scholarly journals At Home Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Carnevale ◽  
Paul Richards ◽  
Renee Cohall ◽  
Joshua Choe ◽  
Jenna Zitaner ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley L Shih ◽  
Anna S Graseck ◽  
Gina M Secura ◽  
Jeffrey F Peipert

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa A Cushman ◽  
Susannah K Graves ◽  
Susan J Little

Abstract Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) increase the risk of HIV transmission and are present at high rates among men who have sex with men (MSM). Adherence to HIV/STI testing guidelines is low in the United States. Testing programs that utilize rapid self-administered HIV/STI tests improve testing rates, though multiple factors influence their uptake. Methods MSM were recruited at an HIV/STI testing and treatment program in 2014 and provided consent, demographics, risk behaviors, HIV/STI test preferences, and perceived testing barriers via an online questionnaire. Comparisons of testing preferences and barriers were made based on age, risk group, and HIV serostatus using the Fisher exact test. Results HIV testing preferences included rapid oral test (71.1%), home test location (78.5%), electronic delivery of HIV-negative test results (76.4%), and direct provider notification for HIV-positive test results (70%), with respondents age >45 years being significantly more likely to prefer home testing (P = .033). STI testing preferences included self-collection of specimens (73.2%), home test location (61%), electronic delivery of negative STI test results (76.4%), and direct provider notification for positive STI test results (56.6%) with no significant differences between age, HIV serostatus, or risk groups. The most frequently reported HIV and STI testing barrier was lack of known prior HIV/STI exposure (57.3% for HIV, 62.9% for STI) with respondents age <45 years more frequently citing inconvenience as a barrier to testing (HIV: 50.9% vs 17.4%, P = .010; STI: 58.3% vs 31.8%, P = .070). Conclusions Although additional research is needed, increasing resources directed specifically toward home testing has the potential to translate into improved uptake of rapid HIV/STI testing. Efforts to improve convenience in testing programs must be balanced with the need for continued educational outreach.


2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Schofield ◽  
S. J. Winceslaus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document