Mortality and Regional Oxygen Saturation Index in Septic Shock Patients: A Pilot Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Rodriguez ◽  
Thiago Lisboa ◽  
Ignacio Martín-Loeches ◽  
Emili Díaz ◽  
Sandra Trefler ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-419
Author(s):  
Özden Özgür HOROZ ◽  
Nagehan ASLAN ◽  
Dinçer YILDIZDAŞ ◽  
Yasemin ÇOBAN ◽  
Yaşar SERTDEMİR ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Marín-Corral ◽  
L. Claverias ◽  
M. Bodí ◽  
S. Pascual ◽  
A. Dubin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ala Nozari ◽  
Shivali Mukerji ◽  
Molly Vora ◽  
Alfonso Garcia ◽  
Alyssa Park ◽  
...  

Background. Acute respiratory failure from COVID-19 pneumonia is a major cause of death after SARS-COVID-19 infection. We investigated whether PaO2/FiO2, oxygenation index (OI), SpO2/FiO2, and oxygen saturation index (OSI), commonly used to assess the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), can predict mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Methods. In this single-centered retrospective pilot study, we enrolled 68 critically ill mechanically ventilated adult patients with confirmed COVID-19. Physiological variables were recorded on the day of intubation (day 0) and postintubation days 3 and 7. The association between physiological parameters, PaO2/FiO2, OI, SpO2/FiO2, and OSI with mortality was assessed using multiple variable logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. Results. The ARDS severity indices were not statistically different on the day of intubation, suggesting similar baseline conditions in nonsurviving and surviving patients. However, these indices were significantly worse in the nonsurviving as compared to surviving patients on postintubation days 3 and 7. On intubation day 3, PaO2/FiO2 was 101.0 (61.4) in nonsurviving patients vs. 140.2 (109.6) in surviving patients, p = 0.004 , and on day 7 106.3 (94.2) vs. 178.0 (69.3), p < 0.001 . OI was 135.0 (129.7) in nonsurviving vs. 84.8 (86.1) in surviving patients ( p = 0.003 ) on day 3 and 150.0 (118.4) vs. 61.5 (46.7) ( p < 0.001 ) on day 7. OSI was 12.0 (11.7) vs. 8.0 (10.0) ( p = 0.006 ) on day 3 and 14.7 (13.2) vs. 6.5 (5.4) ( p < 0.001 ) on day 7. Similarly, SpO2/FiO2 was 130 (90) vs. 210 (90) ( p = 0.003 ) on day 3 and 130 (90) vs. 230 (50) ( p < 0.001 ) on day 7, while OSI was 12.0 (11.7) vs. 8.0 (10.0) ( p = 0.006 ) on day 3 and 14.7 (13.2) vs. 6.5 (5.4) ( p < 0.001 ) on day 7 in the nonsurviving and surviving patients, respectively. All measures were independently associated with hospital mortality, with significantly greater odds ratios observed on day 7. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for mortality prediction was greatest on intubation day 7 (AUC = 0.775, 0.808, and 0.828 for PaO2/FiO2, OI, SpO2/FiO2, and OSI, respectively). Conclusions. Decline in oxygenation indices after intubation is predictive of mortality in COVID-19 patients. This time window is critical to the outcome of these patients and a possible target for future interventions. Future large-scale studies to confirm the prognostic value of the indices in COVID-19 patients are warranted.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arisa Muratsu ◽  
Tomoya Hirose ◽  
Mitsuo Ohnishi ◽  
Jotaro Tachino ◽  
Shunichiro Nakao ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundIn the field of emergency medical care, we often experience a situation in which we cannot measure pulse oximetric saturation (SpO₂) or blood pressure due to circulatory failure associated with shock. However, as we can measure rSO₂ values of the brain even in patients with shock, we hypothesized that we could evaluate the oxygen supply-demand balance between brain and muscle tissue by simultaneously measuring regional oxygen saturation (rSO₂) values of the brain and muscle tissue of patients with shock.Case presentationWe attached a TOS-OR rSO₂ monitor (TOSTEC CO., Tokyo, Japan) to 10 healthy volunteers and measured the rSO₂ values of their brain and muscle for 3 minutes. The rSO₂ values of their brain cerebral regional oxygen saturation (crSO₂) and muscle regional oxygen saturation (mrSO₂) were 77.6±1.6% and 76.2±1.3% (mean ± SD). There was little difference between crSO₂ and mrSO₂ (cerebro-musculoskeletal difference in regional saturation of oxygen; c-mDrSO₂). However, there were discernible amount of c-mDrSO₂ in three cases with shock, Case 1 showed a prolonged shock state due to septic shock caused by bacterial pneumonia. Her crSO₂ values was always higher than her mrSO₂ value, and there was a c-mDrSO₂. Case 2 showed a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) with the development of septic shock caused by intestinal perforation. His crSO₂ value was higher than that of his mrSO₂, and c-mDrSO₂ increased with the decrease of his MAP. Case 3 had a low MAP due to hemorrhagic shock caused by postpartum hemorrhage. Her crSO₂ value was higher than that of her mrSO₂ and a c-mDrSO₂ was present. After resuscitation, the c-mDrSO₂ decreased with the increase in her blood pressure.ConclusionWe evaluated the usefulness of simultaneous measurement of crSO₂ and mrSO₂ as an objective and non-invasive method in shock management. Even if SpO₂ or blood pressure could not be measured due to circulatory failure associated with shock, it was possible to measure the values of crSO₂ and mrSO₂, which changed in real time with fluctuation of the blood pressure. Unlike previous monitoring devices, the rSO₂ monitor may continuously and clearly reflect the changes in local oxygen supply-demand balance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. 1213e-1214e
Author(s):  
Yu Kagaya ◽  
Shimpei Miyamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document