scholarly journals Executive Summary of Recommendations and Expert Consensus for Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative—Control/Avoidance of Bleeding (TAXI-CAB)

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Nellis ◽  
Oliver Karam ◽  
Stacey L. Valentine ◽  
Scot T. Bateman ◽  
Kenneth E. Remy ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 227-227
Author(s):  
Arun Saini ◽  
Alina West ◽  
Krista Cowan ◽  
Connor Gatewood ◽  
Ashwini Joshi ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melania M. Bembea ◽  
Michael Agus ◽  
Ayse Akcan-Arikan ◽  
Peta Alexander ◽  
Rajit Basu ◽  
...  

Prior criteria for organ dysfunction in critically ill children were based mainly on expert opinion. We convened the Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) expert panel to summarize data characterizing single and multiple organ dysfunction and to derive contemporary criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction. The panel was composed of 88 members representing 47 institutions and 7 countries. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature to derive evidence-based criteria for single organ dysfunction for neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, acute liver, renal, hematologic, coagulation, endocrine, endothelial, and immune system dysfunction. We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020. Study identification was accomplished using a combination of medical subject headings terms and keywords related to concepts of pediatric organ dysfunction. Electronic searches were performed by medical librarians. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the authors reported original data collected in critically ill children; evaluated performance characteristics of scoring tools or clinical assessments for organ dysfunction; and assessed a patient-centered, clinically meaningful outcome. Data were abstracted from each included study into an electronic data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Consensus was achieved for a final set of 43 criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction through iterative voting and discussion. Although the PODIUM criteria for organ dysfunction were limited by available evidence and will require validation, they provide a contemporary foundation for researchers to identify and study single and multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1309-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Nellis ◽  
Oliver Karam ◽  
Elizabeth Mauer ◽  
Melissa M. Cushing ◽  
Peter J. Davis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cardiovascular instability is common in critically-ill children. There is scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.Methods: Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature - a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document.Results: Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement”, 20 “weak agreement” and 2 had “no agreement”. Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus.Conclusions: These expert consensus-based recommendation may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically-ill children and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.


Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M. Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically ill children. There is a scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature—a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement,” 20 “weak agreement,” and 2 had “no agreement.” Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following the first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to a lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendations may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.


2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement 1 1S) ◽  
pp. e63-e73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Nellis ◽  
Kenneth E. Remy ◽  
Jacques Lacroix ◽  
Jill M. Cholette ◽  
Melania M. Bembea ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically-ill children. There is scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature - a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement”, 20 “weak agreement” and 2 had “no agreement”. Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following first round of voting. Due to lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendation may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically-ill children and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document