SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination for participants in “HIV cure”-related clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Peluso ◽  
Meghann C. Williams ◽  
Danielle M. Campbell ◽  
Lynda Dee ◽  
Jeff Taylor ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (10) ◽  
pp. 1655-1659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C Sneller ◽  
Erin D Huiting ◽  
Katherine E Clarridge ◽  
Catherine Seamon ◽  
Jana Blazkova ◽  
...  

Abstract Historical data regarding time to viral rebound following analytical treatment interruption (ATI) have been used to determine therapeutic efficacy in HIV cure trials; however, such data were collected from studies conducted a decade or more ago and included participants receiving older antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens with infrequent virologic monitoring. We conducted a study of 22 HIV-infected participants receiving modern ART to determine the kinetics of plasma viral rebound following ATI. Our data suggest that modern ART does not alter kinetics of viral rebound when compared to previous regimens and that immunologic interventions may be necessary to achieve ART-free virologic remission. Clinical Trials Registration ClinicaTrials.gov identifier: NCT03225118.


AIDS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 885-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R Lewin ◽  
Christine Rouzioux
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Fiorentino ◽  
Christel Protière ◽  
Luis Sagaon-Teyssier ◽  
Mohamed Mimi ◽  
Lisa Fressard ◽  
...  

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Christel Protiere ◽  
Lisa Fressard ◽  
Marion Mora ◽  
Laurence Meyer ◽  
Marie Préau ◽  
...  

HIV cure-related clinical trials (HCRCT) with analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions (ATIs) have become unavoidable. However, the limited benefits for participants and the risk of HIV transmission during ATI might negatively impact physicians’ motivations to propose HCRCT to patients. Between October 2016 and March 2017, 164 French HIV physicians were asked about their level of agreement with four viewpoints regarding HCRCT. A reluctance score was derived from their answers and factors associated with reluctance identified. Results showed the highest reluctance to propose HCRCT was among physicians with a less research-orientated professional activity, those not informing themselves about cure trials through scientific literature, and those who participated in trials because their department head asked them. Physicians’ perceptions of the impact of HIV on their patients’ lives were also associated with their motivation to propose HCRCT: those who considered that living with HIV means living with a secret were more motivated, while those worrying about the negative impact on person living with HIV’s professional lives were more reluctant. Our study highlighted the need to design a HCRCT that minimizes constraints for participants and for continuous training programs to help physicians keep up-to-date with recent advances in HIV cure research.


AIDS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1095-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christel Protiere ◽  
Marion Fiorentino ◽  
Abdourahmane Sow ◽  
Marie Préau ◽  
Marion Mora ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S16-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Daniel Lelièvre

AbstractAnalytical treatment interruption performed during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cure–related clinical trials exposes sex partners of participants in these trials to a risk of HIV transmission. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which emerged in recent years as a key strategy for preventing HIV transmission, is often considered a useful tool to prevent this risk. This article supports offering PrEP to the stable sex partners of participants in these trials but also notes limitations that must be addressed. It concludes that PrEP cannot on its own eliminate the risk of secondary transmission in this context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document