Morphological Characteristics of Round Window Niche in Congenital Aural Atresia and Stenosis Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keguang Chen ◽  
Huiying Lyu ◽  
Youzhou Xie ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Tianyu Zhang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 273 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keguang Chen ◽  
Huiying Lyu ◽  
Youzhou Xie ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Tianyu Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 471-474
Author(s):  
Chang Bae Lee ◽  
Sung Wook Jeong ◽  
Seung Woo Hong

Congenital aural atresia (CAA) is usually accompanied by an anomalous course of facial nerves, which may run over the round window niche toward the promontory in some cases of CAA. Very rarely, cochlear malformation might coexist at the same ear which has CAA, in which case cochlear implantation can be difficult due to anomalous facial nerve. Herein we present a case of cochlear implantation performed in a child who had CAA along with cochlear hypoplasia and cochlear nerve aplasia. The mastoid segment of facial nerve was displaced anteriorly, running over the round window niche. The surgery was done successfully using the round window approach without facial nerve injury.


2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P90-P90
Author(s):  
Marco Carner ◽  
Liliana Colletti ◽  
Marco Barillari ◽  
Roberto Cerini ◽  
Roberto Pozzi Mucelli ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Barillari ◽  
R. Cerini ◽  
M. Carner ◽  
C. Cacciatori ◽  
F. Spagnolli ◽  
...  

ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Youzhou Xie ◽  
Keguang Chen ◽  
Dongming Yin ◽  
Tianyu Zhang ◽  
Peidong Dai

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Studies have shown that higher response levels can be obtained when the bone conduction stimulation position is closer to the cochlea. However, the morphological characteristics of round window niche and posterior tympanum in congenital aural atresia (CAA) and stenosis (CAS) patients were different from the normal. These affected the position of the cochlea at the cranial base. It was still unknown whether the distances from the cranium of CAA and CAS patients to the cochlea were the same as those of normal patients or not. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To measure distances from various points on the lateral surface of the cranium to the cochlea and the cranium thickness on these points among a CAA group, CAS group and normal control group, which may provide valuable information for the better position of bone conduction stimulation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> CT images of CAA, CAS patients and these patients’ healthy sides were analyzed. Firstly, the Frankfurt horizontal plane (Pfrkt) was established. Secondly, a model of part of the cranium was three-dimensionally reconstructed. Then, the Pfrkt plane was rotated down 20, 30 and 40° according to the superior margin of the external auditory canal. At every angle, points 25, 30, 35 and 40 mm away from the superior margin of the external auditory canal were marked out on the surface of the model and recorded as P<sub>20</sub>A, P<sub>30</sub>A, P<sub>40</sub>A, P<sub>20</sub>B, etc. The spatial distances between the cranium and ipsilateral cochlea were defined as lengths of points on the surface of the model to the cochlea apex (CA), cochlear base (CB) and modiolus midpoint (MM), respectively, recorded as P<sub>20</sub>A/CA, P<sub>20</sub>A/CB, P<sub>20</sub>A/MM, P<sub>30</sub>A/CA, etc. <b><i>Results and Conclusions:</i></b> In all groups, the length of P<sub>20</sub>D/CA was the shortest compared to P<sub>30</sub>D/CA and P<sub>40</sub>D/CA (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). The P<sub>20</sub>A/CB and P<sub>20</sub>A/MM were also the shortest (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). When the Pfrkt plane was rotated down 30 and 40°, the results were the same as at 20° (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). However, P<sub>20</sub>D, P<sub>30</sub>D and P<sub>40</sub>D were almost on the mastoid air cells. We suggest that the bone conduction stimulation position is placed closer to the ear, while avoiding the mastoid air cells in the CAA and CAS patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. 470-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keguang Chen ◽  
Dongming Yin ◽  
Huiying Lyu ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Tianyu Zhang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-191
Author(s):  
Dr. Chirag Prafulchandra Vaghela ◽  
◽  
Dr. Priyank Vinodbhai Rathod

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Caughey ◽  
Robert A. Jahrsdoerfer ◽  
Bradley W. Kesser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document