The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Lateral Tarsal Strip Surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 350-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl C. Golnik ◽  
Vinod Gauba ◽  
George M. Saleh ◽  
Richard Collin ◽  
Milind N. Naik ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000313 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H Dean ◽  
John Buchan ◽  
Fisseha Admassu ◽  
Min J Kim ◽  
Karl C Golnik ◽  
...  

Background/aimsTo develop, test and determine whether a surgical-competency assessment tool for simulated glaucoma surgery is valid.MethodsThe trabeculectomy ophthalmic simulated surgical competency assessment rubric (Sim-OSSCAR) was assessed for face and content validity with a large international group of expert eye surgeons. Cohorts of novice and competent surgeons were invited to perform anonymised simulation trabeculectomy surgery, which was marked using the Sim-OSSCAR in a masked fashion by a panel of four expert surgeons. Construct validity was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Krippendorff’s alpha was calculated for interobserver reliability.ResultsFor the Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, 58 of 67 surgeons (86.6%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR is an appropriate way to assess trainees’ surgical skill. Face validity was rated as 4.04 (out of 5.00). Fifty-seven of 71 surgeons (80.3%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR contents represented the surgical technique of surgical trabeculectomy. Content validity was rated as 4.00. Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that competent surgeons perform better than novices (p=0.02). Interobserver reliability was rated >0.60 (Krippendorff’s alpha) in 19 of 20 steps of the Sim-OSSCAR.ConclusionThe Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, a newly developed and validated assessment tool for simulation glaucoma surgery, has validity and reliability. It has the potential to play a useful role in ophthalmic surgical education.


Author(s):  
William W. Motley ◽  
Karl C. Golnik ◽  
Huban Atilla ◽  
Rachel Pilling ◽  
Aravind Reddy ◽  
...  

Orbit ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-404
Author(s):  
Valerie Juniat ◽  
Karl C. Golnik ◽  
Francesco P. Bernardini ◽  
Altug Cetinkaya ◽  
Aaron Fay ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 805-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Green ◽  
Sarwat Salim ◽  
Deepak P. Edward ◽  
Raghu C. Mudumbai ◽  
Karl Golnik

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1476
Author(s):  
Sieh Yean Kiew ◽  
Ian Yew San Yeo ◽  
Karl C Golnik ◽  
María A Muriel-Herrero ◽  
Vanesa Fuertes-Barahona ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are the most commonly performed intraocular procedure worldwide. Ensuring correct learning is essential to avoid complications. Our purpose was to develop an internationally valid tool to assess skill in performing IVIs. (2) Methods: A panel of six content experts designed a rubric for assessing the IVI procedure by using a modified Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition, dividing it into steps and providing objective behavioral descriptors for each level of skill in each category, following the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) guidance. The rubric draft was then critically reviewed by 12 international content experts, and their constructive comments were considered for the final rubric. (3) Results: The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for IVI (ICO-OSCAR:IVI) is the proposed tool for assessing healthcare professionals training to perform IVI. (4) Conclusions: The ICO-OSCAR:IVI is the result of the consensus of an international expert panel. The methodology used for its development provides this rubric with face and content validity. It can be used globally to assess healthcare professionals training to perform IVI, as well as the impact of different teaching methods on performance. Further studies are required to establish intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as the predictive validity of this tool.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-167
Author(s):  
Janice C. Law ◽  
Karl C. Golnik ◽  
Edward F. Cherney ◽  
J. Fernando Arevalo ◽  
Xiaoxin Li ◽  
...  

Retina ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1797-1804
Author(s):  
Karl C. Golnik ◽  
Janice C. Law ◽  
Kim Ramasamy ◽  
Tamer H. Mahmoud ◽  
Ogugua N. Okonkwo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Juniat ◽  
George M. Saleh ◽  
Milind Naik ◽  
Jeffrey Nerad ◽  
Vinod Gauba ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sintha Sih Dewanti

This study aims to describe: 1) teachers' understandings of skill competency assessment; 2) the application of skills competency assessment in mathematics learning; and 3) teachers' problematics in applying skills competency assessments. This research used the qualitative approach with descriptive research type. The study was conducted in the academic year 2017/2018 and implemented in 9 junior high schools / Islamic junior high schools in the DIY region. Research subjects were 11 mathematics teachers who are selected using purposive sampling technique. The data collected through structured interviewing methods, observation, and documentation. The data were analyzed by using inductive logic, from the particular to the general. The results show that: 1) teachers' understandings of skills competency assessment are quite good. Teachers understood the various instruments and assessment techniques but have not understood the assessment rubric used in each instrument yet; 2) the application of skills competency assessment has already done well but some were still constrained and have not accorded to the assessment standards; 3) teachers' problematics in applying skill competency assessment are: problems of understanding skill competency assessment, time, administrative complexity, student condition, assessment planning including the development of instrument and assessment rubric, and the implementation of skill competency assessment.Keywords: assessment execution, skill competency assessment, Curriculum 2013


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document