approach. Rehabilitation parameters remain markedly understudied.

Comparison of Periarticular Infiltration and Combination Delivery of Local Anesthetics for Reducing Pain and Opioid Consumption after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek T. Ward ◽  
Eva Grotkopp ◽  
Robert C. Detch ◽  
Hubert T. Kim ◽  
Alfred C. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Periarticular Infiltration

AbstractSurgical-site delivery of local anesthetics decreases pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal route of administration is unknown. We compared local anesthetic delivery using periarticular soft-tissue infiltration to delivery using a combination of preimplantation immersion and intra-articular injection (combination treatment). The records of patients who underwent unilateral, cemented, primary TKA with spinal anesthesia and adductor canal blocks at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Three subgroups were compared, including controls who did not receive additional local anesthetics, patients who received periarticular infiltration, and patients who received combination treatment. Mean daily pain scores and mean 24-hour opioid consumption on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 1 were calculated, and analysis of variance was used to assess for significant differences. Factors that were associated with lower pain scores and opioid consumption were then identified using multivariate stepwise regression. There were 26 controls, 25 periarticular infiltration patients, and 39 combination patients. The periarticular infiltration cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on POD 0, but not on POD 1. The combination cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on PODs 0 and 1. There were no significant differences between the infiltration and combination groups on either day. Multivariate regression analysis showed that infiltration was associated with significantly decreased opioid consumption on both days and decreased pain on POD 0. Combination treatment was associated with significantly decreased pain and opioid consumption on both days. Both local anesthetic periarticular infiltration and combination treatment are associated with decreased pain and opioid consumption after TKA. The stronger effects of the combination treatment compared with periarticular infiltration on POD 1 suggests that combination delivery may have a longer duration of action.

Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block vs Combined Femoral and Periarticular Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1806-1811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devendra Mahadevan ◽  
Richard P. Walter ◽  
Gary Minto ◽  
Thomas C. Gale ◽  
Christoph J. McAllen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Sciatic Nerve Block ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Periarticular Infiltration

A Three-arm Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Continuous Femoral Plus Single-injection Sciatic Peripheral Nerve Blocks versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam W. Amundson ◽  
Rebecca L. Johnson ◽  
Matthew P. Abdel ◽  
Carlos B. Mantilla ◽  
Jason K. Panchamia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Multimodal analgesia is standard practice for total knee arthroplasty; however, the role of regional techniques in improved perioperative outcomes remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that peripheral nerve blockade would result in lower pain scores and opioid consumption than two competing periarticular injection solutions. Methods This three-arm, nonblinded trial randomized 165 adults undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty to receive (1) femoral catheter plus sciatic nerve blocks, (2) ropivacaine-based periarticular injection, or (3) liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection. Primary outcome was maximal pain during postoperative day 1 (0 to 10, numerical pain rating scale) in intention-to-treat analysis. Additional outcomes included pain scores and opioid consumption for postoperative days 0 to 2 and 3 months. Results One hundred fifty-seven study patients received peripheral nerve block (n = 50), ropivacaine (n = 55), or liposomal bupivacaine (n = 52) and reported median maximal pain scores on postoperative day 1 of 3, 4, and 4.5 and on postoperative day 0 of 1, 4, and 5, respectively (average pain scores for postoperative day 0: 0.6, 1.7, and 2.4 and postoperative day 1: 2.5, 3.5, and 3.7). Postoperative day 1 median maximal pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve blockade compared to liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection (P = 0.016; Hodges–Lehmann median difference [95% CI] = −1 [−2 to 0]). After postanesthesia care unit discharge, postoperative day 0 median maximal and average pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve block compared to both periarticular injections (ropivacaine: maximal −2 [−3 to −1]; P < 0.001; average −0.8 [−1.3 to −0.2]; P = 0.003; and liposomal bupivacaine: maximal −3 [−4 to −2]; P < 0.001; average −1.4 [−2.0 to −0.8]; P < 0.001). Conclusions Ropivacaine-based periarticular injections provide pain control comparable on postoperative days 1 and 2 to a femoral catheter and single-injection sciatic nerve block. This study did not demonstrate an advantage of liposomal bupivacaine over ropivacaine in periarticular injections for total knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Incidence of Suture-Method Catheter Dislocation with Femoral Nerve Block and Femoral Triangle Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 6687
Author(s):  
Bulat Tuyakov ◽  
Mateusz Kruszewski ◽  
Lidia Glinka ◽  
Oksana Klonowska ◽  
Michal Borys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Femoral Triangle ◽  
Group 1

