scholarly journals A Methodology for Calculation of Internal Dose Following Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from the Detonation of a Nuclear Fission Device

2022 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn R. Anspaugh ◽  
André Bouville ◽  
Kathleen M. Thiessen ◽  
F. Owen Hoffman ◽  
Harold L. Beck ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dunstana R. Melo ◽  
Luiz Bertelli ◽  
Shawki A. Ibrahim ◽  
Lynn R. Anspaugh ◽  
André Bouville ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 131 (7) ◽  
pp. 329 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.V. Danilyan

Engevista ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1496
Author(s):  
Relly Victoria Virgil Petrescu ◽  
Raffaella Aversa ◽  
Antonio Apicella ◽  
Florian Ion Petrescu

Despite research carried out around the world since the 1950s, no industrial application of fusion to energy production has yet succeeded, apart from nuclear weapons with the H-bomb, since this application does not aims at containing and controlling the reaction produced. There are, however, some other less mediated uses, such as neutron generators. The fusion of light nuclei releases enormous amounts of energy from the attraction between the nucleons due to the strong interaction (nuclear binding energy). Fusion it is with nuclear fission one of the two main types of nuclear reactions applied. The mass of the new atom obtained by the fusion is less than the sum of the masses of the two light atoms. In the process of fusion, part of the mass is transformed into energy in its simplest form: heat. This loss is explained by the Einstein known formula E=mc2. Unlike nuclear fission, the fusion products themselves (mainly helium 4) are not radioactive, but when the reaction is used to emit fast neutrons, they can transform the nuclei that capture them into isotopes that some of them can be radioactive. In order to be able to start and to be maintained with the success the nuclear fusion reactions, it is first necessary to know all this reactions very well. This means that it is necessary to know both the main reactions that may take place in a nuclear reactor and their sense and effects. The main aim is to choose and coupling the most convenient reactions, forcing by technical means for their production in the reactor. Taking into account that there are a multitude of possible variants, it is necessary to consider in advance the solutions that we consider them optimal. The paper takes into account both variants of nuclear fusion, and cold and hot. For each variant will be mentioned the minimum necessary specifications.


1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 666 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Roger H. Stuewer

Nuclear physics emerged as the dominant field in experimental and theoretical physics between 1919 and 1939, the two decades between the First and Second World Wars. Milestones were Ernest Rutherford’s discovery of artificial nuclear disintegration (1919), George Gamow’s and Ronald Gurney and Edward Condon’s simultaneous quantum-mechanical theory of alpha decay (1928), Harold Urey’s discovery of deuterium (the deuteron), James Chadwick’s discovery of the neutron, Carl Anderson’s discovery of the positron, John Cockcroft and Ernest Walton’s invention of their eponymous linear accelerator, and Ernest Lawrence’s invention of the cyclotron (1931–2), Frédéric and Irène Joliot-Curie’s discovery and confirmation of artificial radioactivity (1934), Enrico Fermi’s theory of beta decay based on Wolfgang Pauli’s neutrino hypothesis and Fermi’s discovery of the efficacy of slow neutrons in nuclear reactions (1934), Niels Bohr’s theory of the compound nucleus and Gregory Breit and Eugene Wigner’s theory of nucleus+neutron resonances (1936), and Lise Meitner and Otto Robert Frisch’s interpretation of nuclear fission, based on Gamow’s liquid-drop model of the nucleus (1938), which Frisch confirmed experimentally (1939). These achievements reflected the idiosyncratic personalities of the physicists who made them; they were shaped by the physical and intellectual environments of the countries and institutions in which they worked; and they were buffeted by the profound social and political upheavals after the Great War: the punitive postwar treaties, the runaway inflation in Germany and Austria, the Great Depression, and the greatest intellectual migration in history, which encompassed some of the most gifted experimental and theoretical nuclear physicists in the world.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 101182
Author(s):  
Kieran O'Gorman ◽  
Dominique Tanner ◽  
Mariana Sontag-González ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Frank Brink ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Verriere ◽  
Matthew Ryan Mumpower

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rääf ◽  
V. Barkauskas ◽  
K. Eriksson Stenström ◽  
C. Bernhardsson ◽  
H. B. L. Pettersson

AbstractThe pure alpha emitter 148Gd may have a significant radiological impact in terms of internal dose to exposed humans in case of accidental releases from a spallation source using a tungsten target, such as the one to be used in the European Spallation Source (ESS). In this work we aim to present an approach to indirectly estimate the whole-body burden of 148Gd and the associated committed effective dose in exposed humans, by means of high-resolution gamma spectrometry of the gamma-emitting radiogadolinium isotopes 146Gd and 153Gd that are accompanied by 148Gd generated from the operation of the tungsten target. Theoretical minimum detectable whole-body activity (MDA) and associated internal doses from 148Gd are calculated using a combination of existing biokinetic models and recent computer simulation studies on the generated isotope ratios of 146Gd/148Gd and 153Gd/148Gd in the ESS target. Of the two gamma-emitting gadolinium isotopes, 146Gd is initially the most sensitive indicator of the presence of 148Gd if whole-body counting is performed within a month after the release, using the twin photo peaks of 146Gd centered at 115.4 keV (MDA < 1 Bq for ingested 148Gd, and < 25 Bq for inhaled 148Gd). The corresponding minimum detectable committed effective doses will be less than 1 µSv for ingested 148Gd, but substantially higher for inhaled 148Gd (up to 0.3 mSv), depending on operation time of the target prior to the release. However, a few months after an atmospheric release, 153Gd becomes a much more sensitive indicator of body burdens of 148Gd, with a minimum detectable committed effective doses ranging from 18 to 77 µSv for chronic ingestion and between 0.65 to 2.7 mSv for acute inhalation in connection to the release. The main issue with this indirect method for 148Gd internal dose estimation, is whether the primary photon peaks from 146 and 153Gd can be detected undisturbed. Preliminary simulations show that nuclides such as 182Ta may potentially create perturbations that could impair this evaluation method, and which impact needs to be further studied in future safety assessments of accidental target releases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document