scholarly journals Use of Evidence-Based Practices and Resources Among Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Brooke Steele ◽  
John M. Rose ◽  
Gary Chovnick ◽  
Julie S. Townsend ◽  
Chrisandra K. Stockmyer ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Brooke Steele ◽  
John M. Rose ◽  
Julie S. Townsend ◽  
Jamila Fonseka ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Rochester ◽  
Deborah S. Porterfield ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson ◽  
Kelly McAleer ◽  
Elizabeth Adams ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvana Luciani ◽  
Lianne Vardy ◽  
Eugenio Paci ◽  
Isaac Adewole ◽  
Annie Sasco ◽  
...  

Cancer prevention, screening and early detection can provide some of the greatest public health benefits for cancer control. In low resource settings, where cancer control is challenged by limited human, financial and technical resources, cancer prevention and screening are of utmost importance and can provide significant impacts on the cancer burden. Public policies, social, environmental and individual level interventions which promote and support healthy eating and physical activity can lower cancer risks. Tobacco use, a significant cancer risk factor, can be reduced through the application of key mandates of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. In addition, cancer screening programs, namely for cervical and breast cancers, can have a significant impact on reducing cancer mortality, including in low resource settings. Comprehensive cancer control programs require interventions for cancer prevention, screening and early detection, and involve sectors outside of health to create supportive environments for healthy ways of life. Sharing experiences in implementing cancer control programs in different settings can create opportunities for interchanging ideas and forming international alliances.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Mishka K. Cira ◽  
Allison Dvaladze ◽  
Robel Tesfay ◽  
Jo Anne Zujewski ◽  
Kalina Duncan

PURPOSE The objective of the Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) for Knowledge Summaries for Comprehensive Breast Cancer Control (KSBC) was to strengthen the capacity to plan and implement evidence-based, resource-appropriate breast cancer control programs using virtual case-based learning within a global network of experts and peers. METHODS The KSBC ECHO was a collaboration between the US National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, Women’s Empowerment Cancer Advocacy Network, and Breast Health Global Initiative in alignment with the Breast Cancer Initiative 2.5 campaign to reduce disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Using the ECHO model, we developed a 6-month Web-based program to support the development of locally relevant, resource-appropriate cancer control programs through mentorship and use of KSBCs. The course was advertised via existing networks, conferences, and social media. Breast cancer control project teams from around the world applied and were accepted to participate in the KSBC ECHO. Fourteen biweekly ECHO sessions were held via Zoom and included case presentations, didactic presentations, and discussion. Projects spanned the care continuum and sessions addressed preplanning, assessing need/barriers, setting objectives/priorities, and implementing/evaluating. Baseline and end point surveys were used to evaluate the ECHO program. Participants identified a mentor, completed worksheets, and presented on the project status. RESULTS Fifteen project teams from 11 countries—64 participants: advocates, clinicians, policymakers, and researchers—were enrolled. Twenty-eight participants (57%) completed the baseline and end point surveys. Analysis of the data using a paired t-test indicates that the knowledge increase was statistically significant: The average knowledge gain was 0.76 ± 0.89 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.08; P < .0001). Additional feedback on the Web-based collaborative learning model will be presented. CONCLUSION The ECHO model encouraged interaction between policymakers, clinicians, advocates, and technical experts while using evidence-based tools to develop locally relevant, resource-appropriate implementation strategies and policy recommendations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2023-2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Seeff ◽  
Anne Major ◽  
Julie S. Townsend ◽  
Ellen Provost ◽  
Diana Redwood ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. S536-S542 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Underwood ◽  
Naheed Lakhani ◽  
DeAnna Finifrock ◽  
Beth Pinkerton ◽  
Krystal L. Johnson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Leyva ◽  
Jennifer D. Allen ◽  
Hosffman Ospino ◽  
Laura S. Tom ◽  
Rosalyn Negrón ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Underwood ◽  
Naheed Lakhani ◽  
Elizabeth Rohan ◽  
Angela Moore ◽  
Sherri L. Stewart

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document