Indirect Reduction and Strut Support of Proximal Humerus Fractures Using a Titanium Mesh in Elderly Patients

Introduction To date, there is little research assessing the efficacy of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely in the treatment of 2-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with calcar comminution in patients >60 years old with severe osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients with osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with medial column (calcar) instability or disruption who experienced a PHILOS plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely. Materials and Methods One hundred and twelve consecutive elderly patients with severe osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with calcar instability or disruption who were treated with a PHILOS plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely were retrospectively identified from 3 tertiary medical centres during 2014–2019. The primary outcomes were the Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores; secondary outcome was the rate of key orthopaedic complications. Results Median follow-up was 24 (15.3–27.6) months. Significant improvements in the median Constant scores were observed (39 [26–58 points] prior to surgery vs 81 [67–95 points] at final follow-up). The median ASES scores improved from 43 (26–64 points) prior to surgery to 83 (65–96 points) at final follow-up. The percentage of key orthopaedic complications was 25.6% (22/86). Four (4.7%) cases had loss of reduction, 4 (4.7%) experienced aseptic loosening, 1 (.8%) had non-union, 4 (4.7%) suffered a periprosthetic fracture, 3 (3.5%) experienced a revision surgery, 1 (.8%) had a dislocation and 5 (5.8%) suffered an unbearable shoulder pain. Conclusion For elderly patients with osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with calcar instability or disruption, PHILOS plate combined with an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely might have recognisable advantages in decreasing the loss of fixation and preventing medial calcar collapse.

Download Full-text

Mortality After Complex Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment With Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation ◽

10.1177/2151459318795241 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

pp. 215145931879524 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Dani Rotman ◽

Ornit Giladi ◽

Adi Berliner Senderey ◽

Alison Dallich ◽

Oleg Dolkart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Treatment ◽

Treatment Group ◽

Conservative Treatment ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Proximal Humerus ◽

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Proximal Humerus Fractures ◽

Humerus Fractures ◽

Reverse Total Shoulder

Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are a common fragility fracture and have been shown to increase mortality in elderly patients. In the last decade, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was introduced as a reliable operative treatment option for this indication. In other fragility fractures, most notably hip fractures, urgent surgical treatment can reduce mortality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with RTSA can reduce 1-year mortality in elderly patients with complex displaced PHFs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed to compare 1-year mortality between 2 groups of elderly patients (>75 years old) who presented to a level 1 trauma center emergency department with complex displaced PHFs. The conservative treatment group (n = 83; mean age, 83.7 years) presented from 2008 to 2010 when RTSA was not yet available, and treatment was nonoperative. The surgical treatment group (n = 62; mean age, 82.2 years) presented from 2012 to 2015 and underwent RTSA. Results: One-year mortality was 8.1% (male 7.1%; female 8.3%) in the surgical treatment group and 10.8% (male 18.8%; female 9.0%) in the conservative treatment group. The reduction in mortality in the surgical treatment group was not significant (entire cohort P = .56; males P = .35; females P = .59). Discussion: Recent studies failed to show better functional results after surgical treatment with RTSA when compared to conservative treatment. This study suggests that a benefit of surgical treatment with RTSA that was not examined until now might exist—a reduction in the increased mortality risk associated with PHFs. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the groups, although there was a trend showing lower mortality with RTSA, mostly in men. Further studies with larger populations and longer follow-up times are needed to determine whether this trend is of clinical significance.

Download Full-text