scholarly journals Does exercise stress testing carry an incremental prognostic value beyond resting office blood pressure?

2022 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-26
Author(s):  
Justina Motiejunaite ◽  
Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot
2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-223
Author(s):  
Alaa Alashi ◽  
Haris Riaz ◽  
Richard Lang ◽  
Raul Seballos ◽  
Steven Feinleib ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Fitzgerald ◽  
Emma L. Ballard ◽  
Gregory M. Scalia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aswini Kumar ◽  
Brinda Muthuswamy ◽  
W Lane Duvall ◽  
Paul D Thompson

Exercise stress testing is an exceptionally useful cardiovascular test providing a wealth of information that can be used in patient management. It can be used in the diagnosis and/or management of chest pain, hypertension, arrhythmia, and heart failure.  Non-imaging exercise stress testing not only helps evaluate the etiology of clinical symptoms but also provides an opportunity to evaluate ECG changes with exercise, total exercise capacity, heart rate response or chronotropic index, blood pressure response, heart rate recovery, and to make estimates of the risk of coronary artery disease using tools such as the Duke Treadmill Score.  These parameters, individually and collectively, provide valuable information on the likelihood of disease and an individual’s prognosis. In addition, exercise testing is inexpensive, quick and widely available compared to imaging studies.  This review contains 6 figures, 5 tables, and 68 references.  Keywords: blood pressure response, chronotropic incompetence, coronary artery disease, Duke Treadmill Score, exercise physiology metabolic equivalents (METs), exercise stress test, exercise treadmill test, exercise-induced hypertension, heart rate recovery, maximal exercise capacity, ST-segment deviation


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1071-1075
Author(s):  
David E. Fixler ◽  
W. Pennock Laird ◽  
Kent Dana

The purpose of this study was to determine whether values of blood pressure during exercise help predict which adolescents are prone to maintain high blood pressure. Dynamic and isometric exercise stress tests were performed on 131 adolescents who had had systolic or diastolic pressures greater than the 95th percentile on three examinations the previous year. Follow-up blood pressures were measured 1 year after the stress testing, and outcomes were classified on the basis of the blood pressure status that year. Stepwise regression analysis was used to examine the association between earlier blood pressures and exercise pressures with outcome pressures. In both male and female adolescents, the average resting systolic pressure on the earlier survey was the best predictor of systolic pressure 2 years later. Blood pressures and heart rates during dynamic and isometric exercise did not significantly contribute to the models' prediction of future systolic or diastolic pressures. The data suggest that exercise stress testing is not a valid method for predicting youths whose blood pressures will remain elevated over the next 1 to 2 years.


2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (11) ◽  
pp. 1609-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish Prakash Gupta ◽  
Sotir Polena ◽  
Neil Coplan ◽  
Georgia Panagopoulos ◽  
Charu Dhingra ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1213-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Katsikis ◽  
Athanasios Theodorakos ◽  
Spyridon Papaioannou ◽  
Virginia Tsapaki ◽  
Genovefa Kolovou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Harb ◽  
T.W Wang ◽  
Y.W Wu ◽  
M.V Menon ◽  
L.C Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Exercise capacity, as measured by metabolic equivalents of task [METs], varies with gender and is an independent predictor of mortality. We sought to investigate gender differences in the protocol selected, the estimated exercise capacity, and the prognostic value of METs. Purpose Investigate the gender differences in the protocol chosen (adjusting for age and comorbidities), the METs achieved (also adjusting for the protocol selected), and the predictive value of exercise capacity adjusted to METs achieved. Methods In a 25-year stress testing registry spanning from 1991 to 2015, we identified 120,705 patients who underwent exercise stress testing. Protocols were split into Bruce vs. non-Bruce. METs were estimated based on established gender-specific formulas (the St James Take Heart Project formula for women, and the Veterans Affairs cohort formula for men).The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results The mean age was 53.3±12.5 years, and 59% were male. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics and exercise parameters. A total of 8426 death occurred over 8.7 years of mean follow-up duration. Females were more commonly referred for non-Bruce protocols [adjusted OR 2.6; 95% CI (2.5–2.7)] even after adjusting for age and comorbidities. Within the same protocol chosen, females achieved lower estimated METs [Beta −1.4; 95% CI (−1.43 to −1.37)]. Exercise capacity was inversely related to mortality in both genders and across protocols (figure 1), however, after adjusting for age, comorbidities, protocol chosen, and the number of METs achieved, the HR for death was significantly lower for women [adjusted HR=0.44; 95% CI (0.41–0.46)]. Conclusion After adjusting for age and comorbidities, women tend to be more commonly referred for non-Bruce protocols, achieve less estimated METs (after adjusting for the protocol chosen), and have half the mortality for the same METs achieved. Death vs. Exercise capacity by gender Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document