Comparison of the Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerrie-Anne Ho ◽  
Janet L. Taylor ◽  
Colleen K. Loo
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Adam Z. Gardi ◽  
Amanda K. Vogel ◽  
Aastha K. Dharia ◽  
Chandramouli Krishnan

Background: There is a growing concern among the scientific community that the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are highly variable across studies. The use of different tDCS devices and electrode sizes may contribute to this variability; however, this issue has not been verified experimentally. Objective: To evaluate the effects of tDCS device and electrode size on quadriceps motor cortical excitability. Methods: The effect of tDCS device and electrode size on quadriceps motor cortical excitability was quantified across a range of TMS intensities using a novel evoked torque approach that has been previously shown to be highly reliable. In experiment 1, anodal tDCS-induced excitability changes were measured in twenty individuals using two devices (Empi and Soterix) on two separate days. In experiment 2, anodal tDCS-induced excitability changes were measured in thirty individuals divided into three groups based on the electrode size. A novel Bayesian approach was used in addition to the classical hypothesis testing during data analyses. Results: There were no significant main or interaction effects, indicating that cortical excitability did not differ between different tDCS devices or electrode sizes. The lack of pre-post time effect in both experiments indicated that cortical excitability was minimally affected by anodal tDCS. Bayesian analyses indicated that the null model was more favored than the main or the interaction effects model. Conclusions: Motor cortical excitability was not altered by anodal tDCS and did not differ by devices or electrode sizes used in the study. Future studies should examine if behavioral outcomes are different based on tDCS device or electrode size.


Author(s):  
Pedro Caldana Gordon ◽  
Leandro da Costa Lane Valiengo ◽  
Vanessa Jesus Rodrigues de Paula ◽  
Ricardo Galhardoni ◽  
Ulf Ziemann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itai Berger ◽  
Ornella Dakwar-Kawar ◽  
Ephraim S. Grossman ◽  
Mor Nahum ◽  
Roi Cohen Kadosh

AbstractVarious methods have been attempted to effectively ameliorate psychiatric and neurological conditions in children and adults. One of the attractive ideas is to develop interventions to create a lasting, rather than only an immediate, effect. Neurostimulation has been shown to yield long-term effect when combined with cognitive training in healthy young adults. We examined whether such approach could benefit children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the most common neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood. We used a randomized double-blind active-controlled crossover study of 19 unmedicated children (aged 7–12 years old) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, who received either transcranial direct current stimulation or random noise stimulation while completing five-day executive functions training, which includes working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition tasks. Both stimulation protocols have previously shown potential for inducing lasting benefits in adults, while transcranial direct current stimulation was examined in multiple attention deficit hyperactivity disorder studies and has been highlighted as a promising method for treating neuropsychological deficits. For our primary outcome, transcranial random noise stimulation yielded a clinical improvement as indicated by the reduced attention deficit hyperactivity disorder rating scale score from baseline, and in comparison to the changes observed in transcranial direct current stimulation. Moreover, the effect of brain stimulation one week after completion of treatment yielded further improvement, suggesting a neuroplasticity-related effect. Finally, transcranial random noise stimulation improved working memory compared to transcranial direct current stimulation, and a larger transcranial random noise stimulation effect on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder rating scale was predicted for those patients who showed the greatest improvement in working memory. Our results provide a promising direction toward a novel intervention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, which is shown to have a lasting effect via the modulating of neuroplasticity, rather than a merely immediate effect as was shown for in previous medical interventions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Haller ◽  
Alkomiet Hasan ◽  
Frank Padberg ◽  
Wolfgang Strube ◽  
Leandro da Costa Lane Valiengo ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungÜber die letzten Jahre entwickelten sich Neuromodulationsverfahren zu einer dritten Säule neben Pharmakotherapie und Psychotherapie in der Behandlung psychischer Erkrankungen. Besonders in der Behandlung von Menschen mit einer Schizophrenie könnten Hirnstimulationsverfahren eine Alternative oder Ergänzung zu den etablierten Therapiestrategien darstellen. Die meist vorhandenen Positivsymptome können zumeist mit Antipsychotika adäquat behandelt werden. Gerade bei Patienten mit Schizophrenie besitzen jedoch Negativsymptome einen überdauernden Krankheitswert und beeinflussen den Verlauf durch globale Antriebsverarmung und beeinträchtigte Kognition im alltäglichen Leben negativ. Dieser Übersichtsartikel stellt eine Zusammenfassung über die verschiedenen nichtinvasiven Hirnstimulationsverfahren transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS), Wechselstromstimulation (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) sowie Rauschstromstimulation (transcranial random noise stimulation, tRNS) zur Behandlung der Negativsymptomatik bei Schizophrenie dar. Die neuen transkraniellen Hirnstimulationsverfahren könnten dabei helfen, gestörte neuronale Vernetzungen wieder herzustellen und die Konnektivität vor allem der dorsolateralen präfrontalen Anteile des Kortex zu verbessern. Einige Studien weisen auf eine Verbesserung der Negativsymptome durch Behandlung mit tDCS, tACS bzw. tRNS hin und könnten so neue Therapiemöglichkeiten in der Behandlung der Schizophrenie darstellen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document