scholarly journals Identity and compatibility of reference genome resources

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Stolarczyk ◽  
Bingjie Xue ◽  
Nathan C. Sheffield

Genome analysis relies on reference data like sequences, feature annotations, and aligner indexes. These data can be found in many versions from many sources, making it challenging to identify and assess compatibility among them. For example, how can you determine which indexes are derived from identical raw sequence files, or which annotations share a compatible coordinate system? Here, we describe a novel approach to establish identity and compatibility of reference genome resources. We approach this with three advances: First, we derive unique identifiers for each resource; second, we record parent-child relationships among resources; and third, we describe recursive identifiers that determine identity as well as compatibility of coordinate systems and sequence names. These advances facilitate portability, reproducibility, and re-use of genome reference data.Availabilityhttps://refgenie.databio.org

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Stolarczyk ◽  
Bingjie Xue ◽  
Nathan C Sheffield

Abstract Genome analysis relies on reference data like sequences, feature annotations, and aligner indexes. These data can be found in many versions from many sources, making it challenging to identify and assess compatibility among them. For example, how can you determine which indexes are derived from identical raw sequence files, or which annotations share a compatible coordinate system? Here, we describe a novel approach to establish identity and compatibility of reference genome resources. We approach this with three advances: first, we derive unique identifiers for each resource; second, we record parent–child relationships among resources; and third, we describe recursive identifiers that determine identity as well as compatibility of coordinate systems and sequence names. These advances facilitate portability, reproducibility, and re-use of genome reference data. Available athttps://refgenie.databio.org.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Yi ◽  
Lauren Liu ◽  
Páll Melsted ◽  
Lior Pachter

AbstractMotivationGenome alignment of reads is the first step of most genome analysis workflows. In the case of RNA-Seq, transcriptome pseudoalignment of reads is a fast alternative to genome alignment, but the different “coordinate systems” of the genome and transcriptome have made it difficult to perform direct comparisons between the approaches.ResultsWe have developed tools for converting genome alignments to transcriptome pseudoalignments, and conversely, for projecting transcriptome pseudoalignments to genome alignments. Using these tools, we performed a direct comparison of genome alignment with transcriptome pseudoalignment. We find that both approaches produce similar quantifications. This means that for many applications genome alignment and transcriptome pseudoalignment are interchangeable.Availability and Implementationbam2tcc is a C++14 software for converting alignments in SAM/BAM format to transcript compatibility counts (TCCs) and is available at https://github.com/pachterlab/bam2tcc. kallisto genomebam is a user option of kallisto that outputs a sorted BAM file in genome coordinates as part of transcriptome pseudoalignment. The feature has been released with kallisto v0.44.0, and is available at https://pachterlab.github.io/kallisto/.Supplementary MaterialN/AContactLior Pachter ([email protected])


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly K. Mathos ◽  
Ray Firth

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Kranzler ◽  
Lindsay Liotta ◽  
Maria Pantin ◽  
Justin R. Misurell ◽  
Craig Springer

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Aygul Fazlyeva ◽  
Nataliya Slyunko

In modern society there is much concern about the issue of preventing and resolving confl icts in parent-child relationships. The article presents the work of a social teacher on the prevention and resolution of such confl icts. The authors have developed a number of recommendations for a novice social teacher, including based on their own experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document