Reference Coordinate System Requirements for Geophysics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 962 (8) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
V.E. Tereshchenko

The article suggests a technique for relation global kinematic reference system and local static realization of global reference system by regional continuously operated reference stations (CORS) network. On the example of regional CORS network located in the Novosibirsk Region (CORS NSO) the relation parameters of the global reference system WGS-84 and its local static realization by CORS NSO network at the epoch of fixing stations coordinates in catalog are calculated. With the realization of this technique, the main parameters to be determined are the speed of displacement one system center relativly to another and the speeds of rotation the coordinate axes of one system relatively to another, since the time evolution of most stations in the Russian Federation is not currently provided. The article shows the scale factor for relation determination of coordinate systems is not always necessary to consider. The technique described in the article also allows detecting the errors in determining the coordinates of CORS network in global coordinate system and compensate for them. A systematic error of determining and fixing the CORS NSO coordinates in global coordinate system was detected. It is noted that the main part of the error falls on the altitude component and reaches 12 cm. The proposed technique creates conditions for practical use of the advanced method Precise Point Positioning (PPP) in some regions of the Russian Federation. Also the technique will ensure consistent PPP method results with the results of the most commonly used in the Russian Federation other post-processing methods of high-precision positioning.


1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 145-153
Author(s):  
Dennis D. McCarthy

AbstractThe report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation endorsed by Commissions 4, 8, 19 and 31 at the 1979 General Assembly points out that “… the complete theory of the general nutational motion of the Earth about its center of mass may be described by the sum of two components, astronomical nutation, commonly referred to as nutation, which is nutation with respect to a space-fixed coordinate system, and polar motion, which is nutation with respect to a body-fixed system …”. Unlike the situation for the space-fixed frame, there is not an adequate, formally accepted, body-fixed system for this purpose. The Conventional International Origin (CIO) as it is presently defined is no longer acceptable because of recent improvements in observational techniques. The effective lack of this type of terrestrial reference frame limits the complete description of the general nutational motion of the Earth. In the absence of a terrestrial reference frame suitable for specifying the orientation of the Earth, it is suggested that a body-fixed system could be represented formally in a manner analogous to that used to represent the space-fixed frame. This procedure would be quite similar to methods employed currently by the International Polar Motion Service and the Bureau International de l’Heure, and would allow for the use of observations from new techniques in the definition of a terrestrial reference frame to be used to specify the complete nutational motion of the Earth.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 63-77
Author(s):  
E. P. Fedotov

AbstractThe axes of coordinate systems used in geodynamics are believed to be attached to a number of physical points on the surface of the Earth. This is true when measurements of the distances (ranging) are dealt with. On the other hand, the axes of reference systems used by the BIH and IFMS are attached not to the points themselves but to a pencil of plumb lines at these points. For the case of observations with radio interferometers being used for the study of Earth’s rotation, the rotating frame of reference could be attached in some prescribed way toihebaselines of the interferometers.But in no case is rigid attachment possible, because both the above points and lines move relative to each other. We should search for another way to define the reference systems for geodynamics. With that end in view, a knowledge of magnitudes of pertinent dynamical phenomena becomes vital.This paper considers the effects of some dynamical phenomena upon the distances between the points on. the Earth’s surface and upon the angles between plumb lines and, possibly, also between baselines of radio interferometers. In particular, this paper discusses body tides, continental drift, internal motion within crustal blocks, redistribution of mass which can affect the directions of plumb lines, etc. Polar motion and variations in the rate of Earth’s rotation will be also touched upon as far as these phenomena contribute to deformation of the Earth and its gravitation field.The results are summarised in diagrams showing how the variations of the above distances and angles depend upon both time and positions on the Earth. In other words, the power spectrum of the variation will be presented as a function of time and distance expressed either in kilometers or in degrees of arc on the Earth’s surface.


