Adjunctive Use of Low-Dose Intralipid Associated With Hemodynamic Improvement in Combined Amlodipine and Labetalol Overdose Refractory to Standard Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. e485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk L. Cumpston ◽  
Ravindra Gopaul ◽  
Brandon Wills
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongyuan Zhang ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Shoujun Li ◽  
Jun Yan

Abstract Background: To evaluate the effect of low-dose exogenous surfactant therapy on infants suffering acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after cardiac surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of infants diagnosed with moderate-severe ARDS after cardiac surgery. A case was defined as a patient that received surfactant and standard therapy, while a control was defined as a patient that underwent standard therapy. The primary endpoint was the improvement in oxygenation index (OI) after 24-hour of surfactant treatment; and secondary endpoints were the ventilator time and PICU time. Results: 22 infants treated with surfactant were matched with 22 controls. Early low-dose (20mg/kg) surfactant treatment was associated with improved outcomes. After surfactant administration for 24-hour, the surfactant group was much better compared with the control group at the 24-hour in OI (difference in average change from baseline, -6.7 [95% CI, -9.3 to -4.1]) (P < 0.01) and VI (mean difference, -11.9 [95% CI, -18.1 to -5.7]) (P < 0.01). Ventilation time and PICU time were significantly shorter in the surfactant group compared with the control group (133.6h±27.2 vs 218.4h±28.7, P < 0.01 ; 10.7d±5.1 vs 17.5d±6.8, P < 0.01). Infants in the surfactant group under 3 months benefit more from OI and VI than the infants over 3 months in a preliminary exploratory analysis.Conclusions: In infants with moderate-severe ARDS after cardiac surgery, early low-dose exogenous surfactant treatment could prominently improve oxygenation and reduce mechanical ventilation time and PICU time. Infants younger than 3 months may get more benefit of oxygenation than the older ones.


2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajid Jalil ◽  
Ahmet Gurakar ◽  
Harlan Wright ◽  
Ted Bader ◽  
Anthony Sebastian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn J Caster ◽  
Neil Solomons ◽  
Simrat Randhawa ◽  
Robert B Huizinga

Abstract Background and Aims Voclosporin (VCS) is a novel high potency calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with a favorable metabolic profile and a consistent predictable dose response potentially eliminating the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. The Aurinia Renal Response in Active Lupus with Voclosporin (AURORA) study, involving 357 patients with active LN, was a Phase 3 global, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VCS (23.7mg BID) vs placebo in combination with mycophenolate (MMF, 2 g/day) and rapidly tapered low dose oral steroids. Method The primary endpoint was renal response (RR) at 52 weeks. RR was defined as UPCR of ≤ 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min, or no confirmed decrease from baseline in eGFR of &gt; 20%, presence of sustained, low dose steroids and no administration of rescue medication. Results AURORA met its primary endpoint, achieving statistically superior RR rates of 40.8% for voclosporin vs. 22.5% for the control (OR 2.65, 95% CI; p &lt; 0.001). The benefits of VCS were also seen for all predetermined secondary endpoints, achieving statistical significance in favor of VCS for RR at 24 weeks, partial renal response (PRR) at 24 and 52 weeks, time to achieve UPCR ≤ 0.5, and time to 50% reduction in UPCR. Prespecified confirmed eGFR decreases &gt;30% were similar in both groups, with 10.1% reported in the VCS group and 10.2% in the control arm (p= 0.971). No significant differences were seen at any timepoints in the study. Furthermore, all pre-specified subgroup analyses (age, sex, race, biopsy class, region, and prior MMF use) also favored VCS. VCS was well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals. Similar SAEs were reported in the VCS group (20.8%) and in the control arm (21.3%). Infection was the most commonly reported SAE with 10.1% of VCS patients versus 11.2% of patients in the control arm. Overall mortality in the trial was low, with 6 deaths observed; 1 in the VCS arm and 5 in the control group. Additionally, the VCS arm showed no significant decrease at week 52 in eGFR or increase in BP, lipids or glucose. Conclusion While maintaining a comparable safety profile, VCS plus standard therapy achieved a statistically superior RR over one year compared to placebo plus standard therapy in adults with active LN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document