Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) for Persistent Duodenal Stump Dehiscence After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery in Selected Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Mutignani ◽  
Lorenzo Dioscoridi ◽  
Mutaz Massad ◽  
Giulia Bonato ◽  
Francesco Pugliese ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (05) ◽  
pp. E166-E167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Hun Chon ◽  
Isabel Bartella ◽  
Martin Bürger ◽  
Isabel Rieck ◽  
Tobias Goeser ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Jung ◽  
Rachel Hallit ◽  
Annegret Müller-Dornieden ◽  
Melanie Calmels ◽  
Diane Goere ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) with double pigtail stents and low negative pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are treatment options for leakages after upper GI oncologic surgery. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these techniques. Patients and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, patients treated with EID in five centers in France and with EVT in Göttingen, Germany were included and retrospectively analyzed using univariate analysis. Pigtails were changed every 4 weeks, EVT was repeated every 3-4 days until leak closure. Results: 35 EID and 27 EVT patients were included, with a median leak size of 0.75 cm (0.5-1.5). Overall treatment success was 100% [CI 90; 100] in EID vs. 85.2% [CI 66.3; 95.8] in EVT, p=0.03. The median number of endoscopic procedures was 2 (2; 3) vs. 3 (2; 6.5), p<0.01 and the median treatment duration was 42 (28; 60) vs. 17 days (7.5; 28), p<0.01, for EID vs. EVT, respectively. Conclusion: EID and EVT provide high closure rates for upper GI anastomotic leakages. EVT provides a shorter treatment duration at the cost of a higher number of procedures.


2021 ◽  
pp. 5-16
Author(s):  
Vladimir Alekseevich Porkhanov ◽  
Stanislav Nikolayevich Pyatakov ◽  
Alexander Gennadievich Baryshev ◽  
Denis Mikhailovich Melnik ◽  
Maxim Sergeevich Shevchenko ◽  
...  

This article describes the clinical case of treatment of a patient with perforation of the esophageal wall and mediastinitis by the method of endoscopic vacuum therapy. Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy, also known as Negative Pressure Endoscopic Therapy (E-NPWT, EVT), is an innovative endoscopic option for the treatment of transmural defects in hollow organs, as well as a safe and effective instrument that promotes defect healing through macrodeformation, microdeformation, perfusion changes, controls exudate and bacterial clearance. The goal of endoscopic vacuum therapy is to avoid radical surgical interventions and their complications, as well as to improve patient’s quality of life in the postoperative period.


2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S1203
Author(s):  
Rui Morais ◽  
Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto ◽  
Rodrigo Liberal ◽  
Rui Gaspar ◽  
Cristina Fernandes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Hyun Jung ◽  
Hae-Ryong Yun ◽  
Se Joon Lee ◽  
Na Won Kim ◽  
Cheal Wung Huh

Abstract A transmural defect of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract is a life-threatening condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has shown rather excellent efficacy in managing UGI defects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the available evidence on the efficacy of EVT in patients with transmural defects of the UGI tract. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for publications on the effect of EVT on successful closure, mortality, complications, and post-EVT stricture. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. This meta-analysis included 29 studies involving 498 participants. The pooled estimate rate of EVT for successful closure was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81–0.88). The pooled estimate rate for mortality, complications, and post-EVT stricture was 0.11, 0.10, and 0.14, respectively. According to the aetiology of the transmural defect (perforation vs. leak and fistula), no significant difference was found in successful closure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.45–4.67), mortality (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.24–2.46), complications (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.17–5.15), and post-EVT stricture (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.12–4.24). The successful closure rate was significantly higher with EVT than with self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement (OR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.79–6.91). In conclusion, EVT is an effective and safe treatment for treating leaks and fistulae as well as perforations in UGI defects. Moreover, EVT seems to be a better treatment option than SEMS placement in healing UGI defects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 3449-3458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Kuehn ◽  
Gunnar Loske ◽  
Leif Schiffmann ◽  
Michael Gock ◽  
Ernst Klar

2014 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
pp. e98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike G. Laukoetter ◽  
Norbert Senninger ◽  
Mario Colombo-Benkmann ◽  
Rudolf Mennigen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document