MP05-02 PI-RADS 4 AND 5 LESIONS ARE THE RISK FACTORS FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN THE LOW-INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER

145 Background: In men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PC) treated with low dose EBRT, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prolongs overall survival. Zumsteg proposes a subdivision for de IR-PC group: favorable or unfavorable. Purpose: retrospective evaluation of EBRT efficacy according to IR-PC subgroups (favorable or unfavorable). Methods: From the institutional radiotherapy department database, from 2000 to 2011, 95 men with IR-PC were identified and subdivided as follows: Favorable Risk (FR) – Gleason 3+4 or less and positive prostate biopsies (ppb) not exceeding 50% and only one intermediate-risk factor excluding 4+3; Unfavorable risk (UR) – Gleason 4+3 or at least 2 intermediate-risk factors or at least one intermediate risk factor and ppb >50%. Results: 95 patients were included in the analysis, mean FUP 6.2 years. 32.6% (31) had >50% ppb, 14.7% (14) had Gleason 4+3, 38.9% (37) had 2 intermediate-risk factors. 42.1% (40) were FR and 57.9% (55) were UR. Median EBRT dose: 79.8Gy. Only 25% of FR patients received some hormonal therapy treatment. There were no differences in time to Prostatic Specific Androgen (PSA) nadir (FR 12 vs UR 13 months; p= .50), biochemical relapse free survival (RFS) (FR 60 vs US 58 months; p= .80), or doubling time PSA (FR 12 vs UR 11 months; p= .19). Biochemical relapse (BR) and local relapse (LR) rates were lower for FR (BR: FR 27.5 vs UR 38.2%, p= .17; LR: FR 5 vs UR 14.5%, p= .40). Local RFS (FR 13.6 vs UR 9.6 years; p= .11) and distant RFS (FR 13.1 vs UR 12.4 years; p= .65) were longer for FR patients. Conclusions: Short course ADT is the standard treatment in IR-PC patients when EBRT is indicated, especially if they have UR features. In our study IR-PC group had heterogeneous outcomes and, in spite the study limitations, FR patients had a trend for better prognosis even with a very low use of ADT. If Favorable IR-PC patients may avoid ADT morbidity should be answered by a randomized trial.

Download Full-text

Use of genetic instability to predict biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.42 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 42-42

Author(s):

R. G. Bristow ◽

A. S. Ishkanian ◽

C. Malloff ◽

M. Milosevic ◽

M. Pintilie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Genetic Instability ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Biochemical Failure ◽

Comparative Genomic ◽

Specific Gene ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Biochemical Relapse ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer

42 Background: Biomarkers of local and systemic recurrence are needed to individualize patient risk categories and better define treatment. We hypothesized that genomic instability, as measured by percent genome alteration (PGA), can predict for biochemical failure in intermediate- risk prostate cancer. Methods: High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) was used to identify PGA in frozen biopsies from 120 intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Our cohort included 39 T1c tumors, 78 T2 tumors and 2 T3 tumors. The Gleason score was 6 in 32 tumors, 7 in 82 tumors and 8–9 in 6 tumors. PSA ranged from 2.1–33 (median 8.0). Patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with doses of 75.6–79.8 Gy in 1.8–2Gy fractions, or 60–66 Gy in 3 Gy fractions.. Twenty-five percent of patients also received neoadjuvant-concurrent bicalutamide (150mg po od). Biochemical failure, defined by Phoenix criteria or the initiation of salvage therapy, was observed in 35 patients after median follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0.9–8.8). Results: Array CGH showed variable PGA ranging from <1% to 35% (median 6.7%). PSA and the use of hormonal therapy independently influenced biochemical relapse, and formed a baseline clinical model to which PGA was added. PGA was found to be a strong predictor of biochemical relapse (p<0.0001) independent of the clinical prognostic factors (pre-treatment PSA, Gleason score and T-category). PGA was also found to be associated with unique tumour suppressor and oncogene gene loci clusters involved in genetic stability (e.g. loss of PTEN, p53, RB, NKX3.1, ATM, PARP-1 and gain of c-MYC; validated by in situ FISH). Conclusions: This is the first report to show genetic instability can independently predict for biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Current studies are associating specific gene loci regions with clinical outcome. Our results could provide a way forward for individualized medicine for non-indolent prostate cancer based on initial daignostic biopsy material. Supported by Prostate Cancer Canada, The Terry Fox Foundation and the Canadian Cancer Society. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

674 CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION AND BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL FOR INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

The Journal of Urology ◽

10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.229 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 189 (4S) ◽

Author(s):

Boris Gershman ◽

Douglas Dahl ◽

Francis McGovern ◽

Chin-Lee Wu ◽

Michael Blute

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Active Surveillance ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Recurrence Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Clinicopathologic Correlation ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer

Download Full-text

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6

BMC Urology ◽

10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jong Jin Oh ◽

Hyungwoo Ahn ◽

Sung Il Hwang ◽

Hak Jong Lee ◽

Gheeyoung Choe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Potential Candidate ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Tumor Length ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Biopsy Gleason Score ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. Methods From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with MRI. Using PI-RADS scores, patients were divided into two groups, and clinic-pathological outcomes were compared. The impact of preoperative factors on significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (≥ 4 + 3) and biochemical recurrence were assessed via multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2. Results Among the 239 patients, 116 (48.5%) were MRI-negative (PI-RADS ≤ 3) and 123 (51.5%) were MRI-positive (PI-RADS > 3). Six patients in the MRI-negative group (5.2%) were characterized as requiring significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading compared with 34 patients (27.6%) in the MRI-positive group (p < 0.001). PI-RADS score was shown to be a significant predictor of significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (OR = 6.246, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (HR = 2.595, p = 0.043). 10-years biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated to be 84.4% and 72.6% in the MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (p = 0.035). In the 79 patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2, tumor length in biopsy cores was identified as a significant predictor of pathologic Gleason score (OR = 11.336, p = 0.014). Conclusions Among the patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6, preoperative MRI was capable of predicting significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence. Especially, the patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 and low biopsy tumor length could be a potential candidate to active surveillance.

Download Full-text