Survivals of the Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potentials Response in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Object Intraoperative monitoring of the spinal cord has become the standard of care during surgery for pediatric spinal deformity correction. The use of both somatosensory and motor evoked potentials has dramatically increased the sensitivity and specificity of detecting intraoperative neurophysiological changes to the spinal cord, which assists in the intraoperative decision-making process. The authors report on a large, single-center experience with neuromonitoring changes and outline the surgical management of patients who experience significant neuromonitoring changes during spinal deformity correction surgery. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of all cases involving pediatric patients who underwent spinal deformity correction surgery at Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, between January 2007 and March 2010. Five hundred nineteen consecutive cases were reviewed in which neuromonitoring was used, with 47 cases being identified as having significant changes in somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, or both. These cases were reviewed for patient demographic data and surgical characteristics. Results The incidence of significant neuromonitoring changes was 9.1% (47 of 519 cases), including 6 cases of abnormal Stagnara wake-up tests, of which 4 had corroborated postoperative neurological deficits (8.5% of 47 cases, 0.8% of 519). In response to neuromonitoring changes, wake-up tests were performed in 37 (79%) of 47 cases, hardware was adjusted in 15 (32%), anesthesiology interventions were reported in 5 (11%), hardware was removed in 5 (11%), the patient was successfully repositioned in 3 (6%), and the procedure was aborted in 13 (28%). In 1 of the 4 patients with new postoperative deficits, the deficit had fully resolved by the last follow-up; the other 3 patients had persistent neurological impairment as of the most recent follow-up examination. The authors observed a sensitivity of 100% for intraoperative neuromonitoring. Conclusions Due to the profound risks associated with spinal deformity surgery, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is an integral tool to warn of impending spinal cord injury. Intraoperative neuromonitoring appears to provide a safe and useful warning mechanism to minimize spinal cord injury that may arise during scoliosis correction surgery in pediatric patients.

Download Full-text

Neuromonitoring During Surgery for Paediatric Spinal Deformity in Canada (2007)

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ◽

10.1017/s0317167100006302 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 36 (1) ◽

pp. 47-50 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Jonathan Norton ◽

Douglas Hedden

Keyword(s):

Spinal Deformity ◽

Motor Evoked Potentials ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Deformity Correction ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

National Standards ◽

Spinal Deformity Surgery ◽

Correction Surgery ◽

Training Programmes ◽

Spinal Cord Function

Background:Neuromonitoring during paediatric (and adult) spinal deformity surgery helps to reduce the risk of both permanent and short term neurological damage. A shortage of neurophysiologists and technicians limits the availability of this service. Not all surgeons believe neuromonitoring offers neuroprotection during spinal surgery. This study aimed to document the degree to which paediatric patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery have their spinal cord function monitored.Methods:A questionnaire was sent electronically to all of the surgical members of the Canadian Paediatric Spinal Deformity Study Group.Results:Results were received from 9/9 centres indicating that monitoring was performed in 7/9 centres, with one further centre awaiting staffing. Whilst half of those centres that do monitor only monitor sensory and motor evoked potentials, the remaining centres also use EMG and EEG to assess the state of the patient intraoperatively.Conclusions:Despite a shortage of staff, most paediatric spinal deformity surgeons in Canada who wish to, are able to neurophysiologically monitor their surgical cases. Neuromonitoring appears to be becoming a standard of care, at least for paediatric spinal deformity surgery. There is an urgent need for the establishment of national standards for both technologists and interpreters, as well as training programmes for both these groups.

Download Full-text

The Efficacy of Motor Evoked Potentials in Fixed Sagittal Imbalance Deformity Correction Surgery

Spine ◽

10.1097/brs.0b013e318175c292 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 33 (13) ◽

pp. E414-E424 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Jeremy A. Lieberman ◽

Russ Lyon ◽

John Feiner ◽

Serena S. Hu ◽

Sigurd H. Berven

Keyword(s):

Evoked Potentials ◽

Motor Evoked Potentials ◽

Deformity Correction ◽

Sagittal Imbalance ◽

Fixed Sagittal Imbalance ◽

Correction Surgery

Download Full-text

Comparison of Radiographic And Clinical Outcomes Observed After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Using Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw

10.21203/rs.3.rs-492643/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Qiang Luo ◽

Yong-Chan Kim ◽

Ki-Tack Kim ◽

Kee-Yong Ha ◽

Joonghyun Ahn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spinal Deformity ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Deformity Correction ◽

Postoperative Change ◽

Iliac Screw ◽

Vas Scores ◽

Correction Surgery

Abstract Background: To date, there is a paucity of reports clarifying the change of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent long segment spinal fusion using iliac screw (IS) and S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixation.Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients underwent deformity correction surgery for ASD between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether IS or S2AI fixation was performed. All radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and the last follow-up. Demographics, intraoperative and clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the cohort was subdivided according to the postoperative change in pelvic incidence (PI): subgroup (C) was defined as change in PI ≥5° and subgroup (NC) with change <5°. In subgroup analyses, the 2 different types of postoperative change of PI were directly compared.Results: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria: 111 who received IS and 31 received S2AI fixation. The IS group (65.6 ± 26, 39.8 ± 13.8) showed a significantly higher change in lumbar lordosis (LL) and upper lumbar lordosis (ULL) than the S2AI group (54.4 ± 17.9, 30.3 ± 9.9) (p<0.05). In subgroup (C), PI significantly increased from 53° preoperatively to 59° postoperatively at least 50% of IS cohort, with a mean change of 5.8° (p<0.05). The clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly better in IS group than in S2AI group in terms of VAS scores for back and leg. The occurrence of sacroiliac joint pain and pelvic screw fracture were significantly greater in S2AI group than in IS group (25.8% vs 9%, p<0.05) and (16.1% vs 3.6%, p<0.05).Conclusions: IS fixation showed a greater change in LL and ULL than S2AI fixation in ASD surgery. PI may be changed under certain circumstances.

Download Full-text