The evolving science of apolipoprotein-L1 and kidney disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa K. Chen ◽  
Michelle M. Estrella ◽  
Rulan S. Parekh
2018 ◽  
Vol 267 (6) ◽  
pp. 1161-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayme E. Locke ◽  
Deirdre Sawinski ◽  
Rhiannon D. Reed ◽  
Brittany Shelton ◽  
Paul A. MacLennan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Gudsoorkar ◽  
Manish Anand ◽  
Bassam G. Abu Jawdeh

Background: Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants predispose to nondiabetic kidney disease in African American (AA) patients. Here, we share our experience with APOL1 genotyping of AA potential living kidney donors and offer a perspective on its utility and cost-effectiveness in this population. Methods: Since May 2017, all potential AA living kidney donors at our center underwent APOL1 genotyping early in the donor evaluation process. APOL1 high-risk individuals were declined, whereas those with low-risk genotype continued with further evaluation and testing. Results: One out of 26 potential donors had high-risk genotype and was therefore declined. The rest were eligible to continue the donor evaluation process and 7 of them underwent donor nephrectomy without any complications. A crude cost analysis utilizing our sample suggested probable cost-effectiveness of APOL1 genotyping as it can prevent earlier onset of chronic kidney disease in AA donors. Conclusion: We propose a role for systematically incorporating APOL1 genotyping in the evaluation and informed consent process of potential AA donors while acknowledging the controversial considerations associated with it.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (13) ◽  
pp. 3446-3451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Yue Zhang ◽  
Minxian Wang ◽  
Lei Tian ◽  
Giulio Genovese ◽  
Paul Yan ◽  
...  

People of recent African ancestry develop kidney disease at much higher rates than most other groups. Two specific coding variants in the Apolipoprotein-L1 gene APOL1 termed G1 and G2 are the causal drivers of much of this difference in risk, following a recessive pattern of inheritance. However, most individuals with a high-risk APOL1 genotype do not develop overt kidney disease, prompting interest in identifying those factors that interact with APOL1. We performed an admixture mapping study to identify genetic modifiers of APOL1-associated kidney disease. Individuals with two APOL1 risk alleles and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have significantly increased African ancestry at the UBD (also known as FAT10) locus. UBD is a ubiquitin-like protein modifier that targets proteins for proteasomal degradation. African ancestry at the UBD locus correlates with lower levels of UBD expression. In cell-based experiments, the disease-associated APOL1 alleles (known as G1 and G2) lead to increased abundance of UBD mRNA but to decreased levels of UBD protein. UBD gene expression inversely correlates with G1 and G2 APOL1-mediated cell toxicity, as well as with levels of G1 and G2 APOL1 protein in cells. These studies support a model whereby inflammatory stimuli up-regulate both UBD and APOL1, which interact in a functionally important manner. UBD appears to mitigate APOL1-mediated toxicity by targeting it for destruction. Thus, genetically encoded differences in UBD and UBD expression appear to modify the APOL1-associated kidney phenotype.


FEBS Letters ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 586 (7) ◽  
pp. 947-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-An A. Hu ◽  
Edward I. Klopfer ◽  
Patricio E. Ray

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolubabalo Unati Nqebelele ◽  
Caroline Dickens ◽  
Therese Dix-Peek ◽  
Raquel Duarte ◽  
Saraladevi Naicker

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Friedman ◽  
Martin R. Pollak

FEBS Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (10) ◽  
pp. 1846-1862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok K. Sharma ◽  
David J. Friedman ◽  
Martin R. Pollak ◽  
Seth L. Alper

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 985-985
Author(s):  
Divya G Moodalbail ◽  
Bonita Falkner

Abstract Background and Objectives: Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) renal risk variants prevalent in African-ancestry populations are associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in sickle cell disease (SCD) in adults; yet the prevalence and significance of APOL1 renal-risk variants in this population remains unknown. Our objective was to determine expression of biomarkers of early kidney disease in African American youth with SCD, based on their APOL1 genotype. Methods:We enrolled65 African American subjects between 5 to 21 years of age with SCD (Hb SS or Hb S β0 thalassemia). Blood and concurrent urine samples were collected. Allenrolled subjects underwent APOL1 genotyping by PCR analysis of DNA extracted from whole blood. Presence of two renal-risk variants qualified for APOL1 High Risk (HR) genotype, while presence of zero or one copy of renal-risk variants qualified for APOL1 Low Risk (LR) genotype. Results: APOL1 HR genotype was expressed by 22% of our subjects; this is comparable to 23% prevalence of APOL1 HR genotype in African American adults with CKD (AASK study). Both groups were similar with respect to distribution of age, BMI z-scores, renal function and urine osmolality. Hyperfiltration was noted in both groups based on low serum creatinine for age, and elevated eGFR based on creatinine clearance. However, median urine albumin excretion rate was significantly higher in HR group vs. LR group. Conclusions: Preliminary data in this cohort of 65 children and adolescents with SCD detected greater urine albumin excretion rate in the presence of APOL1 HR genotype. Screening SCD youth for heightened CKD risk may be an avenue to initiate targeted preventive interventions to preserve renal function and reduce progression of kidney disease. Acknowledgment: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM109021; National Kidney Foundation Young Investigator Grant and DE-CTR-ACCEL grant number U54-GM104941 (PI: Binder-Macleod). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-323
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Bruggeman ◽  
John R. Sedor ◽  
John F. O’Toole

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document