Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment for Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Vertical Maxillary Excess, Anterior Open Bite, and Transverse Maxillary Deficiency

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. e531-e535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hwan Choi ◽  
Jung-Yul Cha ◽  
Da-Young Kang ◽  
Chung-Ju Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Maxillary Deficiency

Abordagem precoce da má oclusão de Classe II esquelética com atresia maxilar e mordida aberta anterior e o uso de alinhadores ClearCorrect – relato de caso

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (53) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
Roberto Hideo Shimizu ◽  
Isabela Almeida Shimizu ◽  
Ana Cláudia M. Melo Toyoffuku ◽  
Rebecca Marquesini ◽  
Tatiane Travizan Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
High Predictability

Adequate planning and early treatment of Angle Class II malocclusion with maxillary atresia and anterior open bite provides harmonization of maxillomandibular bone bases in the three planes of space. Orthodontic aligners have emerged as an alternative treatment having the following advantages: being more aesthetic and more comfortable for the patient, less treatment time when they are correctly indicated, less chairside time, less complications, possibility of remote monitoring, easier feeding, and dental hygiene. On the other hand, they offer difficulties to treat adults with severe skeletal Class II malocclusions, posterior crossbite and anterior open bite. Therefore, the objective of this clinical case report is to early correct skeletal Class II malocclusion with maxillary atresia through the use of mechanical orthopedics and devices that help eliminate habits and close the anterior open bite, and later the use of orthodontic aligners to finish the treatment. It was concluded that the early interceptive treatment of malocclusion was efficient to harmonize the bone bases in the anteroposterior, vertical, and transversal directions, changing this malocclusion from high to low complexity and, consequently, highly predictable and with an excellent prognosis for treatment with orthodontic aligners. The treatment with ClearCorrect aligners corrected the occlusion in a shorter period of time when compared to corrective orthodontics and with a high predictability in relation to the virtual setup.

Orthopedic approach in the treatment of a skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with an anterior open bite

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
N. Al-Sulaiti ◽  
G. White
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Facial Bones ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Correct Position ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1

The patient presented with it skeletal class II malocclusion characterized by an anterior open bite and maxillary midline deviation. This mixed dentition case was treated orthopedically with MRI appliance to rotate and impact the maxilla. A Bionator was used advance the mandible. The case was completed using Occlus-O-Guide. The result showed that the facial bones and teeth appear in the correct position.

Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Adolescent with Anterior Open Bite using Mini-Screws and Modified Palatal Anchorage Plate

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
YA Kook ◽  
JH Park ◽  
Y Kim ◽  
CS Ahn ◽  
M Bayome
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
And Control

This article presents a non-extraction orthodontic treatment case using mini-screws and a modified palatal anchorage plate (MPAP) to intrude the maxillary posterior teeth, and distalize the whole arch dentition and control the extrusion of the maxillary posterior dentition during distalization.

scholarly journals A combined Surgical-Orthodontic treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
Prathyaksha Shetty ◽  
Dipjyothi Baruah ◽  
Amit Rekhawat ◽  
Karthik Cariappa ◽  
Sujala Ganapati Durgekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Mandibular Advancement ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Sagittal Split Osteotomy ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Facial Esthetics ◽  
Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy ◽  
Common Problems

Skeletal Class II malocclusion with mandibular deficiency is one of the most common problems that patients seek treatment. Adult patients with severe skeletal Class II malocclusion need orthognathic surgery for successful treatment. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most often preferred technique for these patients. This case report briefs about two male patient of age 24 years presented with Class II Skeletal relation, mesoprosopic facial form, horizontal growth pattern and Angle’s Class II div 1 malocclusion who were treated with Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) mandibular advancement. The ideal anteroposterior relation was established along with a Class I molar, incisor, canine relationship and ideal overjet, overbite and the overall facial esthetics were significantly improved. Combined surgical-orthodontic treatment aims to obtain a more harmonious facial, skeletal, dental and soft tissue relationship with an added patient self esteem.

scholarly journals A case of severe open bite malocclusion with crowding and short roots treated by two-jaw surgery including four-piece LeFort I osteotomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro Hoshijima ◽  
Naoki Oka ◽  
Tatsushi Matsumura ◽  
Seiji Iida ◽  
Hiroshi Kamioka
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Mandibular Advancement ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Skeletal Deformity ◽  
Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Jaw Surgery

Abstract BackgroundAppropriate operations in severe anterior open bite (AOB) cases are extremely complicated to perform because of the multiple surgical procedures involved, difficulty of predicting posttreatment aesthetics and high relapse rate.Case reportWe herein report a 16-year-old girl with skeletal Class II, severe AOB malocclusion and crowding with short roots and aesthetic and functional problems. Four-piece segmental LeFort I osteotomy combined with a posterior horseshoe-like osteotomy was performed for maxillary intrusion, and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and genioplasty were performed for mandibular advancement. The malocclusion and skeletal deformity were significantly improved by the surgical orthodontic treatment. Functional and aesthetic occlusion with an improved facial profile was established, and no further root shortening was observed. Acceptable occlusion and dentition were maintained after a two-year retention period.ConclusionThis strategy of surgical orthodontic treatment with a complicated operative procedure might be effective for managing severe AOB malocclusion.

Classe II, divisão 1 – da dentição mista à permanente com aparelho ortopédico funcional e fixo

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (54) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Ivan Pedro Taffarel ◽  
Fernando Augusto Casagrande ◽  
Itamar Antonio Taffarel ◽  
Thiago Martins Meira ◽  
Orlando Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
The Face

Orthodontic treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in one or two phases is still controversial in contemporary Orthodontics. The present clinical case presents the orthodontic treatment of a 6-year-old patient with aesthetic complaint regarding the smile and bullying, presenting skeletal Class II, Class II malocclusion, Angle division 1, overjet with exaggerated protrusion of the maxillary incisors, exaggerated overbite with the lower incisors touching the palatal mucosa, absence of lip sealing and concave inferior face profile. In Phase I, rapid maxillary expansion was performed with Hyrax-type expander together with the Herbst fixed functional orthopedic device for 11 months. In Phase II, the fixed orthodontic appliance associated with intermaxillary elastics was used for 13 months. The two-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion, division 1 showed to be effective after 24 months, establishing adequate occlusal and functional results and improving the aesthetics of the lower third of the face.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document