Stage IIA1 Versus Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Does the New Staging Criteria Predict Survival?

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunjal Garg ◽  
Jay P. Shah ◽  
Eugene P. Toy ◽  
Carl Christensen ◽  
Gunter Deppe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Primary Radiation ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Patient Âgé

Objective:(1) To determine the correlation of 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system with survival in patients with stage IIA cervical cancer, (2) to elucidate the treatment patterns in stage IIA1 and stage IIA2 cervical cancer, and (3) to investigate whether radical hysterectomy or radiation influenced overall survival.Methods:Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Statistical analysis usedχ2test, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and logistic regression.Results:Of the 560 women, 271 (48.4%) had stage IIA1, and 289 (51.6%) had stage IIA2 cervical cancer. Stage IIA2 patients were younger than stage IIA1 patients (mean age, 49 years vs 54 years;P= 0.01). Stage IIA1, compared with stage IIA2, differed significantly regarding the administration of primary radiation (47.2% vs 64.7%,P< 0.001) and adjuvant radiation (60.5% vs 77.5%,P= 0.006). The following variables were significantly associated with the performance of radical hysterectomy: patient age, 65 years or younger, tumor size, ≤2 cm or lesser, high tumor grade, and nonsquamous tumor histology. The incidence of adjuvant radiation after radical hysterectomy was high (48% [tumor size, ≤2 cm] to 86% [tumor size, >6 cm]). The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between stages IIA1 and IIA2 (65.8% vs 59.5%,P= 0.2). Only patient age (P= 0.01), tumor size (P= 0.02), and lymph node status (P= 0.002) were independent predictors of survival. When controlled for other contributing factors, there was no significant difference in survival between patients treated by radical hysterectomy and primary radiation.Conclusions:The 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging criteria is not an independent predictor of survival in stage IIA cervical cancer. Given the equivalent efficacy of radical hysterectomy and radiation, attention should be paid to the high risk of adjuvant radiation in these patients.

Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Carcinoma: The Belgian Experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1690-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
An Segaert ◽  
Koen Traen ◽  
Philippe Van Trappen ◽  
Frederik Peeters ◽  
Karin Leunen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Oncological Outcome ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Stage Ia ◽  
Disease Free

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to report the experience and oncological outcome of robot-assisted radical hysterectomies (RRHs) for cervical cancer performed in Belgium.MethodsPatients undergoing RRH for cervical cancer (n = 109) were prospectively collected between July 2007 and April 2014 in the 5 Belgian centers performing RRH for cervical cancer.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 31–80 years). Histological types included squamous cell carcinoma in 61 patients, adenocarcinoma in 22 patients, adenosquamous in 8 patients, endometrioid carcinoma in 2 patients, and other types (n = 16). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was IA (n = 9), stage IB1 (n = 71), stage IB2 (n = 4), stage II (n = 24), and unknown (n = 1). Twenty-four patients received adjuvant therapy, 17 patients underwent radiochemotherapy, and 7 underwent adjuvant radiation. Eighteen patients relapsed, and 5 died of disease. The median follow-up was 27.5 months (range, 3–82 months). The 2- and 5-year overall survivals were 96% and 89%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survivals (DFSs) were 88% and 72%, respectively. The 2-year DFS per stage was 100% for IA, 88% for IB1, 100% for IB2, and 83% for II. The 5-year DFS per stage was 100% for stage IA and 75% for IB1. The complications were as expected for radical hysterectomy.ConclusionsThis series confirms the feasibility and safety of RRH not only in cervical cancer stage IA to IB1, but also after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 to IIB.

scholarly journals Treatment of cervical cancer in the Republic of Srpska

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 588-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nenad Lucic ◽  
Zora Antonic ◽  
Vesna Ecim ◽  
Dragica Draganovic ◽  
Ljiljana Latinovic
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Banja Luka ◽  
Cervical Tumors

