Convection in the Moon and the existence of a lunar core

The marked departure of the Moon from hydrostatic equilibrium is an important clue to its physical evolution. The ellipticity of the earthward bulge, determined statistically from the geometrical librations, is over twice that determined dynamically from Cassini’s laws. The inference is drawn that the internal density varies with angle. This may arise through convection or because the Moon has a finite strength which enables original density anomalies to be retained. The latter explanation is untenable if creep rates in the interior exceed 10 –20 s –1 . The hypothesis of flow suggests a search for evidence of small movements in the surface. A satisfactory theory must explain why the mechanical ellipticity is neither ¼ nor 1.

1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Collinson
Keyword(s):  
The Moon ◽  

Before discussing its cause, one must be clear in exactly what respect the lunar figure deviates from the equilibrium one. This is necessary because there has been confusion over the question for a long time. It was known early that the Moon’s ellipsoid of inertia is triaxial and that the differences of the principal moments of inertia determined from observations are several times larger than the theoretical values corresponding to hydrostatic equilibrium. The stability of lunar rotation requires that the axis of least moment of inertia point approximately towards the Earth and the laws of Cassini show that it is really so.


1972 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 377-383
Author(s):  
S. K. Runcorn

It is natural to inquire whether thermal convection is occurring in the Moon through solid state creep processes. The primary evidence is the departure of the Moon from the figure of hydrostatic equilibrium, but certain difficulties in the thermal history of the Moon are eased by assuming heat transfer by convection. If convection exists in the Moon it must have a second harmonic pattern, otherwise the lunar moments of inertia would not differ.Two important predictions of the marginal theory of convection: the existence of a core of radius 0.06–0.3 of the lunar radius (for a second ergee harmonic) and the value of 0.4 for the ratio of the dynamical to surface ellipticities now have support, the latter from the data of the heights of the lunar surface. The former prediction is compatible with the value of the moment of inertia factor now found if the Moon's interior is ‘hot’.Further the existence of a fluid iron core 3400 m.y. ago seems required as a result of the remanent magnetization of the crystalline rocks of the maria basins inferred from the remanent magnetization of the returned Apollo samples and the fields measured by the Apollo 12 and Explorer magnetomers.


Dissipation in the Moon produces a small offset, ca. 0.23", of the Moon's rotation axis from the plane defined by the ecliptic and lunar orbit normals. Both solid body tidal friction and viscous fluid friction at a core—mantle interface are plausible mechanisms. In this paper, I discuss the merits of each and find that solid friction requires a low lunar tidal Q , ca . 28, while turbulent fluid friction requires a core of radius 330 km to cause the signature observed by lunar laser ranging. Large ( ca . 0.4—8.0") free librations of the lunar figure have also been detected by laser ranging. Both a very recent impact on the Moon and fluid turbulence in the lunar core are plausible mechanisms for generating these free librations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 1018-1037
Author(s):  
O. L. Kuskov ◽  
E. V. Kronrod ◽  
K. Matsumoto ◽  
V. A. Kronrod

Abstract One of the pivoting problems of the geochemistry and geophysics of the Moon is the structure of its central region, i.e., its core and adjacent transition layer located at the boundary between the solid mantle and liquid or partially molten core. The chemical composition of the mantle and the internal structure of the central region of the Moon were simulated based on the joint inversion of seismic, selenophysical, and geochemical parameters that are not directly interrelated. The solution of the inverse problem is based on the Bayesian approach and the use of the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm in combination with the method of Gibbs free energy minimization. The results show that the radius of the Moon’s central region is about 500–550 km. The thickness of the transition layer and the radii of the outer and inner cores relatively weakly depend on the composition models of the bulk silicate Moon with different contents of refractory oxides. The silicate portion of the Moon is enriched in FeO (12–13 wt %, FeO ~ 1.5 × BSE) and depleted in MgO (Mg# 79–81) relative to the bulk composition of the silicate Earth (BSE), which is in conflict with the possibility of the formation of the Moon from the Earth’s primitive mantle and does not find an adequate explanation in the current canonical and non-canonical models of the origin of the Moon. SiO2 concentrations in all zones of the lunar mantle vary insignificantly and amount to 52–53 wt %, and the predominant mineral of the upper mantle is low-Ca orthopyroxene but not olivine. With respect to Al2O3, the lunar mantle is stratified, with a Al2O3 content higher in the lower mantle than in all overlying shells. The partially molten transition layer surrounding the core is about 200–250 km thick. The radii of the solid inner core are within 50–250 km, and the most probable radii of the liquid outer core are ~300–350 km. The physical characteristics of the lunar core are compared with experimental measurements of the density and speed of sound of liquid Fe(Ni)–S–C–Si alloys. If the seismic model of the liquid outer core with VP = 4100 ± 200 m/s (Weber et al., 2011) is reasonably reliable, then this uncertainty range is in the best agreement with the VP values of 3900–4100 m/s of liquid Fe(Ni)–S alloys, with sulfur content up to ~10 wt % and a density of 6200–7000 kg/m3, as well as with the inverted values of density and velocity of the outer core. The VP values of liquid Fe–Ni–C and Fe–N–Si alloys at 5 GPa exceed seismic estimates of the speed of sound of the outer lunar core, which indicates that carbon and silicon can hardly be dominant light elements of the lunar core. The inner Fe(Ni) core (possibly with an insignificant content of light elements: sulfur and carbon) is presumably solid and has a density of 7500–7700 kg/m3. The difference in density between the inner and outer cores Δρ ~ 500–1000 kg/m3 can be explained by the difference in their composition.


Eos ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 65 (22) ◽  
pp. 369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horton E. Newsom

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. eaax0883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saied Mighani ◽  
Huapei Wang ◽  
David L. Shuster ◽  
Cauȇ S. Borlina ◽  
Claire I. O. Nichols ◽  
...  

Magnetic measurements of the lunar crust and Apollo samples indicate that the Moon generated a dynamo magnetic field lasting from at least 4.2 until <2.5 billion years (Ga) ago. However, it has been unclear when the dynamo ceased. Here, we report paleomagnetic and 40Ar/39Ar studies showing that two lunar breccias cooled in a near-zero magnetic field (<0.1 μT) at 0.44 ± 0.01 and 0.91 ± 0.11 Ga ago, respectively. Combined with previous paleointensity estimates, this indicates that the lunar dynamo likely ceased sometime between ~1.92 and ~0.80 Ga ago. The protracted lifetime of the lunar magnetic field indicates that the late dynamo was likely powered by crystallization of the lunar core.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1021-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. K. Petrova ◽  
Yu. A. Nefedyev ◽  
A. A. Zagidullin ◽  
A. O. Andreev

1993 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Hanada ◽  
Masatsugu Ooe ◽  
Noriyuki Kawaguchi ◽  
Nobuyuki Kawano ◽  
Seisuke Kuji ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document