1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan I. Mueller

AbstractA common requirement for all geodynamic investigations is a well-defined coordinate system attached to the earth in some prescribed way, as well as a well-defined inertial coordinate system in which the motions of the terrestrial system can be monitored. This paper deals with the problems encountered when establishing such coordinate systems and the transformations between them. In addition, problems related to the modeling of the deformable earth are discussed.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 49-62
Author(s):  
C. A. Lundquist

AbstractThe current need for more precisely defined reference coordinate systems arises for geodynamics because the Earth can certainly not be treated as a rigid body when measurement uncertainties reach the few centimeter scale or its angular equivalent. At least two coordinate systems seem to be required. The first is a system defined in space relative to appropriate astronomical objects. This system should approximate an inertial reference frame, or be accurately related to such a reference, because only such a coordinate system is suitable for ultimately expressing the dynamical equations of motion for the Earth. The second required coordinate system must be associated with the nonrigid Earth in some well defined way so that the rotational motions of the whole Earth are meaningfully represented by the transformation parameters relating the Earth system to the space-inertial system. The Earth system should be defined so that the dynamical equations for relative motions of the various internal mechanical components of the Earth and accurate measurements of these motions are conveniently expressed in this system.


1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 239-250
Author(s):  
J. B. Zieliński

AbstractThe center of mass of the Earth is commonly taken as origin for the coordinate systems used in satellite geodesy. In this paper the notion of the “geocenter” is discussed from the point of view of mechanics and geophysics. It is shown that processes in and above the crust have practically no impact on the position of the geocenter. It is possible however that motions of the inner core may cause variations of the geocenter of the order of 1 m. Nevertheless the geocenter is the best point for the origin of a coordinate system. Mather’s method of monitoring geocenter motion is discussed, and some other possibilities are mentioned. Concerning the scale problem, the role of the constant GM and time measurements in satellite net determinations are briefly discussed.


1979 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 89-101
Author(s):  
E. P. Fedorov

IAU Symposium No. 78 “Nutation and the Rotation of the Earth” held in Kiev in 1977 revealed a certain lack of precision in the fundamental concepts and some looseness of terminology employed in the treatment of this problem. When talking about polar motion we should give, first of all, rigorous conceptual definitions of both the pole and a reference frame in which it moves. The selection of a reference system was the topic of an IAU Colloquium held in Torun in 1974. Although the discussion there was thorough and comprehensive, it did not result in the removal of all ambiguities which have tarnished discussion of the problems in the understanding of the Earth's rotation.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 15-20

As initial guidance for its deliberations, Working Group 1 accepted the objective implied in the Colloquium title and the more explicit description contained in the First Circular announcing the Colloquium:Earth dynamics is currently the subject of intensive world-wide research efforts. As a consequence of the new insights into Earth dynamics and acceptance of the hypothesis of moving tectonic plates, as well as the ability to measure crustal motions on a global scale with a precision of a few centimeters, a number of national and international projects have been organized to pursue these investigations. In all these efforts, a common feature is the necessity for a very well defined coordinate system to which all observations can be referred and in which theories can be formulated. At this time there is no widely accepted coordinate system in the Earth or in space which is defined with the precision needed for ongoing geodynamics research.


1985 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Vaníček ◽  
Galo Carrera

Whichever way the geodetic reference ellipsoid, used as a horizontal datum, is oriented within the earth it is theoretically never exactly aligned with the geocentric coordinate system (called here Conventional Terrestrial System). It is then important to know just how much the misalignment affects the pertinent geodetic quantities in the horizontal geodetic network: the azimuth and the deflection components. The misalignment effect on these geodetic quantities must be accounted for to maintain the consistency of all the involved coordinate systems and transformations between them.


1981 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
V. S. Kislyuk

The selection of selenodetic reference coordinate system is an important problem in astronomy and selenodesy. For the purposes of reduction of observations, planning and executing space missions to the Moon, it is necessary, in any case, to know the orientation of the adopted selenodetic reference system in respect to the inertial coordinate system.Let us introduce the following coordinate systems: C(ξc, ηc, ζc), the Cassini system which is defined by the Cassini laws of the Moon rotation;D(ξd, ηd, ζd), the dynamical coordinate system, whose axes coincide with the principal axes of inertia of the Moon;Q(ξq, ηq, ζq), the quasi-dynamical coordinate system connected with the mean direction to the Earth, which is shifted by 254" West and 75" North from the longest axis of the dynamical system (Williams et al., 1973);S(ξs, ηs, ζs), the selenodetic coordinate system, which is practically realized by the positions of the points on the Moon surface given in Catalogues;I(X,Y,Z), the space-fixed (inertial) coordinate system. All the systems are selenocentric with the exception of S(ξs, ηs, ζs On the whole, the origin of this system does not coincide with the center of mass of the Moon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document