Introduction. Since 1897, when the first radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy was done by Wertheim in Vienna, this operation has had the central role in the surgical treatment of invasive cervical tumors. Material and methods. In the period from 1997 to 2010, 177 patients diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1 - II were operated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Banja Luka. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy by Wertheim - Meigs. The aim of this study is to present the technique of this operation, as well as its effectiveness in the treatment of cervical cancer. Results. The distribution of the patients having invasive cervical cancer according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification was as follows: I B1 - 35.67%, I B2 - 23.17%, II A - 15.48%, II B - 25.68% on average is 21.3 removed lymph glands. The rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications was 8 (4.51%) and 17 (9.60%), respectively. Of the 26 patients who were operated in the period from 2005 - 2010, 13 had stage II B according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; there were 6 lethal outcomes (23.08) and the five-year survival rate was 76.92%. Discussion and conclusion. By applying the proper surgical technique and early prevention of immediate complications, we achieved satisfactory results in operative morbity and mortality, intraoperative and postoperative complications of the lesion for radical surgery by the Wertheim- Meigs-in the treatment of cancer of the uterus in the I B - II B stage according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer of High-Risk Histological Subtypes

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonika Agarwal ◽  
Kathleen M. Schmeler ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Alpa Nick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Background:The most common types of cervical cancer are squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma, referred to here collectively as SA cervical cancer. Other types of cervical cancer, referred to here collectively as nonsquamous/nonadenocarcinoma (NSNA) cervical cancer, include neuroendocrine, small cell, clear cell, sarcomatoid, and serous tumors. Anecdotally, NSNA tumors seem to have a worse prognosis than their SA counterparts. We sought to determine whether patients with early-stage NSNA have a worse prognosis than those with early-stage SA cervical cancer.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed charts of women with stage IA1-IB2 NSNA cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1990 to 2006. The NSNA patients were matched 1:2 to patients with grade 3 SA lesions on the basis of stage, age at diagnosis, tumor size, and date of diagnosis.Results:Eighteen patients with NSNA primary cervical cancer subtypes (neuroendocrine [n = 7], small cell [n = 5], clear cell [n = 4], papillary serous [n = 1], and sarcomatoid [n = 1]) were matched to 36 patients with grade 3 SA lesions. There were no differences between the 2 groups in age, body mass index, clinical stage, or lesion size. The 2 groups also did not differ with respect to number of nodes resected, lymphovascular space invasion, margin status, lymph node metastasis, or adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, median progression-free and overall survivals had not been reached; however, both progression-free survival (P= 0.018) and overall survival (P= 0.028) were worse for the NSNA group. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 61.2% and 67.6%, respectively, for the NSNA group, compared with 90.1% and 88.3%, respectively, for the SA group.Conclusions:Patients with early-stage NSNA cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy have a worse prognosis than patients with grade 3 SA lesions. Patients with NSNA tumors may require a multimodality approach to their cancer care.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1143-1150
Author(s):  
Ting wen yi Hu ◽  
Yue Huang ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Dan Nie ◽  
Zhengyu Li
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionRecently, the safety of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer has been questioned. This study was designed to compare the disease-free survival and overall survival of abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsA total of 1065 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone abdominal/laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2016 in seven hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all patients. Patients with tumor size ≥2 cm and <2 cm were stratified and analyzed separately. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between matched groups. After confirming the normality by the Shapiro-Wilks test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the χ2 test were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.ResultsAfter matching, a total of 812 patients were included in the disease-free survival and overall survival analyses. In the entire cohort, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.73; p=0.048) but not overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.88; p=0.12) when compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy group. In patients with tumor size ≥2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.55; p=0.032) than the abdominal radical hysterectomy group, whereas no significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.83; p=0.10) was found. Additionally, in patients with tumor size <2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy groups had similar disease-free survival (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.16; p=0.59) and overall survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.13; p=0.53).ConclusionLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with inferior disease-free survival compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in the entire cohort, as well as in patients with tumor size ≥2 cm. For the surgical treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer, priority should be given to open abdominal radical hysterectomy.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer Patients: A Matched-Case Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1466-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Hyun Kim ◽  
Chel Hun Choi ◽  
June-Kuk Choi ◽  
Aera Yoon ◽  
Yoo-Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare initial surgical outcomes and complication rates of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH).MethodsPatients diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IIA) who underwent RRH (n = 23) at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to May 2013 were compared with matched patients who underwent LRH (n = 69) during the same period. The 2 surgical groups were matched 3:1 for variables of age, body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histological subtype, tumor size, and node positivity. All patient information and surgical and postoperative follow-up data were retrospectively collected.ResultsOperating time was significantly longer (317 vs 236 minutes; P < 0.001) in the RRH group compared with the LRH group but mean estimated blood loss was significantly reduced in the RRH group (200 vs 350 mL; P = 0.036). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups (4.3% for RRH vs 1.45% for LRH; P = 0.439). Recurrences were 2 (8.7%) in the RRH and 7 (10.1%) in the LRH group. The overall 3-year recurrence-free survival was 91.3% in RRH group and 89.9% in the LRH group (P = 0.778).ConclusionsAlthough operating time was longer in the RRH cases because of lesser experience on robotic platform, we showed that surgical outcomes and complication rate of RRH were comparable to those of LRH. In addition, surgical skills for LRH easily and safely translated to RRH in case of experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

scholarly journals Radical hysterectomy in surgical treatment of invasive cervical cancer at the Department of gynecology and obstetrics in Novi Sad in the period 1993-2013.

