Is the Double-Injection Technique Really Needed?

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Risch ◽  
Stephan Blumenthal ◽  
Alain Borgeat
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Suresh Kumar Vallapureddy ◽  
Gajanan Fultambkar ◽  
V. Rajeswar Rao ◽  
Vinay Kukreja ◽  
Rammohan Gurram ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (<i>p</i> = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.


2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1571-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier March ◽  
Olga Pineda ◽  
Maria M. Garcia ◽  
Dolores Caram??s ◽  
Antonio Villalonga

Retina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Savastano Alfonso ◽  
Crincoli Emanuele ◽  
Gambini Gloria ◽  
Savastano Maria Cristina ◽  
Rizzo Clara ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ONSE140-ONSE141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom L. Yao ◽  
Eric Eskioglu ◽  
Michael Ayad ◽  
Arthur J. Ulm ◽  
Robert A. Mericle

Abstract Objective: Interpretation of angioarchitecture during embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is critical to optimizing results. We describe an adjunctive technique to aid in the interpretation of AVM embolization and improve safety. Methods: In the past 100 consecutive patients who underwent AVM embolization by a single surgeon (RAM), each AVM nidus was selectively catheterized and microangiography was performed. After the microcatheter contrast exited the AVM, guiding catheter angiography was performed during the same digital run. The microangiogram was digitally superimposed on the guiding catheter angiogram to delineate important landmarks such as the nidus perimeter, draining veins, and microcatheter tip, which were then drawn on the digital subtraction angiographic monitor with a marking pen in two orthogonal views. Results: Important landmarks were continually visualized during the embolization procedure despite subtracted fluoroscopy (“blank” roadmap). These techniques qualitatively helped to: 1) appreciate the overall size and morphology of the nidus, 2) clearly visualize the safe limits of the embolic injection within the nidus perimeter, 3) clearly visualize draining patterns to help avoid premature venous embolization, 4) decipher small draining veins from arteries, 5) continuously monitor the location and status of the microcatheter tip, and 6) increase the confidence of the surgeon during prolonged embolic injections. Conclusion: The double injection technique, with marking pen demarcation of the nidus perimeter, venous drainage, and microcatheter tip position, was qualitatively useful in every case.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quehua Luo ◽  
Weifeng Yao ◽  
Yunfei Chai ◽  
Lu Chang ◽  
Hui Yao ◽  
...  

Abstract Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CC-approach) is a recently described brachial plexus block (BPB) and an alternative approach to the supraclavicular approach (SC-approach). The relevant sonoanatomy is analogous in terms of the brachial plexus and its adjacent artery for both approaches. In the present study, we hypothesized that the two approaches will result in similar block dynamics when used the modified double-injection (MDI) technique. One hundred and twelve patients were randomly allocated to receive either a SC- or CC-approach with MDI technique. In the CC group, half the volume was injected adjacent to the medial cord of the brachial plexus, the procedure was guided by ultrasound and verified by nerve stimulator, subsequently the second half was injected close to the lateral cord. In the SC group, the MDI technique was carried out as described in our previous study. Sensory and motor blockade of all four terminal nerves were assessed with a 3-point scale. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete sensory blockade at 15 min with a predefined non-inferiority margin of −13%. The proportion of subjects at 15 min was comparable between the SC group and the CC group (91 vs 87%, absolute difference: −3%). No significant differences were found for complete motor blockade and onset times of the individual nerves within 30 min, and block-related serious adverse events (all P&gt;0.05). We conclude that the MDI technique applied to a costoclavicular and supraclavicular block resulted in similar block dynamics. In addition, it may provide a promising alternative technique when considering the use of multipoint injection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Shilpi Kapoor ◽  
Shagufta Rather ◽  
Dinesh Gupta

Background: Peribulbar anaesthesia has almost totally replaced general anaesthesia and retrobulbar block for ocular procedures especially in adults. Peribulbar block involves injections above and below the orbit, with local anesthetic deposited within the orbit but does not enter the muscle cone. Relatively safe but it is still associated with complications which are detailed in this study. Aims and Objective: To study the complications of classic double injection technique of peribulbar anaesthesia given in supine position before cataract surgery and to find the percentage of patients achieving complete block with 7ml of anaesthetic solution given by peribulbar route. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 500 patients who were admitted for undergoing cataract extraction surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology in GMC Jammu for a period of 8 months from December 2018 to July 2019. Results: It was observed that 103 patients out of 500 (20.6%) developed one or more of complications. Chemosis was the most common complication which occurred in 87 (17.4%) patients followed by subcunjunctival haemorrhage observed in 19 (3.8%) patients. Lid ecchymosis occurred in 16 (2.4%) patients. Retrobulbar haemorrhage occurred in 11 (2.2%) patients. 2 (0.4%) patients developed severe lid edema. In 2 (0.4%) patients wrong eye was given block. 1 (0.2%) patient developed CRAO. Complete akinesia was obtained in 415 (83%) patients with 7ml of block. Rest required supplementary injections. 14 (2.8%) patients did not attain full akinesia after 12ml of block. Conclusion: Peribulbar block is a relatively safe procedure for obtaining ocular analgesia and akinesia, but is still associated with complications ranging from minor lid edema and chemosis to grave events like RBH to CRAO.


2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Taboada ◽  
Jaime Rodríguez ◽  
Julián Álvarez ◽  
Joaquín Cortés ◽  
Francisco Gude ◽  
...  

Background For peripheral nerve blockade, the double-injection technique proved to be superior to a single injection in previous investigations. The current study was designed to compare onset time and efficacy of two different double-injection approaches for sciatic nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine. Methods A total of 50 patients undergoing foot surgery were randomly assigned to receive sciatic nerve blockade by means of the classic (Labat) posterior approach (n = 25) or a lateral popliteal approach (n = 25). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator, and both major components of the sciatic nerve (tibial and common peroneal nerves) received separately 10 ml ropivacaine, 0.75%. Success rate was defined as a complete sensory and motor block associated with pain-free surgery. Results A greater success rate was observed in the classic group (96%) as compared with the popliteal group (68%; P &lt; 0.05). A general anesthetic became necessary in six patients (24%) with the lateral popliteal approach and none with the classic approach (P &lt; 0.05). The onset of complete sensory and motor blockade was significantly faster in the classic group (12 +/- 6 min) as compared with the popliteal group (26 +/- 10 min; P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion A double injection with a relatively low volume of 0.75% ropivacaine generated a higher success rate and a shorter onset time of sensory and motor blockade after the classic Labat approach than after a lateral popliteal approach.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie Roy ◽  
Marie-Josée Nadeau ◽  
Dany Côté ◽  
Simon Levesque ◽  
Nicolas Dion ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document