Transcaruncular double injection technique for peribulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery

Retina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Savastano Alfonso ◽  
Crincoli Emanuele ◽  
Gambini Gloria ◽  
Savastano Maria Cristina ◽  
Rizzo Clara ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Suresh Kumar Vallapureddy ◽  
Gajanan Fultambkar ◽  
V. Rajeswar Rao ◽  
Vinay Kukreja ◽  
Rammohan Gurram ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (<i>p</i> = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.


2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1571-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier March ◽  
Olga Pineda ◽  
Maria M. Garcia ◽  
Dolores Caram??s ◽  
Antonio Villalonga

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Gioia ◽  
Edi Prandi ◽  
Marco Codenotti ◽  
Andrea Casati ◽  
Guido Fanelli ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Risch ◽  
Stephan Blumenthal ◽  
Alain Borgeat

2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ONSE140-ONSE141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom L. Yao ◽  
Eric Eskioglu ◽  
Michael Ayad ◽  
Arthur J. Ulm ◽  
Robert A. Mericle

Abstract Objective: Interpretation of angioarchitecture during embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is critical to optimizing results. We describe an adjunctive technique to aid in the interpretation of AVM embolization and improve safety. Methods: In the past 100 consecutive patients who underwent AVM embolization by a single surgeon (RAM), each AVM nidus was selectively catheterized and microangiography was performed. After the microcatheter contrast exited the AVM, guiding catheter angiography was performed during the same digital run. The microangiogram was digitally superimposed on the guiding catheter angiogram to delineate important landmarks such as the nidus perimeter, draining veins, and microcatheter tip, which were then drawn on the digital subtraction angiographic monitor with a marking pen in two orthogonal views. Results: Important landmarks were continually visualized during the embolization procedure despite subtracted fluoroscopy (“blank” roadmap). These techniques qualitatively helped to: 1) appreciate the overall size and morphology of the nidus, 2) clearly visualize the safe limits of the embolic injection within the nidus perimeter, 3) clearly visualize draining patterns to help avoid premature venous embolization, 4) decipher small draining veins from arteries, 5) continuously monitor the location and status of the microcatheter tip, and 6) increase the confidence of the surgeon during prolonged embolic injections. Conclusion: The double injection technique, with marking pen demarcation of the nidus perimeter, venous drainage, and microcatheter tip position, was qualitatively useful in every case.


1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Gioia ◽  
Edi Prandi ◽  
Marco Codenotti ◽  
Andrea Casati ◽  
Guido Fanelli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quehua Luo ◽  
Weifeng Yao ◽  
Yunfei Chai ◽  
Lu Chang ◽  
Hui Yao ◽  
...  

Abstract Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CC-approach) is a recently described brachial plexus block (BPB) and an alternative approach to the supraclavicular approach (SC-approach). The relevant sonoanatomy is analogous in terms of the brachial plexus and its adjacent artery for both approaches. In the present study, we hypothesized that the two approaches will result in similar block dynamics when used the modified double-injection (MDI) technique. One hundred and twelve patients were randomly allocated to receive either a SC- or CC-approach with MDI technique. In the CC group, half the volume was injected adjacent to the medial cord of the brachial plexus, the procedure was guided by ultrasound and verified by nerve stimulator, subsequently the second half was injected close to the lateral cord. In the SC group, the MDI technique was carried out as described in our previous study. Sensory and motor blockade of all four terminal nerves were assessed with a 3-point scale. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete sensory blockade at 15 min with a predefined non-inferiority margin of −13%. The proportion of subjects at 15 min was comparable between the SC group and the CC group (91 vs 87%, absolute difference: −3%). No significant differences were found for complete motor blockade and onset times of the individual nerves within 30 min, and block-related serious adverse events (all P&gt;0.05). We conclude that the MDI technique applied to a costoclavicular and supraclavicular block resulted in similar block dynamics. In addition, it may provide a promising alternative technique when considering the use of multipoint injection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document