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Srdjan Djurdjevic ◽  
Sanja Stojanovic ◽  
Milos Pantelic ◽  
Dragan Nikolic ◽  
Marijana Basta-Nikolic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Paraaortic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Novi Sad

Introduction. During the period from 1993 - 2013, 175 women with invasive cervical cancer underwent radical hysterectomy sec. Wertheim-Meigs at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad. Indications for radical hysterectomy comprise histopathologically confirmed invasive cervical cancer in stages I B 1 - II B according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Material and Methods. Stage of the disease or extent of the disease spread to the adjacent structures was assessed in accordance with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system from 2009. Exclusion criteria were all other stages of this disease: I A and stages higher than II B, as well as the absence of definite histological confirmation of the cervical cancer (primary endometrial or vaginal cancer which infiltrates the uterine cervix). Prior the operation, the following had to be done: the imaging of pelvis and abdomen, chest X-ray in two directions, electrocardiography, internist and anesthesiological examination. Results. The patients? age ranged from 24-79 years (x : 46 years), and the operation duration was 120-300 minutes (x : 210 min.). Stage I B 1 was found in 64.6% of operated patients, 14.8% of the patients were in stage I B 2, 9.1% were in stage II A and 11.4 % were in stage II B. Blood loss during the operation ranged from 50-800 ml (on average 300 ml), and the number of removed lymph nodes per operation was 14-75 (x : 32). Intraoperative and postoperative complications developed in 6.8% of and 17.7% of patients, respectively. Recurrence was reported in 22 (12.5%) patients, most often in paraaortic lymph nodes (3.4%) and parametria (2.8%), while the overall 5-year survival rate was 87% until 2008. Concluision. Wertheim-Meigs radical hysterectomy is a basic surgical technique for the treatment of initial stages of invasive cervical cancer.

Overexpression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Is a Predictor of Poor Prognosis in Cervical Cancer: A Clinicopathologic Study and a Meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1054-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaoling Huang ◽  
Qing Chen ◽  
Jianpeng Xiao ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Lijuan Bian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1Α ◽  
Clinicopathologic Study ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

BackgroundPublished data on the prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression in cervical cancer are conflicting and heterogeneous. We aimed to derive a more precise estimation of them.MethodsWe conducted a clinicopathologic study in 74 patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated through surgery and performed a meta-analysis among patients with cervical cancer of all stages to estimate the prognostic importance of HIF-1α expression for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Expression of HIF-1α was evaluated through immunohistochemistry.ResultsA positive nuclear expression of HIF-1α was found in 94.6% of all specimens. There were significant associations between HIF-1α expression and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P = 0.024), tumor size (P = 0.003), and anemia (P = 0.010), respectively. Log-rank tests revealed significant correlations between HIF-1α expression, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages, tumor grade, tumor size and DFS/OS, respectively. The multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed HIF-1α overexpression and high tumor grade to be independent predictors for impaired DFS (HIF-1α overexpression: hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–6.47; high tumor grade: HR, 5.56; 95% CI, 1.47–21.13) and OS (HIF-1α overexpression: HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.06–6.23; high tumor grade: HR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.49–25.97). The results of 10 studies indicated that HIF-1α overexpression predicted poor DFS (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.22–3.21) and OS (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.86–3.56) for cervical cancer.ConclusionsThe present clinicopathologic study and meta-analysis showed that HIF-1α overexpression is associated with poor survival of cervical cancer and emphasized the importance of HIF-1α as a predictor for cervical cancer.

scholarly journals Patient age, tumor appearance and tumor size are risk factors for early recurrence of cervical cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUAN WANG ◽  
TAO WANG ◽  
YUN-YI YANG ◽  
YAN-LAN CHAI ◽  
FAN SHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Patient Âgé
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document