Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for the Management of Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients at a 287-Bed Community Hospital

2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872096542
Author(s):  
Abdus-Samad Syed Minhaj ◽  
Ashley Marie Skipper ◽  
Mckenna Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee

Introduction: Geriatric patients receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are found to have similar postoperative complications, functional scores, and perioperative mortality, as compared to younger patients. Conversely, geriatric patients often have longer lengths of stay. Periarticular injection (PAI) of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) as part of the multimodal pain management strategy is thought to improve recovery, however, mixed comparative efficacy data exists for its use in TKA.2-5. Methods: A retrospective, chart review was conducted at a 287-bed community teaching hospital. Orthopedic surgical patients who received an infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine HCl for unilateral TKA were compared. Patients identified in the electronic medical record by Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) 470—major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without major complication or comorbidity codes were utilized. Patients who meet the following criteria were included: age 65 and older who underwent a TKA between 8/1/2018 to 7/31/2019 were discharged to home. Patients who have contraindications or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine formulations or a history of opioid dependence were excluded. The primary outcome is to identify whether patients who received an infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine had a lower total opioid consumption during their hospital stay. Results: A total of 114 patients who had a DRG 470 code and were above the age of 65 years were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in mean total opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents) between the bupivacaine HCl (n = 25) and liposomal groups (n = 85) respectively, 93.76 versus 83.72 mg; P = .569. In addition, patients in both groups had similar lengths of hospital stay, 2.5 versus 3 days; P = .529 and mean pain scores until discharge 3.7 versus 4.34 on VAS; P = .305. Conclusion: The results of this drug utilization evaluation do not support a strong clinical advantage with local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine over bupivacaine HCl in geriatric patients undergoing primary TKA surgery at this institution. There was not a statistically significant difference in mean total opioid consumption between the 2 groups. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics, mean pain scores, and hospital lengths of stay were similar in both groups.

Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Opioid Requirements for Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Laminectomy, Hysterectomy, and Abdominoplasty Procedures

2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871986764
Author(s):  
J. Lacie Bradford ◽  
Beatrice Turner ◽  
Megan A. Van Berkel
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: Opioid use postoperatively has been linked to adverse events and an increase in opioid dependency. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative pain control on total opioid consumption, pain control, serious opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), and hospital length of stay (LOS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures when compared with a control group. Methods: Patients receiving LB from August 1, 2017, to February 1, 2018, for the aforementioned procedures were included for evaluation, and patients undergoing similar procedures who did not receive LB served as the control group. The principal outcome was opioid consumption through postoperative day 5 or discharge, whichever came first, assessed by morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included pain scores within 72 hours postoperation, hospital LOS, and serious ORAEs. Results: A total of 323 patients were identified for inclusion in the study: TKA, n = 144; THA, n = 48; laminectomy, n = 73; hysterectomy, n = 30; and abdominoplasty, n = 28. Liposomal bupivacaine use was associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with alternative therapies with a median 71 MME (25%-75%; interquartile range [IQR] = 32.5-148.5) versus 102 MME (25%-75%; IQR = 57-165), P < .005. However, higher numeric pain scores were reported in the LB group compared with the control group for postoperative day 0 with a median of 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7.4) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4-7) in the control group ( P < .001) and on postoperative day 1 with a median of 6 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.3-7), P < .001. There was no difference in hospital LOS or ORAEs. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis of pain management after TKA, THA, laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures, patients receiving LB consumed significantly less opioid medications. However, this was not associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain scores, hospital LOS, or serious ORAEs.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce Lengths of Stay and Improve Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. e3-e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morad Chughtai ◽  
Jeffrey Cherian ◽  
Jaydev Mistry ◽  
Randa Elmallah ◽  
Alicia Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Discharge Status ◽  
Total Knee

Comparison of Periarticular Infiltration and Combination Delivery of Local Anesthetics for Reducing Pain and Opioid Consumption after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek T. Ward ◽  
Eva Grotkopp ◽  
Robert C. Detch ◽  
Hubert T. Kim ◽  
Alfred C. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Periarticular Infiltration

