scholarly journals Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer of High-Risk Histological Subtypes

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonika Agarwal ◽  
Kathleen M. Schmeler ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Alpa Nick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Background:The most common types of cervical cancer are squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma, referred to here collectively as SA cervical cancer. Other types of cervical cancer, referred to here collectively as nonsquamous/nonadenocarcinoma (NSNA) cervical cancer, include neuroendocrine, small cell, clear cell, sarcomatoid, and serous tumors. Anecdotally, NSNA tumors seem to have a worse prognosis than their SA counterparts. We sought to determine whether patients with early-stage NSNA have a worse prognosis than those with early-stage SA cervical cancer.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed charts of women with stage IA1-IB2 NSNA cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1990 to 2006. The NSNA patients were matched 1:2 to patients with grade 3 SA lesions on the basis of stage, age at diagnosis, tumor size, and date of diagnosis.Results:Eighteen patients with NSNA primary cervical cancer subtypes (neuroendocrine [n = 7], small cell [n = 5], clear cell [n = 4], papillary serous [n = 1], and sarcomatoid [n = 1]) were matched to 36 patients with grade 3 SA lesions. There were no differences between the 2 groups in age, body mass index, clinical stage, or lesion size. The 2 groups also did not differ with respect to number of nodes resected, lymphovascular space invasion, margin status, lymph node metastasis, or adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, median progression-free and overall survivals had not been reached; however, both progression-free survival (P= 0.018) and overall survival (P= 0.028) were worse for the NSNA group. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 61.2% and 67.6%, respectively, for the NSNA group, compared with 90.1% and 88.3%, respectively, for the SA group.Conclusions:Patients with early-stage NSNA cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy have a worse prognosis than patients with grade 3 SA lesions. Patients with NSNA tumors may require a multimodality approach to their cancer care.

Completing or Abandoning Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Lymph Node–Positive Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1015-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marloes Derks ◽  
Freek A. Groenman ◽  
Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen ◽  
Paulien C. Schut ◽  
Henrike Westerveld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Lymph Node Positive

Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Yaqing Chen ◽  
Aijun Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Lymph Node Sampling ◽  
Aortic Lymph Node ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Background and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, and recurrence rate of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for bulky early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with stage IB1 or IIA2 cervical cancer in which the tumor diameter was 3 cm or greater. All patients underwent LRH (n = 30) or ARH (n = 82) with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling between May 2011 and November 2014. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 surgical groups.ResultsThe laparoscopic approach consisted of 4 trocar insertions. Age, tumor diameter, and pelvic lymph nodes significantly differed between the 2 cohorts. Body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histologic type and grade, deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive margins, and adjuvant therapy were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy exhibited favorable results compared with ARH in terms of operating time, blood loss, intestinal exhaust time, and length of hospital stay. In addition, recurrence was observed in 5 LRH patients (16.7%) and 9 ARH patients (11.7%).ConclusionsThe surgical outcomes of LRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling exhibited a similar therapeutic efficacy to those of the ARH approach.

Further stratification of risk groups in patients with lymph node metastasis after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Yeol Park ◽  
Dae-Yeon Kim ◽  
Jong-Hyeok Kim ◽  
Yong-Man Kim ◽  
Young-Tak Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Sentinel Lymph Node Identification and Radical Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berta Díaz-Feijoo ◽  
Antonio Gil-Moreno ◽  
María A. Pérez-Benavente ◽  
Sergio Morchón ◽  
José M. Martínez-Palones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Identification ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Laparoscopy

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1143-1150
Author(s):  
Ting wen yi Hu ◽  
Yue Huang ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Dan Nie ◽  
Zhengyu Li
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionRecently, the safety of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer has been questioned. This study was designed to compare the disease-free survival and overall survival of abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsA total of 1065 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone abdominal/laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2016 in seven hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all patients. Patients with tumor size ≥2 cm and <2 cm were stratified and analyzed separately. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between matched groups. After confirming the normality by the Shapiro-Wilks test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the χ2 test were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.ResultsAfter matching, a total of 812 patients were included in the disease-free survival and overall survival analyses. In the entire cohort, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.73; p=0.048) but not overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.88; p=0.12) when compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy group. In patients with tumor size ≥2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.55; p=0.032) than the abdominal radical hysterectomy group, whereas no significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.83; p=0.10) was found. Additionally, in patients with tumor size <2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy groups had similar disease-free survival (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.16; p=0.59) and overall survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.13; p=0.53).ConclusionLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with inferior disease-free survival compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in the entire cohort, as well as in patients with tumor size ≥2 cm. For the surgical treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer, priority should be given to open abdominal radical hysterectomy.

scholarly journals Clinical implication of oncogenic somatic mutations in early-stage cervical cancer with radical hysterectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takafumi Watanabe ◽  
Hideaki Nanamiya ◽  
Manabu Kojima ◽  
Shinji Nomura ◽  
Shigenori Furukawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Genetic Mutations ◽  
Mutation Status

Abstract It is well known that tumour initiation and progression are primarily an accumulation of genetic mutations. The mutation status of a tumour may predict prognosis and enable better selection of targeted therapies. In the current study, we analysed a total of 55 surgical tumours from stage IB-IIB cervical cancer (CC) patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy including pelvic lymphadenectomy, using a cancer panel covering 50 highly mutated tumorigenesis-related genes. In 35 patients (63.6%), a total 52 mutations were detected (58.3% in squamous cell carcinoma, 73.7% in adenocarcinoma), mostly in PIK3CA (34.5%) and KRAS and TP53 (9.1%). Being mutation-positive was significantly correlated with pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis (P = 0.035) and tended to have a worse overall survival (P = 0.076). In particular, in the patients with squamous cell carcinoma, there was a significant association between being mutation-positive and relapse-free survival (P = 0.041). The patients with PLN metastasis had a significantly worse overall survival than those without (P = 0.006). These results indicate that somatic mutation status is a predictive biomarker for PLN metastasis in early-stage CC, and is consequently related to poor prognosis. Therefore, comprehensive genetic mutations, rather than a single genetic mutation, should be examined widely in order to identify novel genetic indicators with clinical usefulness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document