scholarly journals A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1954) ◽  
pp. 20210966
Author(s):  
David Alais ◽  
Yiben Xu ◽  
Susan G. Wardle ◽  
Jessica Taubert

Facial expressions are vital for social communication, yet the underlying mechanisms are still being discovered. Illusory faces perceived in objects (face pareidolia) are errors of face detection that share some neural mechanisms with human face processing. However, it is unknown whether expression in illusory faces engages the same mechanisms as human faces. Here, using a serial dependence paradigm, we investigated whether illusory and human faces share a common expression mechanism. First, we found that images of face pareidolia are reliably rated for expression, within and between observers, despite varying greatly in visual features. Second, they exhibit positive serial dependence for perceived facial expression, meaning an illusory face (happy or angry) is perceived as more similar in expression to the preceding one, just as seen for human faces. This suggests illusory and human faces engage similar mechanisms of temporal continuity. Third, we found robust cross-domain serial dependence of perceived expression between illusory and human faces when they were interleaved, with serial effects larger when illusory faces preceded human faces than the reverse. Together, the results support a shared mechanism for facial expression between human faces and illusory faces and suggest that expression processing is not tightly bound to human facial features.

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1134-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Akechi ◽  
Atsushi Senju ◽  
Yukiko Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshikuni Tojo ◽  
Hiroo Osanai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Langbehn ◽  
Dasha Yermol ◽  
Fangyun Zhao ◽  
Christopher Thorstenson ◽  
Paula Niedenthal

Abstract According to the familiar axiom, the eyes are the window to the soul. However, wearing masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 involves occluding a large portion of the face. Do the eyes carry all of the information we need to perceive each other’s emotions? We addressed this question in two studies. In the first, 162 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers saw videos of human faces displaying expressions of happiness, disgust, anger, and surprise that were fully visible or covered by N95, surgical, or cloth masks and rated the extent to which the expressions conveyed each of the four emotions. Across mask conditions, participants perceived significantly lower levels of the expressed (target) emotion and this was particularly true for expressions composed of greater facial action in the lower part of the faces. Furthermore, higher levels of other (non-target) emotions were perceived in masked compared to visible faces. In the second study, 60 MTurk workers rated the extent to which three types of smiles (reward, affiliation, and dominance smiles), either visible or masked, conveyed positive feelings, reassurance, and superiority. They reported that masked smiles communicated less of the target signal than visible faces, but not more of other possible signals. Political attitudes were not systematically associated with disruptions in the processing of facial expression caused by masking the face.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e22287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Baggott ◽  
Romina Palermo ◽  
Mark A. Williams

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Delle-Vigne ◽  
W. Wang ◽  
C. Kornreich ◽  
P. Verbanck ◽  
S. Campanella

2015 ◽  
Vol 1608 ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Yaping Yang ◽  
Entao Zhang ◽  
Fuqiang Qiao ◽  
Wenyi Lin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 30-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Vitale ◽  
Mary-Anne Williams ◽  
Benjamin Johnston ◽  
Giuseppe Boccignone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document