Catheter dislocation with continuous peripheral nerve blocks represents a major problem in clinical settings. There is a range of factors affecting the incidence of catheter dislocation, including catheter type. This study aimed to assess the incidence of suture-method catheter (SMC) dislocation 24 h after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) and continuous femoral triangle block (CFTB), respectively. In the prospective randomized trial, 40 patients qualified for TKA with SMC and were divided into two groups, those who received CFNB (Group 1, n = 20) and those who received CFTB (Group 2, n = 20). After 24 h, the degree of catheter displacement (cm), pain intensity (NRS) and opioid consumption (mg) was assessed. The catheter dislocation rates were found to be 15% in Group 1 versus 5% in Group 2, with the catheter dislocated by 0.83 cm (SD = ±0.87) and 0.43 cm (SD = ±0.67), respectively. There were no differences in NRS score (p = 0.86) or opioid consumption (p = 0.16) between the groups. In each case, a displaced catheter was successfully repositioned by pulling, which clinically resulted in a lower NRS score. The results of the study suggest that CFTB with SMC may be used after TKA with a good effect, as it is associated with low catheter dislocation rates and an adequate analgesic effect.

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Gerard Zak ◽  
David Yeroushalmi ◽  
Alex Tang ◽  
Morteza Meftah ◽  
Erik Schnaser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractThe use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT (n = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort (n = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes; p = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar (p = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.006) and 1 month (p = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months (p = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times (p = 0.610) and pain scores (p = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.092), 1 month (p = 0.058), and 3 months (p = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.

Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Opioid Requirements for Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Laminectomy, Hysterectomy, and Abdominoplasty Procedures

2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871986764
Author(s):  
J. Lacie Bradford ◽  
Beatrice Turner ◽  
Megan A. Van Berkel
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: Opioid use postoperatively has been linked to adverse events and an increase in opioid dependency. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative pain control on total opioid consumption, pain control, serious opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), and hospital length of stay (LOS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures when compared with a control group. Methods: Patients receiving LB from August 1, 2017, to February 1, 2018, for the aforementioned procedures were included for evaluation, and patients undergoing similar procedures who did not receive LB served as the control group. The principal outcome was opioid consumption through postoperative day 5 or discharge, whichever came first, assessed by morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included pain scores within 72 hours postoperation, hospital LOS, and serious ORAEs. Results: A total of 323 patients were identified for inclusion in the study: TKA, n = 144; THA, n = 48; laminectomy, n = 73; hysterectomy, n = 30; and abdominoplasty, n = 28. Liposomal bupivacaine use was associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with alternative therapies with a median 71 MME (25%-75%; interquartile range [IQR] = 32.5-148.5) versus 102 MME (25%-75%; IQR = 57-165), P < .005. However, higher numeric pain scores were reported in the LB group compared with the control group for postoperative day 0 with a median of 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7.4) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4-7) in the control group ( P < .001) and on postoperative day 1 with a median of 6 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.3-7), P < .001. There was no difference in hospital LOS or ORAEs. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis of pain management after TKA, THA, laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures, patients receiving LB consumed significantly less opioid medications. However, this was not associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain scores, hospital LOS, or serious ORAEs.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for the Management of Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients at a 287-Bed Community Hospital

2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872096542
Author(s):  
Abdus-Samad Syed Minhaj ◽  
Ashley Marie Skipper ◽  
Mckenna Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee

Introduction: Geriatric patients receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are found to have similar postoperative complications, functional scores, and perioperative mortality, as compared to younger patients. Conversely, geriatric patients often have longer lengths of stay. Periarticular injection (PAI) of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) as part of the multimodal pain management strategy is thought to improve recovery, however, mixed comparative efficacy data exists for its use in TKA.2-5. Methods: A retrospective, chart review was conducted at a 287-bed community teaching hospital. Orthopedic surgical patients who received an infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine HCl for unilateral TKA were compared. Patients identified in the electronic medical record by Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) 470—major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without major complication or comorbidity codes were utilized. Patients who meet the following criteria were included: age 65 and older who underwent a TKA between 8/1/2018 to 7/31/2019 were discharged to home. Patients who have contraindications or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine formulations or a history of opioid dependence were excluded. The primary outcome is to identify whether patients who received an infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine had a lower total opioid consumption during their hospital stay. Results: A total of 114 patients who had a DRG 470 code and were above the age of 65 years were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in mean total opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents) between the bupivacaine HCl (n = 25) and liposomal groups (n = 85) respectively, 93.76 versus 83.72 mg; P = .569. In addition, patients in both groups had similar lengths of hospital stay, 2.5 versus 3 days; P = .529 and mean pain scores until discharge 3.7 versus 4.34 on VAS; P = .305. Conclusion: The results of this drug utilization evaluation do not support a strong clinical advantage with local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine over bupivacaine HCl in geriatric patients undergoing primary TKA surgery at this institution. There was not a statistically significant difference in mean total opioid consumption between the 2 groups. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics, mean pain scores, and hospital lengths of stay were similar in both groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document