Transvaginal Trigger Point Injections Improve Pain Scores in Women With Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity and Pelvic Pain Conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 713-714
Author(s):  
Jamie Bartley ◽  
Esther Han ◽  
Priyanka Gupta ◽  
Natalie Gaines ◽  
Kim A. Killinger ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Bartley ◽  
Esther Han ◽  
Priyanka Gupta ◽  
Natalie Gaines ◽  
Kim A. Killinger ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina S. Fouad ◽  
Paul D. Pettit ◽  
Marcus Threadcraft ◽  
Ali Wells ◽  
Audrey Micallef ◽  
...  

Introduction A retrospective chart review was conducted of visual analog scale (VAS) scores completed before and after trigger point injections (TPIs) for pelvic floor myofascial spasm to evaluate response. Methods Sixty-eight female patients who underwent TPIs from October 9, 2007 to March 12, 2015 were included. The primary end point was the difference between scores. Secondary analyses were conducted for patients who needed repeat TPIs. Descriptive and paired t test analyses were used. Results The key result was an improvement in VAS scores for 65% (44/68) of patients (p<0.0001). The median pre-injection VAS score was 7 (1 to 10), (mean 6.3). The median post-injection VAS score was 4 (0 to 9), (mean 4.3). The median difference between scores in patients who improved was 3 (1 to 8), (mean 3.6). Seventeen of 68 (25%) patients needed repeat TPI, and the median time between injections was 1.5 months (1 to 7 months), (mean 2.2 months). When analyzing pre-injection VAS scores in patients who underwent subsequent repeat injection when compared to patients who did not require repeat injection, there was no difference (p = 0.32). In addition, the differences between pre- and post-injection VAS scores in the patients who underwent repeat injection and those who did not was not significant (p = 0.26). Conclusions We report on 68 women who underwent TPIs, with an improvement in VAS pain scores in 65%. It appears that TPIs for pelvic floor myofascial spasm are successful in reducing pain scores for patients who are refractory to primary therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Yen Chin ◽  
Chih-Wei Peng ◽  
Ming-Ping Wu ◽  
Chih-Hwa Chen ◽  
Yu-Ting Feng ◽  
...  

AbstractMyofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) of pelvic floor muscles is a common cause of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). The pathological mechanisms and treatments of MFPP are complex and still unclear until now. The levator ani muscle (LAM) is the major pelvic floor muscle. The purpose of this study was to examine the fascia and attachment of LAM through the electromyogram (EMG) and cadaver dissection. Electrophysiological stimulation of the obturator fascia above the arcus tendinous levator ani (ATLA) could trigger contraction and electrophysiological changes in LAM insertion. The LAM of embalmed adult cadavers was examined especially in the area above the ATLA. Some skeletal muscle fibers were found above the ATLA within the obturator fascia and were confirmed by Masson’s trichrome section staining. Our electromyography (EMG) and anatomical data implied that the attachment of LAM aponeurosis extended beyond ATLA to the inferior border of the superior ramus of the pubic bone. The new discovered attachment of LAM could provide a reference position for clinical diagnosis and treatment of MFPP or CPP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 454-459
Author(s):  
Manish Pandey ◽  
Vaibhav Shrivastava ◽  
Vijay Patidar ◽  
Sabby Dias ◽  
Sameer Trivedi

Objective: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is characterized by pelvic pain and voiding symptoms, the management of which is challenging. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of biofeedback and pelvic-floor relaxation treatment for CP/CPPS. Methods: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with CP/CPPS were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: conventional therapy (group A) and pelvic-floor muscle relaxation and biofeedback (group B). The Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation apparatus was used for pelvic-floor muscle electrical stimulation and relaxation with biofeedback. National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores were evaluated at the start of therapy, after 3 months of treatment and at 6 months (3 months after last treatment received). Results: At 3 months, patients in both groups had a significant decrease (improvement in symptoms) in NIH-CPSI scoring. However, at 6 months, only 19 (47.5%) patients in group A maintained a fall in NIH-CPSI score >6 compared with 37 (94.8%) patients in group B ( p<0.05). At 6 months, there was significant decrease in NIH-CPSI score in group B, whereas in group A, scores had increased (worsening of symptoms). Conclusions: Pelvic-floor muscle relaxation and biofeedback training is a safe and effective treatment for CP/CPPS with sustained efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document