AbstractSurgical-site delivery of local anesthetics decreases pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal route of administration is unknown. We compared local anesthetic delivery using periarticular soft-tissue infiltration to delivery using a combination of preimplantation immersion and intra-articular injection (combination treatment). The records of patients who underwent unilateral, cemented, primary TKA with spinal anesthesia and adductor canal blocks at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Three subgroups were compared, including controls who did not receive additional local anesthetics, patients who received periarticular infiltration, and patients who received combination treatment. Mean daily pain scores and mean 24-hour opioid consumption on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 1 were calculated, and analysis of variance was used to assess for significant differences. Factors that were associated with lower pain scores and opioid consumption were then identified using multivariate stepwise regression. There were 26 controls, 25 periarticular infiltration patients, and 39 combination patients. The periarticular infiltration cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on POD 0, but not on POD 1. The combination cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on PODs 0 and 1. There were no significant differences between the infiltration and combination groups on either day. Multivariate regression analysis showed that infiltration was associated with significantly decreased opioid consumption on both days and decreased pain on POD 0. Combination treatment was associated with significantly decreased pain and opioid consumption on both days. Both local anesthetic periarticular infiltration and combination treatment are associated with decreased pain and opioid consumption after TKA. The stronger effects of the combination treatment compared with periarticular infiltration on POD 1 suggests that combination delivery may have a longer duration of action.

Continuous Bupivacaine Infusion versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Hwa Mary Chen ◽  
Andrew G. Yun ◽  
Teresa Fan
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Recovery Room ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractMultimodal pain management for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to enhance functional recovery. Regional anesthesia became a vital component to decrease pain after TKA. Several studies compared femoral versus adductor canal blocks, including evaluating medications that can prolong adductor canal blocks. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and continuous local infusion (OnQ) both extend local anesthetic delivery beyond 24 hours. This superiority study compared the use of OnQ versus LB in adductor canal blocks. A retrospective study was conducted between two cohorts of consecutive patients who received adductor canal blocks with either LB or a continuous ropivacaine infusion catheter. Morphine equivalent dose (MED), pain scores, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between the two groups by using the analysis of covariance test. There were 106 patients in the OnQ group and 146 in the LB group. The OnQ group consumed significantly fewer opioids compared with the LB group in the recovery room (5.7 MED vs. 11.7 MED, p = 0.002) and over the entire hospitalization (the recovery room plus on the floor; 33.3 MED vs. 42.8 MED, p = 0.009). Opioid use between the OnQ and LB group did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.21). The average pain scores at rest and with activity were similar in both groups (p = 0.894, p = 0.882). The LOS between the OnQ and LB groups was not statistically significant (1.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.462). OnQ and LB were equally effective in decreasing opioid consumption on the floor over the averaged 1.3 days of hospitalization; however, the OnQ group significantly reduced opioid use in the recovery room. There was no difference in pain scores or LOS between the two groups. OnQ comparatively prolonged infusion of local anesthetic is a potential edge over LB. This advantage may offset the inconvenience of catheter management and infrequent catheter complications.

