Management of Pediatric Type I Open Fractures in the Emergency Department or Operating Room

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 372-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna Godfrey ◽  
Paul D. Choi ◽  
Lior Shabtai ◽  
Sarah B. Nossov ◽  
Amy Williams ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Guzman ◽  
Crystal Coleman ◽  
Adam D. Rubin ◽  
Joseph Belanger ◽  
Cristina Jackson-Menaldi

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Gil ◽  
Avi D. Goodman ◽  
Andrew P. Harris ◽  
Neill Y. Li ◽  
Arnold-Peter C. Weiss

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the comparative cost-effectiveness of performing initial revision finger amputation in the emergency department (ED) versus in the operating room (OR) accounting for need for unplanned secondary revision in the OR. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients presenting to the ED with traumatic finger and thumb amputations from January 2010 to December 2015. Only those treated with primarily revision amputation were included. Following initial management, the need for unplanned reoperation was assessed and associated with setting of initial management. A sensitivity analysis was used to determine the cost-effectiveness threshold for initial management in the ED versus the OR. Results: Five hundred thirty-seven patients had 677 fingertip amputations, of whom 91 digits were initially primarily revised in the OR, and 586 digits were primarily revised in the ED. Following initial revision, 91 digits required unplanned secondary revision. The unplanned secondary revision rates were similar between settings: 13.7% digits from the ED and 12.1% of digits from the OR ( P = .57). When accounting for direct costs, an incidence of unplanned revision above 77.0% after initial revision fingertip amputation in the ED would make initial revision fingertip amputation in the OR cost-effective. Therefore, based on the unplanned secondary revision rate, initial management in the ED is more cost-effective than in the OR. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the incidence of unplanned/secondary revision of fingertip amputation rate after the initial procedure was performed in the ED versus the OR.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Levin Garip ◽  
Angela L. Balocco ◽  
Sam Van Boxstael

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Bazzi ◽  
Jaysson T. Brooks ◽  
Amit Jain ◽  
Michael C. Ain ◽  
John E. Tis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nofar Ben Basat ◽  
Raviv Allon ◽  
Ahmad Nagmi ◽  
Ronit Wollstein

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 108???109
Author(s):  
D. P. BLAKE ◽  
V. L. GISBERT ◽  
A. L. NEY ◽  
H. K. HELSETH ◽  
D. W. PLUMMER ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo B. V. Fontes ◽  
Adam P. Smith ◽  
Lorenzo F. Muñoz ◽  
Richard W. Byrne ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis

Object Early postoperative head CT scanning is routinely performed following intracranial procedures for detection of complications, but its real value remains uncertain: so-called abnormal results are frequently found, but active, emergency intervention based on these findings may be rare. The authors' objective was to analyze whether early postoperative CT scans led to emergency surgical interventions and if the results of neurological examination predicted this occurrence. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed 892 intracranial procedures followed by an early postoperative CT scan performed over a 1-year period at Rush University Medical Center and classified these cases according to postoperative neurological status: baseline, predicted neurological change, unexpected neurological change, and sedated or comatose. The interpretation of CT results was reviewed and unexpected CT findings were classified based on immediate action taken: Type I, additional observation and CT; Type II, active nonsurgical intervention; and Type III, surgical intervention. Results were compared between neurological examination groups with the Fisher exact test. Results Patients with unexpected neurological changes or in the sedated or comatose group had significantly more unexpected findings on the postoperative CT (p < 0.001; OR 19.2 and 2.3, respectively) and Type II/III interventions (p < 0.001) than patients at baseline. Patients at baseline or with expected neurological changes still had a rate of Type II/III changes in the 2.2%–2.4% range; however, no patient required an immediate return to the operating room. Conclusions Over a 1-year period in an academic neurosurgery service, no patient who was neurologically intact or who had a predicted neurological change required an immediate return to the operating room based on early postoperative CT findings. Obtaining early CT scans should not be a priority in these patients and may even be cancelled in favor of MRI studies, if the latter have already been planned and can be performed safely and in a timely manner. Early postoperative CT scanning does not assure an uneventful course, nor should it replace accurate and frequent neurological checks, because operative interventions were always decided in conjunction with the neurological examination.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 939-943
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn M. Van Der Wilden ◽  
Sumbal Janjua ◽  
Suzanne K. Wedel ◽  
Suresh Agarwal ◽  
Mark L. Shapiro ◽  
...  

Presented September 24, 2011, at the 92nd annual meeting of the New England Surgical Society, September 23–25, 2011, Mt. Washington, New Hampshire.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document