scholarly journals Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Suresh Kumar Vallapureddy ◽  
Gajanan Fultambkar ◽  
V. Rajeswar Rao ◽  
Vinay Kukreja ◽  
Rammohan Gurram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Double Injection ◽  
Performance Time ◽  
Plexus Block

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (<i>p</i> = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.

scholarly journals Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block using a modified double-injection technique: a randomized non-inferiority trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quehua Luo ◽  
Weifeng Yao ◽  
Yunfei Chai ◽  
Lu Chang ◽  
Hui Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Double Injection ◽  
Plexus Block

Abstract Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CC-approach) is a recently described brachial plexus block (BPB) and an alternative approach to the supraclavicular approach (SC-approach). The relevant sonoanatomy is analogous in terms of the brachial plexus and its adjacent artery for both approaches. In the present study, we hypothesized that the two approaches will result in similar block dynamics when used the modified double-injection (MDI) technique. One hundred and twelve patients were randomly allocated to receive either a SC- or CC-approach with MDI technique. In the CC group, half the volume was injected adjacent to the medial cord of the brachial plexus, the procedure was guided by ultrasound and verified by nerve stimulator, subsequently the second half was injected close to the lateral cord. In the SC group, the MDI technique was carried out as described in our previous study. Sensory and motor blockade of all four terminal nerves were assessed with a 3-point scale. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete sensory blockade at 15 min with a predefined non-inferiority margin of −13%. The proportion of subjects at 15 min was comparable between the SC group and the CC group (91 vs 87%, absolute difference: −3%). No significant differences were found for complete motor blockade and onset times of the individual nerves within 30 min, and block-related serious adverse events (all P&gt;0.05). We conclude that the MDI technique applied to a costoclavicular and supraclavicular block resulted in similar block dynamics. In addition, it may provide a promising alternative technique when considering the use of multipoint injection.

scholarly journals An Estimation of the Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume of 2% Lidocaine in Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. O’Donnell ◽  
Gabrielle Iohom
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Performance Time ◽  
Axillary Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Block Success ◽  
Plexus Block

Background Ultrasound guidance facilitates precise needle and injectate placement, increasing axillary block success rates, reducing onset times, and permitting local anesthetic dose reduction. The minimum effective volume of local anesthetic in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block is unknown. The authors performed a study to estimate the minimum effective anesthetic volume of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (2% LidoEpi) in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Methods After ethical approval and informed consent, patients undergoing hand surgery of less than 90 min duration were recruited. A step-up/step-down study model was used with nonprobability sequential dosing based on the outcome of the previous patient. The starting dose of 2% LidoEpi was 4 ml per nerve. Block failure resulted in a dose increase of 0.5 ml; block success in a reduction of 0.5 ml.A blinded assistant assessed sensory and motor blockade at 5-min intervals up to 30 min. Block performance time and duration were measured. Two predetermined stopping points were used; a minimum of five consecutive block success/failures and five consecutive successful blocks at 1 ml per nerve. Results The study was terminated when five consecutive patients had successful blocks using 1 ml of 2% LidoEpi per nerve (overall group n = 11). All five patients had surgical anesthesia within 10 min. The mean (SD) block performance time was 445 (100) s, and block duration was 190 min (range 120-310 min). All surgical procedures were performed under regional anesthesia with anxiolytic sedation provided in 3 of 11 cases. Conclusion Successful ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block may be performed with 1 ml per nerve of 2% LidoEpi.

