scholarly journals Opposing role of condensin hinge against replication protein A in mitosis and interphase through promoting DNA annealing

Open Biology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 110023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Akai ◽  
Yumiko Kurokawa ◽  
Norihiko Nakazawa ◽  
Yuko Tonami-Murakami ◽  
Yuki Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein A ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Mutation Site ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes

Condensin is required for chromosome dynamics and diverse DNA metabolism. How condensin works, however, is not well understood. Condensin contains two structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) subunits with the terminal globular domains connected to coiled-coil that is interrupted by the central hinge. Heterotrimeric non-SMC subunits regulate SMC. We identified a novel fission yeast SMC hinge mutant, cut14-Y1 , which displayed defects in DNA damage repair and chromosome segregation. It contains an amino acid substitution at a conserved hinge residue of Cut14/SMC2, resulting in diminished DNA binding and annealing. A replication protein A mutant, ssb1-418 , greatly alleviated the repair and mitotic defects of cut14-Y1 . Ssb1 protein formed nucleolar foci in cut14-Y1 cells, but the number of foci was diminished in cut14-Y1 ssb1-418 double mutants. Consistent with the above results, Ssb1 protein bound to single-strand DNA was removed by condensin or the SMC dimer through DNA reannealing in vitro . Similarly, RNA hybridized to DNA may be removed by the SMC dimer. Thus, condensin may wind up DNA strands to unload chromosomal components after DNA repair and prior to mitosis. We show that 16 suppressor mutations of cut14-Y1 were all mapped within the hinge domain, which surrounded the original L543 mutation site.

scholarly journals APOBEC1 cytosine deaminase activity on single-stranded DNA is suppressed by replication protein A

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lai Wong ◽  
Frederick S Vizeacoumar ◽  
Franco J Vizeacoumar ◽  
Linda Chelico
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Cytosine Deaminase ◽  
Cancer Cell Line ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Lung Cancer Cell Line ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Cancer Evolution

Abstract Many APOBEC cytidine deaminase members are known to induce ‘off-target’ cytidine deaminations in 5′TC motifs in genomic DNA that contribute to cancer evolution. In this report, we characterized APOBEC1, which is a possible cancer related APOBEC since APOBEC1 mRNA is highly expressed in certain types of tumors, such as lung adenocarcinoma. We found a low level of APOBEC1-induced DNA damage, as measured by γH2AX foci, in genomic DNA of a lung cancer cell line that correlated to its inability to compete in vitro with replication protein A (RPA) for ssDNA. This suggests that RPA can act as a defense against off-target deamination for some APOBEC enzymes. Overall, the data support the model that the ability of an APOBEC to compete with RPA can better predict genomic damage than combined analysis of mRNA expression levels in tumors and analysis of mutation signatures.

scholarly journals Formation of a Complex between Nucleolin and Replication Protein a after Cell Stress Prevents Initiation of DNA Replication

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaron Daniely ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Cell Stress ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Binding Studies

We used a biochemical screen to identify nucleolin, a key factor in ribosome biogenesis, as a high-affinity binding partner for the heterotrimeric human replication protein A (hRPA). Binding studies in vitro demonstrated that the two proteins physically interact, with nucleolin using an unusual contact with the small hRPA subunit. Nucleolin significantly inhibited both simian virus 40 (SV-40) origin unwinding and SV-40 DNA replication in vitro, likely by nucleolin preventing hRPA from productive interaction with the SV-40 initiation complex. In vivo, use of epifluorescence and confocal microscopy showed that heat shock caused a dramatic redistribution of nucleolin from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Nucleolin relocalization was concomitant with a tenfold increase in nucleolin–hRPA complex formation. The relocalized nucleolin significantly overlapped with the position of hRPA, but only poorly with sites of ongoing DNA synthesis. We suggest that the induced nucleolin–hRPA interaction signifies a novel mechanism that represses chromosomal replication after cell stress.

scholarly journals Novel Checkpoint Response to Genotoxic Stress Mediated by Nucleolin-Replication Protein A Complex Formation

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 2463-2474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Kim ◽  
Diana D. Dimitrova ◽  
Kristine M. Carta ◽  
Anjana Saxena ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Chromosomal Dna

