Nuclear electron double resonance in liquids

In this contribution we hope to illustrate with preliminary measurements some of the ways in which nuclear-electron double resonance experiments can yield information of value to the chemist. The magnetic coupling between a paramagnetic electron of spin S and a nucleus of spin I may be described (Abragam 1961) by the spin Hamiltonian H s, I = γ e γ n I [3r(S. r)/ r 5 – S/ r 3 + 16 π /3 S| ψ e (0)| 2 ], where γ e , γ n are the electron and nuclear gyromagnetic ratios respectively, r is the vector radius joining I and S and | ψ e (0)| 2 is a measure of the overlap between the electron and nuclear wave functions. The first two terms describe the magnetic dipole-dipole interaction dominant at large interspin distances, and the third covers any short-range scalar or contact interactions. In non-viscous solutions of free radicals the rapid relative motion of the spins causes the Hamiltonian to become time dependent. If the motion is quite random the dipolar terms become entirely time dependent and are significant only in electron-nucleus relaxation phenomena. The scalar term, on the other hand, may not be completely averaged and can thus cause both relaxation phenomena and paramagnetic shifts in the nuclear resonance spectrum of the solvent (Bloembergen 1957). Thus the dynamic parts of both the scalar and the dipolar interactions are effective in producing mutual relaxation of the spins. Just which of the possible two spin processes is the most effective can be found by expanding the time-dependent Hamiltonian from equation (1) into its component spin operators and finding their relative spectral densities (Abragam 1955,1961). The dipole-dipole part of the Hamiltonian then becomes H d.d ( t ) = [ J 1 S z I z + J 2 {S + I_ + S_I + } + J 3 { S z I + + I z S + } ( A ) ( B ) ( C ) + J 3 { S z I_ + I z S_} + J 4 {S + I + } + J 4 {S_I_}] σ 1 /< r 3 SI >, ( D ) ( E ) ( F ) and the scalar part becomes H sc . ( t ) = [ J 5 S z I z + J 6 {S + I_ + S_I + }] σ 2 | ψ e (0)| 2 , where < r 3 SI > is the mean value of the cube of the electron-nuclear distance, σ1 and σ2 are proportionality constants, the J ’s are the spectral densities, S z , I z are the z components of the spin operators and S + I + ; S_I_ are the raising and lowering operators for the electron and nuclear spins respectively. For a white spectrum of relative motions between the spins, terms E and F are not the most important for dipolar coupling. This leads to the established reversal of nuclear polarization in Overhauser experiments between nuclei with positive magnetic moments and electrons (Richards & White 1962 a, b ). Under the same conditions a dominant scalar coupling leads to an enhancement of the nuclear polarization because of its different relaxation operators.

Author(s):  
M. M. Glazov

The transfer of nonequilibrium spin polarization between the electron and nuclear subsystems is studied in detail. Usually, a thermal orientation of nuclei in magnetic field is negligible due to their small magnetic moments, but if electron spins are optically oriented, efficient nuclear spin polarization can occur. The microscopic approach to the dynamical nuclear polarization effect based on the kinetic equation method, along with a phenomenological but very powerful description of dynamical nuclear polarization in terms of the nuclear spin temperature concept is given. In this way, one can account for the interaction between neighbouring nuclei without solving a complex many-body problem. The hyperfine interaction also induces the feedback of polarized nuclei on the electron spin system giving rise to a number of nonlinear effects: bistability of nuclear spin polarization and anomalous Hanle effect, dragging and locking of optical resonances in quantum dots. Theory is illustrated by experimental data on dynamical nuclear polarization.


1986 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stutzmann ◽  
David K. Biegelsen

AbstractThe hyperfine interaction between electronic and nuclear spins in hydrogenated amorphous silicon has been observed for the various paramagnetic defects in this material by electron spin resonance (ESR) and electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR). The large hyperfine interaction between dangling bonds and 29Si as well as between donor electrons and 31p or 75 As nuclei can be resolved in ESR and provides direct information about the structure of the underlying electronic states. The smaller dipolar coupling of all paramagnetic states to more distant nuclei leads to an ENDOR response near the free nuclear resonance frequencies, which can be used to study the coupling of the electronic and nuclear spin system to the lattice phonons and to each other.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 851-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Annino ◽  
J. A. Villanueva-Garibay ◽  
P. J. M. van Bentum ◽  
A. A. K. Klaassen ◽  
A. P. M. Kentgens

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunko Lee ◽  
Leonard W. Reeves

The proton magnetic resonance spectra of dimethylthallium ion has been studied in both anionic and cationic detergent nematic phases. The spectra were analyzed to derive the values of inter- and intramethyl proton–proton dipolar coupling and the intermethyl scalar coupling constants. The degree of orientation of the dimethylthallium cation is much higher in the anionic nematic phase than in the cationic phase. It is proposed that electrostatic interactions play a significant role in the orientation of complex ions in ionic detergent nematic phases.


1981 ◽  
Vol 301 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Levy ◽  
N. Benczer-Koller ◽  
C. Broude ◽  
G. Goldring ◽  
K. Hagemeyer

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1065-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Wu ◽  
Xiao-Lei Li ◽  
Mei Guo ◽  
Lang Zhao ◽  
Yi-Quan Zhang ◽  
...  

Toroidal arrangements of magnetic moments are realized in TbIII and DyIII based heterometallic macrocycles thanks to the magnetic coupling between lanthanide and 3d metal ions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document