35-year-old female triathlete with right hip pain

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome is a common cause of lateral hip pain, encompassing a spectrum of disorders, including trochanteric bursitis, abductor tendon pathology, and external coxa saltans. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome is primarily a clinical diagnosis, and careful clinical examination is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment. A thorough history and physical exam may be used to help differentiate greater trochanteric pain syndrome from other common causes of hip pain, including osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, and lumbar stenosis. Although not required for diagnosis, plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful to exclude alternative pathologies or guide treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The majority of patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome respond well to conservative management, including physical therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroid injections. Operative management is typically indicated in patients with chronic symptoms refractory to conservative therapy. A wide range of surgical options, both open and endoscopic, are available and should be guided by the specific etiology of pain. The purpose of this review is to highlight pertinent clinical and radiographic features used in the diagnosis and management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. In addition, treatment indications, techniques, and outcomes are described.

Download Full-text

Ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation to treat refractory knee and hip pain: Outcomes of a case series

Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation ◽

10.1177/22104917211003307 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 ◽

pp. 221049172110033

Author(s):

Ismael Carneiro ◽

Joana Silva ◽

Tiago Lopes ◽

José Luís Carvalho

Keyword(s):

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Pain Control ◽

Case Series ◽

Hip Pain ◽

Ultrasound Guided ◽

Symptomatic Knee ◽

Pain Outcomes

A number of options are currently available to treat symptomatic knee and hip pain. Among them, there is the use of thermal radiofrequency ablation. It is a more recent technique and we still have a lack regarding safety and effectiveness. In this report, we briefly present a case series of patients with refractory knee and hip pain, treated with thermal radiofrequency ablation, where we discuss the results in safety and effectiveness, concerning not only the pain control, but also the return to participation in activities.

Download Full-text

The Prevalence of Radiographic Findings of Structural Hip Deformities for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Hip Pain

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546519896355 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (3) ◽

pp. 647-653 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jun Zhou ◽

Heath P. Melugin ◽

Rena F. Hale ◽

Devin P. Leland ◽

Christopher D. Bernard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Mixed Type ◽

Imaging Modality ◽

Alpha Angle ◽

Young Patients ◽

Radiographic Finding ◽

Hip Pain ◽

Radiographic Findings ◽

Protrusio Acetabuli ◽

Center Edge

Background: Radiography is the initial imaging modality used to evaluate femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and diagnostic radiographic findings are well-established. However, the prevalence of these radiographic findings in patients with hip pain is unknown. Purpose: The purpose was 3-fold: (1) to determine the overall prevalence of radiographic FAI deformities in young patients presenting with hip pain, (2) to identify the most common radiographic findings in patients with cam-type FAI, and (3) to identify the most common radiographic findings in patients with pincer-type FAI. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database was used to identify patients aged 14 to 50 years with hip pain between the years 2000 to 2016. The following were evaluated on radiographs: cam type: typical pistol grip deformity, alpha angle >55°; pincer type: crossover sign (COS), coxa profunda or protrusio acetabuli, lateral center edge angle (LCEA) ≥40°, Tönnis angle <0°; and mixed type: both cam- and pincer-type features. Posterior wall sign (PWS) and ischial spine sign (ISS) were also evaluated. The prevalence of each was determined. Descriptive statistics were performed on all radiographic variables. Results: There were 1893 patients evaluated, and 1145 patients (60.5%; 1371 hips; 374 male and 771 female; mean age, 28.8 ± 8.4 years) had radiographic findings consistent with FAI. Of these hips, 139 (10.1%) had cam type, 245 (17.9%) had pincer type, and 987 (72.0%) had mixed type. The prevalence of a pistol grip deformity and an alpha angle >55° was 577 (42.1%) and 1069 (78.0%), respectively. The mean alpha angle was 66.9°± 10.5°. The prevalence of pincer-type radiographic findings was the following: COS, 1062 (77.5%); coxa profunda, 844 (61.6%); ISS, 765 (55.8%); PWS, 764 (55.7%); Tönnis angle <0°, 312 (22.8%); LCEA ≥40°, 170 (12.4%); and protrusio acetabuli, 7 (0.5%). Conclusion: The overall prevalence of radiographic findings consistent with FAI in young patients with hip pain was 60.5%. Radiographic findings for mixed-type FAI were the most prevalent. The most common radiographic finding for cam-type FAI was an alpha angle >55°. The most common radiographic finding for pincer-type FAI was the COS.

Download Full-text