Predictors and Long-term Outcome of Sexual Function After Surgical Treatment for Single-level Lumbar Disk Herniation Among Patients in a German Spine Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 356-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa E. Elsharkawy ◽  
Bettina Lange ◽  
Fernando Caldas ◽  
Abdel H. Alabbasi ◽  
Peter D. Klassen
Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1568-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Casal-Moro ◽  
Manuel Castro-Menéndez ◽  
Moisés Hernández-Blanco ◽  
Jose A. Bravo-Ricoy ◽  
Francisco J. Jorge-Barreiro

Abstract BACKGROUND: Several authors have reported results obtained with the microendoscopic diskectomy (MED) technique, but the long-term outcome has not been described. This report summarizes our clinical experience with the lumbar MED technique with a long-term follow-up period. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the MED for lumbar disk herniation and to report long-term outcome and complications (5-year follow-up). METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients with lumbar disk herniation were treated with the METRx system.We included all types of lumbar herniated disks: contained, not contained, foraminal, and migrated disk herniations. The results were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry Disability Index score, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and modified Macnab criteria. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 41 years; 65 were men and 55 were women. The most commonly affected level was L5-S1 (54.2%). The follow-up time after surgery was 5 years in all cases. We obtained good or excellent results in 75% of patients and regular results in 18%. Good subjective satisfaction was observed with surgery in 92% of patients. The mean decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score was 52.8 ± 21.6; the mean decrease in leg VAS score was 6.1 ± 2.3; and the mean decrease in lumbar VAS score was 1.9 ± 3.3. Adjusted mean differences were statistically significant in all cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION: MED not only reduces the incision, tissue damage, and postoperative period of incapacity but also offers long-term results comparable to those of conventional techniques.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Md. Kamrul Ahsan ◽  
Md. Masud Rana ◽  
Zahidul Haq Khan ◽  
Naznin Zaman ◽  
Md. Hamidul Haque ◽  
...  

<p class="Abstract">Aggressive open lumbar discectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for patients with persistent low back and leg pain. In this retrospective study,  1,380 patients were evaluated for long-term results of aggressive discectomy for the single level lumbar disk herniation. Demographic data, surgical data, complications and reherniation rate were collected and clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Mcnab criteria. The mean follow-up period was 28.8 months. According to the modified Mcnab criteria, the long-term results were excellent in 640 cases, good in 445 cases, fair in 255 cases, and poor in 40 cases. The mean VAS scores for back and radicular pains and ODI at the end of 2 years were 1.1 ± 1.0, 1.5 ± 0.5 and 6.6 ± 3.1% respectively. The complications were foot drop (n=7), dural tear (n=14), superficial wound infection (n=17), discitis (n=37) and reherniation (n=64). The dural tear and superficial wound infections resolved after treatment but 28 discitis patients were treated by conservatively and the remaining 9 underwent surgery. Among reherniation patients, 58 underwent revision discectomy and 4 underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and stabilization. Aggressive discectomy is an effective treatment of lumbar disk herniation and maintains a lower incidence of reherniation but leads to a collapse of disc height and in long run gives rise to intervertebral instability and accelerates spondylosis.</p>


Author(s):  
Lorenzo Giammattei ◽  
Mahmoud Messerer ◽  
Roy T. Daniel ◽  
Nozar Aghakhani ◽  
Fabrice Parker

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keerthivasan Panneerselvam ◽  
Rishi Mugesh Kanna ◽  
Ajoy Prasad Shetty ◽  
Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Orthopedics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. e457-e469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remi M. Ajiboye ◽  
Austin Drysch ◽  
Gina M. Mosich ◽  
Akshay Sharma ◽  
Sina Pourtaheri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document