A Three-arm Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Continuous Femoral Plus Single-injection Sciatic Peripheral Nerve Blocks versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam W. Amundson ◽  
Rebecca L. Johnson ◽  
Matthew P. Abdel ◽  
Carlos B. Mantilla ◽  
Jason K. Panchamia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Multimodal analgesia is standard practice for total knee arthroplasty; however, the role of regional techniques in improved perioperative outcomes remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that peripheral nerve blockade would result in lower pain scores and opioid consumption than two competing periarticular injection solutions. Methods This three-arm, nonblinded trial randomized 165 adults undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty to receive (1) femoral catheter plus sciatic nerve blocks, (2) ropivacaine-based periarticular injection, or (3) liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection. Primary outcome was maximal pain during postoperative day 1 (0 to 10, numerical pain rating scale) in intention-to-treat analysis. Additional outcomes included pain scores and opioid consumption for postoperative days 0 to 2 and 3 months. Results One hundred fifty-seven study patients received peripheral nerve block (n = 50), ropivacaine (n = 55), or liposomal bupivacaine (n = 52) and reported median maximal pain scores on postoperative day 1 of 3, 4, and 4.5 and on postoperative day 0 of 1, 4, and 5, respectively (average pain scores for postoperative day 0: 0.6, 1.7, and 2.4 and postoperative day 1: 2.5, 3.5, and 3.7). Postoperative day 1 median maximal pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve blockade compared to liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection (P = 0.016; Hodges–Lehmann median difference [95% CI] = −1 [−2 to 0]). After postanesthesia care unit discharge, postoperative day 0 median maximal and average pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve block compared to both periarticular injections (ropivacaine: maximal −2 [−3 to −1]; P &lt; 0.001; average −0.8 [−1.3 to −0.2]; P = 0.003; and liposomal bupivacaine: maximal −3 [−4 to −2]; P &lt; 0.001; average −1.4 [−2.0 to −0.8]; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Ropivacaine-based periarticular injections provide pain control comparable on postoperative days 1 and 2 to a femoral catheter and single-injection sciatic nerve block. This study did not demonstrate an advantage of liposomal bupivacaine over ropivacaine in periarticular injections for total knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Impact of surgeon’s hand and ocular dominance on right and left total knee arthroplasty alignment

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Shizar Goosheh ◽  
Jacalyn Thoren ◽  
Douglas Naudie ◽  
Mathew Teeter ◽  
James Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Left Knee ◽  
Surgical Performance ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Genesis Ii ◽  
Postoperative Knee

Postoperative alignment is an important modifiable confounder that contributes to the longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Studies have shown that surgeon’s handedness can affect surgical performance; however, no studies have assessed the effect of surgeon’s hand or ocular dominance on TKA alignment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgeon’s hand and ocular dominance on coronal plane alignment in TKA. We retrospectively evaluated 138 patients who underwent sequential bilateral TKA by the same surgeon, using the Genesis II PS knee (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN). We assessed postoperative alignment by measuring and comparing anatomical tibiofemoral angle (TFA) bilaterally on standard postoperative knee radiographs, as well as Knee Society function and pain scores to determine any functional differences. Lastly, we evaluated whether a crossed hand-ocular dominant surgeon had greater accuracy when performing a TKA on the side opposite their hand dominance compared to uncrossed hand-ocular dominant surgeons. All surgeons were right-hand dominant and there was a significantly larger anatomical TFA on left TKAs (mean [SD], 4.6° [2.8°]) compared to right TKAs (3.8° [2.5°]) (P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between right and left Knee Society function (P = 0.09) and pain scores (P = 0.86). When comparing left TKAs, surgeons with uncrossed hand-ocular dominance (4.5°) performed with equal accuracy compared to surgeons with crossed hand-ocular dominance (4.8°) (2-tailed test = 0.597), indicating no effect of ocular dominance. In summary, hand but not ocular dominance was shown to have significant postoperative alignment effects on TKA.

Discontinuation of the liposomal delivery of bupivacaine has no effect on pain management after primary total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6 Supple A) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
James E. Feng ◽  
Chibuokem P. Ikwuazom ◽  
Siddharth A. Mahure ◽  
Daniel P. Waren ◽  
James D. Slover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Function ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Injection Protocol ◽  
Total Knee

Aims Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) as part of a periarticular injection protocol continues to be a highly debated topic in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the effect of discontinuing the use of LB in a periarticular protocol on immediate postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and objective functional outcomes. Methods On 1 July 2019, we discontinued the use of intraoperative LB as part of a periarticular injection protocol. A consecutive group of patients who received LB as part of the protocol (Protocol 1) and a subsequent group who did not (Protocol 2) were compared. All patients received the same opioid-sparing protocol. Verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores were collected from our electronic data warehouse and averaged per patient per 12-hour interval. Events relating to the opiate administration were derived as morphine milligram equivalences (MMEs) per patient per 24-hour interval. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) tool was used to assess the immediate postoperative function. Results A total of 888 patients received Protocol 1 and while 789 received Protocol 2. The mean age of the patients was significantly higher in those who did not receive LB (66.80 vs 65.57 years, p = 0.006). The sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, race, smoking status, marital status, operating time, length of stay, and discharge disposition were similar in the two groups. Compared with the LB group, discontinuing LB showed no significant difference in postoperative VRS pain scores up to 72 hours (p > 0.05), opioid administration up to 96 hours (p > 0.05), or AM-PAC scores within the first 24 hours (p > 0.05). Conclusion The control of pain after TKA with a multimodal management protocol is not improved by the addition of LB compared with traditional bupivacaine. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):102–107.