TO STUDY AND COMPARE THE EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND FENTANY AS AN ADJUVANT TO LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN INTERSCALENE BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR HUMERUS SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kushal Jethani ◽  
Khushboo . ◽  
Anjali Bansal
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group D

Introduction: Interscalene brachial plexus block provides complete and reliable anaesthesia for surgery of humerus as well as analgesia for postoperative period. Many studies are being done for the search for an adjuvant which when added to a local anaesthetic, prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia. Therefore we compared the effect of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia when added to levobupivacaine for Interscalene brachial plexus block. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, 90 patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups:  Group C (n=30) recieved 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine, Group D (n=30) recieved 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, Group F (n=30) recieved 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine + fentanyl 1 μg/kg. The duration of blockade and analgesia were assessed for all the three groups. Observations: Demographic profile was comparable in all the groups. The onset of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia and motor block were enhanced in Group D and Group F as compared to Group C. The mean pulse rate and mean arterial pressure were slightly lower in dexmedetomidine group than in other two groups. Results: Compared to the use of levobupivacaine alone for interscalene brachial plexus block, addition of 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine or 1 mcg/kg fentanyl to levobupivacaine enhanced the onset of blockade as well as increased the duration of blockade and post-operative analgesia. Also, the blockade characteristics were better improved with addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine than addition of fentanyl to levobupivacaine without increasing incidence of any unwanted side-effects. Keywords: Interscalene brachial plexus block, Levobupivacaine, Fentanyl, Dexmedetomidine.

Comparative study of (0.5%) levobupivacaine and (0.75%) ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by lateral approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2426
Author(s):  
Jitesh Kumar ◽  
. Sweta ◽  
Kumari Kanak Lata ◽  
B. K. Prasad ◽  
V. K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: As compared to general anaesthesia, brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery gives fewer side effects and better postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.5% levobupivacaine and compare it with 0.75% ropivacaine.Methods: For this prospective randomized, controlled study, 60 patients of both sexes of ASA grade 1 and 2 were enrolled and divided into two groups and supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed by lateral approach using 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. The onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block and analgesia and possible adverse events were recorded.Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the onset of sensory block in both groups. Onset of motor block was significantly faster in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05). Duration of sensory block, motor block and analgesia was significantly longer in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05).Conclusions: 0.5% levobupivacaine is better alternative to 0.75% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block in term of early onset of sensory block and long duration of analgesia.

Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián Layera ◽  
Julián Aliste ◽  
Daniela Bravo ◽  
Diego Fernández ◽  
Armando García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Single Injection ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Double Injection ◽  
Performance Time ◽  
Injection Group ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery

BackgroundThe costoclavicular approach targets the brachial plexus in the proximal infraclavicular fossa, where the lateral, medial, and posterior cords are tightly bundled together. This randomized trial compared single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided costoclavicular blocks. We selected onset time as the primary outcome and hypothesized that, compared with its single-injection counterpart, the double-injection technique would result in a swifter onset.MethodsNinety patients undergoing upper limb surgery (at or below the elbow joint) were randomly allocated to receive a single- (n=45) or double-injection (n=45) ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The local anesthetic agent (35 mL of lidocaine 1%-bupivacaine 0.25%with epinephrine 5 µg/mL and 2 mg of preservative-free dexamethasone) was identical in all subjects. In the single-injection group, the entire volume of local anesthetic was injected between the three cords of the brachial plexus. In the double-injection group, the first half of the volume was administered in this location; the second half was deposited between the medial cord and the subclavian artery. After the performance of the block, a blinded observer recorded the onset time (defined as the time required to achieve a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points), success rate (surgical anesthesia) and block-related pain scores. Performance time and the number of needle passes were also recorded during the performance of the block. The total anesthesia-related time was defined as the sum of the performance and onset times.ResultsCompared with its single-injection counterpart, the double-injection technique displayed shorter onset time (16.6 (6.4) vs 23.4 (6.9) min; p<0.001; 95% CI for difference 3.9 to 9.7) and total anesthesia-related time (22.5 (6.7) vs 28.9 (7.6) min; p<0.001). No intergroup differences were found in terms of success and technical execution (ie, performance time/procedural pain). The double-injection group required more needle passes than the single-injection group (2 (1–4) vs 1 (1–3); p<0.001).ConclusionCompared with its single-injection counterpart, double-injection costoclavicular block results in shorter onset and total anesthesia-related times. Further investigation is required to determine if a triple-injection technique (with targeted local anesthetic injection around each cord of the brachial plexus) could further decrease the onset time.Trial registration numberNCT03595514.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document