ABSTRACT Human replication protein A (RPA), the primary single-stranded DNA-binding protein, was previously found to be inhibited after heat shock by complex formation with nucleolin. Here we show that nucleolin-RPA complex formation is stimulated after genotoxic stresses such as treatment with camptothecin or exposure to ionizing radiation. Complex formation in vitro and in vivo requires a 63-residue glycine-arginine-rich (GAR) domain located at the extreme C terminus of nucleolin, with this domain sufficient to inhibit DNA replication in vitro. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrate that the nucleolin-RPA interaction after stress occurs both in the nucleoplasm and in the nucleolus. Expression of the GAR domain or a nucleolin mutant (TM) with a constitutive interaction with RPA is sufficient to inhibit entry into S phase. Increasing cellular RPA levels by overexpression of the RPA2 subunit minimizes the inhibitory effects of nucleolin GAR or TM expression on chromosomal DNA replication. The arrest is independent of p53 activation by ATM or ATR and does not involve heightened expression of p21. Our data reveal a novel cellular mechanism that represses genomic replication in response to genotoxic stress by inhibition of an essential DNA replication factor.

scholarly journals FANCJ (BACH1) helicase forms DNA damage inducible foci with replication protein A and interacts physically and functionally with the single-stranded DNA-binding protein

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 2390-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rigu Gupta ◽  
Sudha Sharma ◽  
Joshua A. Sommers ◽  
Mark K. Kenny ◽  
Sharon B. Cantor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Single Stranded Dna

The BRCA1 associated C-terminal helicase (BACH1, designated FANCJ) is implicated in the chromosomal instability genetic disorder Fanconi anemia (FA) and hereditary breast cancer. A critical role of FANCJ helicase may be to restart replication as a component of downstream events that occur during the repair of DNA cross-links or double-strand breaks. We investigated the potential interaction of FANCJ with replication protein A (RPA), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein implicated in both DNA replication and repair. FANCJ and RPA were shown to coimmunoprecipitate most likely through a direct interaction of FANCJ and the RPA70 subunit. Moreover, dependent on the presence of BRCA1, FANCJ colocalizes with RPA in nuclear foci after DNA damage. Our data are consistent with a model in which FANCJ associates with RPA in a DNA damage-inducible manner and through the protein interaction RPA stimulates FANCJ helicase to better unwind duplex DNA substrates. These findings identify RPA as the first regulatory partner of FANCJ. The FANCJ-RPA interaction is likely to be important for the role of the helicase to more efficiently unwind DNA repair intermediates to maintain genomic stability.

scholarly journals Functional Diversification of Replication Protein A Paralogs and Telomere Length Maintenance in Arabidopsis

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 215 (4) ◽  
pp. 989-1002
Author(s):  
Behailu B. Aklilu ◽  
François Peurois ◽  
Carole Saintomé ◽  
Kevin M. Culligan ◽  
Daniela Kobbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Telomerase Activity ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
Telomere Shortening ◽  
Replication Group

Replication protein A (RPA) is essential for many facets of DNA metabolism. The RPA gene family expanded in Arabidopsis thaliana with five phylogenetically distinct RPA1 subunits (RPA1A-E), two RPA2 (RPA2A and B), and two RPA3 (RPA3A and B). RPA1 paralogs exhibit partial redundancy and functional specialization in DNA replication (RPA1B and RPA1D), repair (RPA1C and RPA1E), and meiotic recombination (RPA1A and RPA1C). Here, we show that RPA subunits also differentially impact telomere length set point. Loss of RPA1 resets bulk telomeres at a shorter length, with a functional hierarchy for replication group over repair and meiosis group RPA1 subunits. Plants lacking RPA2A, but not RPA2B, harbor short telomeres similar to the replication group. Telomere shortening does not correlate with decreased telomerase activity or deprotection of chromosome ends in rpa mutants. However, in vitro assays show that RPA1B2A3B unfolds telomeric G-quadruplexes known to inhibit replications fork progression. We also found that ATR deficiency can partially rescue short telomeres in rpa2a mutants, although plants exhibit defects in growth and development. Unexpectedly, the telomere shortening phenotype of rpa2a mutants is completely abolished in plants lacking the RTEL1 helicase. RTEL1 has been implicated in a variety of nucleic acid transactions, including suppression of homologous recombination. Thus, the lack of telomere shortening in rpa2a mutants upon RTEL1 deletion suggests that telomere replication defects incurred by loss of RPA may be bypassed by homologous recombination. Taken together, these findings provide new insight into how RPA cooperates with replication and recombination machinery to sustain telomeric DNA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document