Abnormal Timing Delays in Auditory Brainstem Responses Evoked by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Children

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Gordon ◽  
Jerome Valero ◽  
Richard van Hoesel ◽  
Blake C. Papsin
2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (01) ◽  
pp. e1-e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Kasbekar ◽  
Yu Chuen Tam ◽  
Robert Carlyon ◽  
John Deeks ◽  
Neil Donnelly ◽  
...  

Objectives A decision on whether to insert a cochlear implant can be made in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) if there is objective evidence of cochlear nerve (CN) function post vestibular schwannoma (VS) excision. We aimed to develop intraoperative CN monitoring to help in this decision. Design We describe the intraoperative monitoring of a patient with NF2 and our stimulating and recording set up. A novel test electrode is used to stimulate the CN electrically. Setting This study was set at a tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Main outcome measure Preserved auditory brainstem responses leading to cochlear implantation. Results Electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) waveforms will be displayed from different stages of the operation. A cochlear implant was inserted at the same sitting based on the EABR. Conclusion Electrically evoked CN monitoring can provide objective evidence of CN function after VS excision and aid in the decision-making process of hearing rehabilitation in patients who will be rendered deaf.


ORL ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kasper ◽  
Marco Pelizzone ◽  
Pierre Montandon

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Schebsdat ◽  
Manuel C. Kohl ◽  
Farah I. Corona-Strauss ◽  
Harald Seidler ◽  
Daniel J. Strauss

The importance of binaural cues in auditory stream formation and sound source segregation is widely accepted. When treating one ear with a cochlear implant (CI) the peripheral auditory system gets partially replaced and processing delays get added potentially, thus important interaural time differences get altered. However, these effects are not fully understood, leaving a lack of systematic binaural fitting strategies with respect to an optimal binaural fusion. To get new insights into such alterations, we suggest a novel method of free-field auditory brainstem evoked responses (ABRs) analysis in CI users. This method does not bypass the technically induced intrinsic delays of the sound processor while leaving the whole electrode array active, thus the most natural way of stimulation is provided. We compared the ABRs collected of 12 CI users and 12 normal hearing listeners using two different stimuli (chirp, click) at four different intensities each. We analyzed the ABRs using the average of 2000 trials as well as a single trial analysis and found consistent results in the ABRs’ amplitudes and latencies, as well as in single trial relationships between both groups. This method provides a new perspective into the natural CI users’ ABRs and can be useful in future research regarding binaural interaction and fusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document