scholarly journals Complication and Failures of Central Vascular Access Device in Adult Critical Care Settings*

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 1998-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Takashima ◽  
Jessica Schults ◽  
Gabor Mihala ◽  
Amanda Corley ◽  
Amanda Ullman
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S4
Author(s):  
Mari Takashima ◽  
Jessica Schults ◽  
Gabor Mihala ◽  
Amanda Corley ◽  
Amanda Ullman

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. e1-e21
Author(s):  
Barb Nickel

Background The goals of infusion therapy are to preserve vascular health and safely deliver needed treatment. Achieving these goals is challenging in critical care because of the complexity of the treatment required. Daily justification of retaining an existing central venous catheter also creates urgency to change to a peripheral vascular access device. The midline catheter has had a resurgence in use because of the need for a long-term peripheral vascular access device not linked to central catheter–associated bloodstream infection risk. Objective To review the characteristics of midline catheters, the benefits and risks of midline catheters, and current evidence regarding midline catheter use in critical care. Results Research related to midline catheters has greatly expanded the body of knowledge regarding vascular access device selection and midline catheter use. Discussion Although the quality and results of research on vascular access devices vary widely, a more accurate safety profile is emerging to illustrate how midline catheter use can support the goals of infusion therapy. Conclusions Optimizing vascular access device selection requires recognition that every vascular access device can cause patient harm. Although the midline catheter appears to fill an important niche in infusion therapy, use of the midline catheter should be carefully evaluated. Midline catheters should not be used as a catheter-associated bloodstream infection prevention strategy, should be inserted to administer peripherally compatible solutions, and should be considered for short-term continuous vesicant therapy only in emergent situations until more definitive vascular access can be achieved.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. S28-S33
Author(s):  
Andrew Barton

The use of sutureless, adhesive securement devices in vascular access has become recommended as best practice, because they are a cost-effective, reliable solution. After a vascular access device has been inserted, catheter securement is one of the most important aspects of care and maintenance. The Grip-Lok® range offers secure, comfortable adhesive securement for all types of vascular access devices. The products use hypoallergenic medical adhesive, which reduces the risk of skin irritation and provides a reliable, adaptable alternative to suturing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. S4-S12
Author(s):  
Rose McGuire ◽  
Ellen Norman ◽  
Iain Hayden

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Cawcutt ◽  
Richard J. Hankins ◽  
Teresa A. Micheels ◽  
Mark E. Rupp

AbstractThis narrative review addresses vascular access device choice from peripheral intravenous catheters through central venous catheters, including the evolving use of midline catheters. The review incorporates best practices, published algorithms, and complications extending beyond CLABSI and phlebitis to assist clinicians in navigating complex vascular access decisions.


Transfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 3461-3467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Gray ◽  
Isabella G. Steidley ◽  
Hollie L. Benson ◽  
Christine L. Pearce ◽  
Amy M. Bachman ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-285
Author(s):  
S.W. Choi ◽  
K.W. Nam ◽  
J.C. Lee ◽  
K.H. Yoon ◽  
J.C. Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document