Nationwide Survey of School-Based Physical Therapy Practice

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Effgen ◽  
Marcia K. Kaminker
2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 919-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia K Kaminker ◽  
Lisa A Chiarello ◽  
Margaret E O'Neil ◽  
Carol Gildenberg Dichter

Background and Purpose. A nationwide survey was conducted to explore decision making among school-based physical therapists and to examine recommendations regarding the models, contexts, frequency, and intensity of physical therapy service delivery. Factors that the therapists considered important in making clinical decisions also were examined. Subjects and Methods. A survey instrument using a clinical case format was sent to all members of the American Physical Therapy Association's Section on Pediatrics who identified themselves as school-based therapists (N=1,154); 626 respondents, from all 50 states, completed the survey. Four case descriptions were presented in the survey: 2 preschool girls with developmental delay (1 with and 1 without cognitive impairment) and a boy with cerebral palsy (at 6 and 12 years of age). Results. Individual direct services were recommended by 52% to 55% of the respondents for both 4-year-old girls and for the boy at 12 years of age; 92% of the respondents recommended them for the boy at 6 years of age. The most prevalent choice (48%-73%) for the context of service delivery (location or environment) was a combination of integrated and isolated contexts. For those respondents who selected direct services (individual or group, or both), the mean recommended monthly frequency for the boy at 6 years of age (5.8) was more than twice that for the boy at 12 years of age (2.4). The mean suggested direct frequency for the girl with cognitive impairment (4.5) was greater than that for the girl without cognitive impairment (4). The students' functional levels were considered very to extremely important in decision making by 87% to 90% of the respondents. Discussion and Conclusion. Survey responses were relatively consistent with current literature regarding school practice and principles of motor learning. Recommendations varied for each case, regarding the models, contexts, frequency, and intensity of physical therapy service delivery.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Caldwell ◽  
Susan Effgen ◽  
Alejandro Villasante Tezanos ◽  
Lorraine Sylvester ◽  
Lynn M. Jeffries

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey L. Pavelko ◽  
Robert E. Owens ◽  
Marie Ireland ◽  
Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn

Purpose This article examines use of language sample analysis (LSA) by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs), including characteristics of language samples, methods of transcription and analysis, barriers to LSA use, and factors affecting LSA use, such as American Speech-Language-Hearing Association certification, number of years' experience, and caseload characteristics. Method School-based SLPs responded to an invitation to complete an electronic survey related to LSA. Results One third of respondents indicated they did not use LSA during the 2012–2013 school year. SLPs who served middle and high school students were less likely to use LSA. Most respondents reported using conversation to analyze fewer than 10 samples and transcribing in real time. Additional analyses revealed that SLPs who had 3 or fewer years of experience and who analyzed fewer than 20 language samples per year were statistically less likely to report using real-time transcription. The most frequently cited barrier to using LSA was “LSA is too time-consuming.” Conclusion Many school-based SLPs do not routinely use LSA. Further, many did not report engaging in evidence-based practices, such as recording samples, using established protocols, or using tasks designed to elicit complex syntax. These results indicate a continued need for professional development regarding evidenced-based practices relative to LSA use.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Chiarello ◽  
Susan K. Effgen ◽  
Lynn Jeffries ◽  
Sarah Westcott McCoy ◽  
Heather Bush

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 162-166
Author(s):  
Marnie W. Jewell ◽  
Susan E. Roush

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Karnish ◽  
Mary Beth Bruder ◽  
Beverly Rainforth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document