Comparison Study of Different Bowel Preparation Regimens and Different Fecal-Tagging Agents on Tagging Efficacy, Patients' Compliance, and Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomographic Colonography

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Ho Yoon ◽  
Se Hyung Kim ◽  
Sang Gyun Kim ◽  
Soo Jin Kim ◽  
Jeong Min Lee ◽  
...  
The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 365 (9456) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
D ROCKEY ◽  
E PAULSON ◽  
D NIEDZWIECKI ◽  
W DAVIS ◽  
H BOSWORTH ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Bellows ◽  
Giuseppe Gagliardi ◽  
Lorenzo Bacigalupo

Abstract New research has addressed many of the early concerns of Computed Tomographic colonography (CTC) and these studies are now beginning to shape clinical practices. A review of the literature demonstrates that the sensitivity of CTC in screening for large polyps (≥ 1cm) or cancers in the large intestine is as high as that of conventional optical colonoscopy, however, the sensitivity decreases with the diameter of the polyp. Despite this, CTC is well tolerated, more acceptable to patients than optical colonoscopy and therefore may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. This review not only describes the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of CTC, and the evolving role of CTC as a primary colon cancer screening option, but also the recent studies that have demonstrated the additional value of CTC utilization for practicing clinicians.


2010 ◽  
Vol 102 (21) ◽  
pp. 1676-1677
Author(s):  
A. B. Knudsen ◽  
I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar ◽  
C. M. Rutter ◽  
J. E. Savarino ◽  
M. Van Ballegooijen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1690-1699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Halligan ◽  
Douglas G. Altman ◽  
Susan Mallett ◽  
Stuart A. Taylor ◽  
David Burling ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Daniel Johnson ◽  
William S Harmsen ◽  
Lynn A Wilson ◽  
Robert L Maccarty ◽  
Timothy J Welch ◽  
...  

Digestion ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Chaparro ◽  
Javier P. Gisbert ◽  
Lourdes del Campo ◽  
José Cantero ◽  
José Maté

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odery Ramos Jr. ◽  
César Luiz Boguszewski ◽  
Sandra Teixeira ◽  
Ricardo De Bem ◽  
Benito Parolim ◽  
...  

CONTEXT: Acromegalic patients have better chances to develop colorectal polyps and cancer and, considered a high-risk group, need to undergo frequent screening examinations. Moreover, in acromegalia, the increased bowel length and the intestinal loop complexity can lead to higher levels of technical difficulties and increase the risks of complications at conventional colonoscopy. Computed tomographic colonography, also known as virtual colonoscopy, is an innovative and secure technology which is revolutionizing the diagnosis of colon and rectum neoplasias. OBJECTIVE: To analyze computed tomographic colonography performance for the screening of colorectal polyps in acromegalic patients. METHODS: A prospective study of 21 asymptomatic acromegalic patients, 12 male and 9 female, average age 49, who underwent computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy. Computed tomographic colonography was performed with a GE Helical Multislice Computed Tomography Apparatus. Conventional colonoscopy was performed in the same day, without previous knowledge of the computed tomographic colonography diagnostics. The study evaluated the capacity of computed tomographic colonography to detect patients with colorectal polyps and identify each colorectal lesion described by the colonoscopy. RESULTS: In two patients (2/21), conventional colonoscopy was incomplete. However, in all patients computed tomographic colonography was complete. In Phase I ("per patient"), computed tomographic colonography diagnosed eight of the nine patients with colorectal polyps and showed 88% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 81% accuracy. In Phase II ("per polyp"), out of the 21 acromegalic patients included in this study, 12 presented normal findings at conventional colonoscopy. A total of 19 polyps were identified in 9 patients. Ten of the 19 polyps were smaller than 10 mm, and 9 were equal to or larger than 10 mm. Computed tomographic colonography identified 7 of the 9 polyps >10 mm described by conventional colonoscopy and only 6 of the 10 small polyps identified at conventional colonoscopy were detected by computed tomographic colonography. The histological analysis of resected lesions revealed 12 tubular adenomas, 6 hyperplastic polyps and 1 colonic tubulo-villous adenoma with an adenocarcinoma focus. CONCLUSION: The authors present the first reports of computed tomographic colonography in the screening of colorectal polyps in acromegalic patients. In this study, computed tomographic colonography was performed without complications and a complete and safe colorectal evaluation was possible in all acromegalic patients. Moreover, computed tomographic colonography presented good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the identification of acromegalic patients with polyps of any size and better results in the diagnosis of large polyps, when they were compared to small polypoid lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document