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Gerard Zak ◽  
David Yeroushalmi ◽  
Alex Tang ◽  
Morteza Meftah ◽  
Erik Schnaser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractThe use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT (n = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort (n = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes; p = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar (p = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.006) and 1 month (p = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months (p = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times (p = 0.610) and pain scores (p = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.092), 1 month (p = 0.058), and 3 months (p = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.

Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Compared with Multimodal Periarticular Injections for Postoperative Pain Control following Total Knee Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 979-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Britten ◽  
Jonathan D. Hughes ◽  
Yolanda Munoz Maldonado ◽  
Kirby D. Hitt
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractSingle-dose long-acting periarticular anesthetics have been shown to be an effective method of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study retrospectively compares the efficacy of multimodal periarticular injection consisting of a combination of ropivacaine, duramorph, epinephrine, and toradol (HC) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) periarticular injection in TKA. This study was a retrospective matched comparative chart review of two cohorts of patients who underwent TKA within a single health care system and cared for by one provider. We compared 22 patients who were treated with LB intraoperatively (LBG) with 41 matched controls who were treated with HC periarticular injection (HCG). These cases were retrospectively reviewed at 0 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 24, 24 to 48, and 48 to 72 hours. We reviewed pain scores and opioid use per the preceding time period, total opioid use, length of stay (LOS), and wound complications between the two groups. The two groups showed no statistical difference in total opioids used. In both the 6- to 12-hour and 12- to 24-hour intervals, the LBG required significantly more opioids than the HCG, with p-values of 0.0039 and 0.0061, respectively. Pain scores were not significantly different for any time period. We found no difference in LOS. The LBG tended to have lower doses of antiemetics than the HCG. No significant difference was found in postoperative pain scores and total opioid use between LB and multimodal periarticular intraoperative injections in TKA. Our data demonstrated decreased opioid consumption in the HC group compared with the LB group in both the 6- to 12-hour and 12- to 24-hour time intervals postoperatively. At our institution, LB costs US$314.99, whereas HC costs US$95.

Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine in Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Hwa Mary Chen ◽  
Andrew G. Yun ◽  
Teresa Fan
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Adductor Canal Block ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractAdductor canal block (ACB) is advantageous for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) because it results in minimal motor block. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is Food and Drug Administration-approved extended-release formulation of bupivacaine for interscalene peripheral nerve blocks. Its use is increasing in the TKA setting, mainly as a local infiltration agent. We compared the efficacy of ACB using LB versus ropivacaine in TKA. Two cohorts of patients were retrospectively analyzed at a single institution receiving ropivacaine and LB ACB for TKA. Duration of LB ACB, time to first opioid use postrecovery room, amount of opioid use postrecovery room, length of stay (LOS), and average and highest pain scores were collected. A total of 91 and 142 TKA patients received ropivacaine and LB for ACB, respectively. At 8 hours postrecovery room, more patients in the LB group required no opioids compared with the ropivacaine group (p = 0.026). Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB group than in the ropivacaine group at 8 and 24 hours postrecovery room, although statistical significance was only observed at 8 hours (p = 0.022). The highest pain score for patients in the two groups was not statistically different. The average pain score for patients with a 2-day LOS was higher in the LB group, but average pain scores were similar for patients with 1- and 3-day LOS. Median LOS for the LB and ropivacaine groups was 1 and 2 days, respectively (p < 0.0001). Significantly lower opioid use at 8 hours postrecovery room was seen in the LB group compared with the ropivacaine group. There was no difference in opioid use at 24 and 48 hours. There was also no advantage with LB ACB in decreasing pain scores. However, the LB ACB group demonstrated a significantly shorter LOS compared with the ropivacaine ACB group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document