scholarly journals Technical Assistance and Training Needs of Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs: a Qualitative Analysis

Author(s):  
Sarah Kerch ◽  
Ruta Brazinskaite ◽  
Mohammad Khalaf ◽  
Liza Fues ◽  
Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1239-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Love ◽  
Catherine Benedict ◽  
Aubrey Van Kirk Villalobos ◽  
Joshua N. Cone

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159S-166S ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Hardy Thornton ◽  
Madeline Barrow ◽  
Dearell Niemeyer ◽  
Barri Burrus ◽  
Allison S. Gertel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Rochester ◽  
Deborah S. Porterfield ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson ◽  
Kelly McAleer ◽  
Elizabeth Adams ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvana Luciani ◽  
Lianne Vardy ◽  
Eugenio Paci ◽  
Isaac Adewole ◽  
Annie Sasco ◽  
...  

Cancer prevention, screening and early detection can provide some of the greatest public health benefits for cancer control. In low resource settings, where cancer control is challenged by limited human, financial and technical resources, cancer prevention and screening are of utmost importance and can provide significant impacts on the cancer burden. Public policies, social, environmental and individual level interventions which promote and support healthy eating and physical activity can lower cancer risks. Tobacco use, a significant cancer risk factor, can be reduced through the application of key mandates of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. In addition, cancer screening programs, namely for cervical and breast cancers, can have a significant impact on reducing cancer mortality, including in low resource settings. Comprehensive cancer control programs require interventions for cancer prevention, screening and early detection, and involve sectors outside of health to create supportive environments for healthy ways of life. Sharing experiences in implementing cancer control programs in different settings can create opportunities for interchanging ideas and forming international alliances.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2023-2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Seeff ◽  
Anne Major ◽  
Julie S. Townsend ◽  
Ellen Provost ◽  
Diana Redwood ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Underwood ◽  
Naheed Lakhani ◽  
Elizabeth Rohan ◽  
Angela Moore ◽  
Sherri L. Stewart

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 186s-186s
Author(s):  
B. Akinwande ◽  
A. Nitzsche

Amount raised: Background and context: International financial institutions (IFIs), including the Islamic Development Bank (IDB), the World Bank Group, multilateral and regional development banks, have played a major role in the social and economic development of low- and middle-income countries. In addition to policy expertise, economic analysis and knowledge products, IFIs provide considerable financial resources to national governments to tackle a wide range of health challenges. Intergovernmental organizations like the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) are providing critical support to advance the socioeconomic development of its member states as well. While there have been some collaborative initiatives to work with national governments to address the growing cancer crisis, more could still be done. With the aim of building a coalition of global partners committed to addressing the growing cancer crisis in low- and middle-income member states, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) approached Islamic Development Bank (IDB) and OIC to highlight the lack of access to effective and sustainable radiotherapy in these member states and to explore potential opportunities to jointly assist member states in their efforts to improve cancer control and expand their radiation medicine services. In 2016, the IAEA, the IDB and the OIC formalized their collaboration through the signing of practical arrangements which encompass technical support, resource mobilization and the implementation of joint activities in comprehensive cancer control in common member states. As the international community acknowledges the increasing global cancer burden and includes an NCD-related target in the sustainable development goals, it is imperative for national governments, multilateral and intergovernmental organizations, including IFIs, to work together if the target is to be met. Aim: To share the experiences of the IAEA-IDB-OIC collaboration and its results so far to provide national decision makers and cancer specialists with a framework to engage a variety of critical international players in their fight against cancer. Strategy/Tactics: IAEA-OIC-IDB practical arrangements on cooperation in the area of comprehensive cancer control in common member states. Program process: Bringing IFIs and low- and middle-income member states together to review their financing needs for the implementation of priority interventions in national cancer control programs and to identify resource mobilization opportunities. Costs and returns: Member states cancer control programs funded by the Islamic Development Bank, and potentially, by other IFIs. What was learned: As the international community acknowledges the rising global cancer burden IFIs have increased their interest in working with governments in low- and middle-income countries to fight cancer. It is important for these countries to seize the opportunities provided by this new development.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
Allison Harvey ◽  
Mohammad Khalaf ◽  
Aubrey Villalobos ◽  
Mandi Chapman

15 Background: In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued six priorities for Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) programs, including addressing needs of cancer survivors (Seeff, 2010). CCC programs identified need for technical assistance (TA), tools and resources in this area. George Washington University (GW) Cancer Center provides TA on survivorship through a 5-year agreement from CDC and contracts from 5 states. Methods: Since 2013, GW developed three online trainings for health care providers with a focus on survivorship. From 2016-2017, GW delivered four tailored in-person workshops to health care professionals (N = 137). GW also produced a survivorship report and a roadmap to implement the patient navigation standard from the Commission on Cancer: both include background information, sample metrics and implementation resources. Results: Across online trainings for oncology and primary care provider (PCP) learners, a majority of participants (N = 1,983) agreed or strongly agreed their knowledge was enhanced (94.6%) and planned to implement strategies/skills/information learned (79.6%). While content varied for workshops, patient-provider communication, survivorship care plans and patient navigation were common topics presented. The majority (n = 74) agreed or strongly agreed their knowledge was enhanced (82.4%) and planned to implement strategies/skills/information learned (86.4%). The survivorship report has been downloaded 11,000+ times in one year and the roadmap nearly 5,000 times in one month. Conclusions: Based on uptake of TA, GW is meeting a need for CCC programs. However, stakeholder feedback indicates programs continue to desire TA support to meet patient navigation and survivorship care standards. Notably, most PCPs are not familiar with survivorship care, and uptake of trainings aimed at PCPs remains low. Opportunities for further TA to troubleshoot challenges in patient navigation and survivorship care remain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document