scholarly journals Mortality After Complex Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment With Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145931879524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dani Rotman ◽  
Ornit Giladi ◽  
Adi Berliner Senderey ◽  
Alison Dallich ◽  
Oleg Dolkart ◽  
...  

Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are a common fragility fracture and have been shown to increase mortality in elderly patients. In the last decade, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was introduced as a reliable operative treatment option for this indication. In other fragility fractures, most notably hip fractures, urgent surgical treatment can reduce mortality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with RTSA can reduce 1-year mortality in elderly patients with complex displaced PHFs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed to compare 1-year mortality between 2 groups of elderly patients (>75 years old) who presented to a level 1 trauma center emergency department with complex displaced PHFs. The conservative treatment group (n = 83; mean age, 83.7 years) presented from 2008 to 2010 when RTSA was not yet available, and treatment was nonoperative. The surgical treatment group (n = 62; mean age, 82.2 years) presented from 2012 to 2015 and underwent RTSA. Results: One-year mortality was 8.1% (male 7.1%; female 8.3%) in the surgical treatment group and 10.8% (male 18.8%; female 9.0%) in the conservative treatment group. The reduction in mortality in the surgical treatment group was not significant (entire cohort P = .56; males P = .35; females P = .59). Discussion: Recent studies failed to show better functional results after surgical treatment with RTSA when compared to conservative treatment. This study suggests that a benefit of surgical treatment with RTSA that was not examined until now might exist—a reduction in the increased mortality risk associated with PHFs. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the groups, although there was a trend showing lower mortality with RTSA, mostly in men. Further studies with larger populations and longer follow-up times are needed to determine whether this trend is of clinical significance.

Orthopedics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. e982-e989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean S. Rajaee ◽  
Dheeraj Yalamanchili ◽  
Naudereh Noori ◽  
Eytan Debbi ◽  
James Mirocha ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. e703-e708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant E. Garrigues ◽  
Peter S. Johnston ◽  
Matthew D. Pepe ◽  
Bradford S. Tucker ◽  
Matthew L. Ramsey ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Dillon ◽  
Heather A. Prentice ◽  
William E. Burfeind ◽  
Priscilla H. Chan ◽  
Ronald A. Navarro

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052093124
Author(s):  
Xiulan Han ◽  
Jintao Zhuang ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Yixin Gao ◽  
Mingdong Zhao ◽  
...  

Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) following failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Methods This retrospective study identified all patients that had a documented failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures treated with revision HSA or RTSA. Follow-up occurred at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and every year thereafter. The primary outcomes were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and the University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA SRS) scores. The secondary outcome was the rate of major complications. Results A total of 126 patients (126 shoulders) were enrolled in the study. At the final follow-up, the RTSA group had significantly greater improvements in ASES, SST and UCLA SRS scores than the HSA group. The RTSA group had significantly larger decreases in the VAS pain score compared with the HSA group. The rate of major complications was significantly higher in the HSA group than in the RTSA group (44.4% versus 27.5%, respectively). Conclusion RTSA provided superior functional outcomes compared with HSA, with a lower rate of major complications after a follow-up period of at least 5 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document