Establishing an Acute Care Surgery Service: Lessons Learned From the Epidemiology of Emergent Non-Trauma Patients and Increasing Utilization of Laparoscopy

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 938-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L. Speer ◽  
Helen J. Sohn ◽  
Ashkan Moazzez ◽  
Jason Portillo ◽  
Tatyan Clarke ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 236-244
Author(s):  
Meera Kapadia ◽  
Omar Obaid ◽  
Adam Nelson ◽  
Ahmad Hammad ◽  
Daniel James Kitts ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1418-1423
Author(s):  
Reynold Henry ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Rachel N. Henry ◽  
Gregory A. Magee ◽  
Christoper P. Foran ◽  
...  

For trauma patients with noncompressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH), aortic occlusion (AO) is attempted with either resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). However, it is often challenging to identify the group of patients who would benefit from AO procedures. We hypothesized that patients who met simple clinical criteria would have better outcomes following AO procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery database (November 2013-August 2019) which included patients who arrived with signs of life and underwent AO procedures (RT or zone 1 REBOA). Outcomes were compared between patients who met the criteria (admission vital signs: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥9 and systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and those who did not. Subgroup analyses were then conducted on patients who had a REBOA placed and those who underwent RT. A total of 998 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, a REBOA was placed in 364 patients (37%), while 634 (64%) underwent RT. The overall mortality rate in the criteria (+) group was significantly lower than that in the criteria (−) group (62 vs. 79%, P < .001). In patients who survived beyond the emergency department following AO procedures, those who met the criteria underwent hemorrhage control procedures more frequently (83% vs. 57%, P < .001). Our data suggest that simple clinical criteria could guide the provider for proceeding with AO in patients with suspected NCTH.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin Mathur ◽  
Chung Fai Jeremy Ng ◽  
Fangju Koh ◽  
Mingzhe Cai ◽  
Gautham Palaniappan ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps across the world, healthcare departments must adapt to meet the challenges of service provision and staff/patient protection. Unlike elective surgery, Acute care surgery (ACS) workloads cannot be artificially reduced providing a unique challenge for administrators to balance healthcare resources between the COVID-19 surge and regular patient admissions. MethodsAn extended ACS (eACS) model of care is described with the aim of limiting COVID-19 healthcare worker and patient cross-infection as well as providing 24/7 management of emergency general surgical (GS) and trauma patients. The eACS service comprised 5 independent teams covering a rolling 1:5 24-hr call. Attempts to completely separate eACS teams and patients from the elective side were made. The service was compared to the existing ACS service in terms of clinical and efficiency outcomes. Finally, a survey of staff attitudes towards these changes, concerns regarding COVID-19 and psychological well-being was assessed.ResultsThere were no staff/patient COVID-19 cross-infections. Compared to the ACS service, eACS patients had reduced overall length of stay (2-days), time spent in the Emergency Room (46 minutes) and time from surgery to discharge (2.4-hours). Mortality was decreased during this time. The eACS model of care saved financial resources and bed-days for the organisation. The changes were well received by team-members who also felt that their safety was prioritised.ConclusionIn healthcare systems affected by COVID-19, an eACS model may assist in preserving psychological well-being for healthcare staff whilst providing 24/7 care for emergency GS and trauma patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffry L Kashuk ◽  
Ernest E Moore ◽  
Sarah Pinski ◽  
Jeffrey L Johnson ◽  
John B Moore ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. e159-e160
Author(s):  
Patricia Mulero-Soto ◽  
Omar J. Rovira ◽  
Aihab Aboukheir ◽  
Gabriel Pereira ◽  
Jorge Martinez-Trabal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dequan Xu ◽  
Yue Yin ◽  
Limin Hou ◽  
Haoxin Zhou

AbstractThere was a fast growth in the number and the formation of emergency department (ED) visits in China during the twenty-first century. As a result, engaging special medical model will be essential to decompressing the ED visits. To do this, it will be important to understand which specific aspects to focus interventions on for the greatest impact. To characterize the emergency surgery patients who were seen and discharged from ED. Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized emergency surgery patients currently under the care from specialists presenting to an urban, university affiliated hospital between 01 January 2018 and 1 January 2019. This study will highlight some of the controversies and challenges and key lessons learned. During the study period there were 231,229 ED visits; 4100 of these patients were admitted for Acute care surgery (ACS) service. Multivariate analysis identified age ≧ 65 (p = 0.023; odds ratio, OR = 2.66), ACS model (p = 0.000, OR = 0.18), ICU stay (p = 0.000, OR = 118.73) as factors associated with in-hospital mortality. There was a increase in length of stay between young and elderly postoperative patients when stratifying patients by age (11.67 ± 9.48 vs 13.95 ± 9.11 p < 0.05). ED overcrowding is not just an ED problem. ED overcrowding is a systems problem requiring a systematic facility-wide multidisciplinary response. Continuous and high-quality surveillance data across China are needed to estimate the acute care surgery model which used to deal with ED overcrowding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. S121
Author(s):  
Meera Kapadia ◽  
Kamil Hanna ◽  
Ashley Northcutt ◽  
Abdul Tawab K. Saljuqi ◽  
Michael Ditillo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 646-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A. Quick ◽  
Jennifer M. Meyer ◽  
Jeffrey P. Coughenour ◽  
Stephen L. Barnes

Optimal dosing of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has yet to be defined and varies widely due to concerns of efficacy and thrombosis. We hypothesized a dose of 15 IU/kg actual body weight of a three-factor PCC would effectively correct coagulopathy in acute care surgery patients. Retrospective review of 41 acute care surgery patients who received 15 IU/kg (610%) actual body weight PCC for correction of coagulopathy. Demographics, laboratory results, PCC dose, blood and plasma transfusions, and thrombotic complications were analyzed. We performed subset analyses of trauma patients and those taking warfarin. Mean age was 69 years (18–94 years). Thirty (73%) trauma patients, 8 (20%) emergency surgery patients, 2 (5%) burns, and 1 (2%) non-trauma neurosurgical patient were included. Mean PCC dose was 1305.4 IU (14.2 IU/kg actual body weight). Mean change in INR was 2.52 to 1.42 (p 0.00004). Successful correction (INR <1.5) was seen in 78 per cent. Treatment failures had a higher initial INR (4.3 vs 2.03, p 0.01). Mean plasma transfusion was 1.46 units. Mean blood transfusion was 1.61 units. Patients taking pre-hospital warfarin (n = 29, 71%) had higher initial INR (2.78 vs 1.92, p 0.05) and received more units of plasma (1.93 vs 0.33, p 0.01) than those not taking warfarin. No statistical differences were seen between trauma and nontrauma patients. One thrombotic event occurred. Administration of low-dose PCC, 15 IU/kg actual body weight, effectively corrects coagulopathy in acute care surgery patients regardless of warfarin use, diagnosis or plasma transfusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document